View Item 

Show simple item record

Behaving Optimistically: How the (Un)Desirability of an Outcome Can Bias People’s Preparations for It
dc.contributor.authorStuart, Jillian O’ Rourke
dc.contributor.authorWindschitl, Paul D.
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Andrew R.
dc.contributor.authorScherer, Aaron M.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-10T19:09:52Z
dc.date.available2018-03-01T16:43:51Zen
dc.date.issued2017-01
dc.identifier.citationStuart, Jillian O’ Rourke; Windschitl, Paul D.; Smith, Andrew R.; Scherer, Aaron M. (2017). "Behaving Optimistically: How the (Un)Desirability of an Outcome Can Bias People’s Preparations for It." Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 30(1): 54-69.
dc.identifier.issn0894-3257
dc.identifier.issn1099-0771
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/135587
dc.description.abstractPast research on the desirability bias and on bracing for bad news has focused on the potential influence of outcome desirability on people’s stated expectations. The present studies examined its influence on behavior—that is, what is done in anticipation of, or preparation for, an uncertain outcome. In five studies, the desirability of possible outcomes for an event, which was uncertain and uncontrollable by the participant, was manipulated, and preparation behavior was measured. Study 1 used a hypothetical‐events paradigm. Studies 2 and 3 involved a computer activity in which behavior was tracked on a trial‐by‐trial basis. In Studies 4 and 5, the uncertain event was the ending of a videotaped basketball game. Rather than exhibiting bracing or a reluctance to tempt fate, participants tended to behave in a manner consistent with an optimistic desirability bias. In a subset of studies, predictions and likelihood judgments were also solicited; the differential effects of outcome desirability on these measures are discussed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.publisherCambridge University Press
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherreadiness
dc.subject.otherdecision making
dc.subject.otherrisk
dc.subject.otherpreparedness
dc.subject.otheroptimism bias
dc.subject.otherwishful thinking
dc.subject.otherdesirability bias
dc.titleBehaving Optimistically: How the (Un)Desirability of an Outcome Can Bias People’s Preparations for It
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135587/1/bdm1918_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135587/2/bdm1918.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bdm.1918
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Behavioral Decision Making
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShepperd, J. A., Ouellette, J. A., & Fernandez, J. K. ( 1996 ). Abandoning unrealistic optimism: Performance estimates and the temporal proximity of self‐relevant feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 844 – 855.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePruitt, D. G., & Hoge, R. D. ( 1965 ). Strength of the relationship between the value of an event and its subjective probability as a function of method of measurement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 483 – 489.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRisen, J. L., & Gilovich, T. ( 2007 ). Another look at why people are reluctant to exchange lottery tickets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 12 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRisen, J. L., & Gilovich, T. ( 2008 ). Why people are reluctant to tempt fate. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 293 – 307.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. ( 1994 ). Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self‐mastery, and self‐esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 1063 – 1078.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScherer, A. M., Windschitl, P. D., O’Rourke, J. L., & Smith, A. R. ( 2012 ). Hoping for more: The influence of outcome desirability on information seeking and predictions about relative quantities. Cognition, 125, 113 – 117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharot, T. ( 2011 ). The optimism bias: A tour of the irrationally positive brain. New York, NY: Panthenon/Random House.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShepperd, J. A., Carroll, P., Grace, J., & Terry, M. ( 2002 ). Exploring the causes of comparative optimism. Psychologica Belgica, 42, 65 – 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShepperd, J. A., Findley‐Klein, C., Kwavnick, K. D., Walker, D., & Perez, S. ( 2000 ). Bracing for loss. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 620 – 634.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweeny, K., Carroll, P. J., & Shepperd, J. A. ( 2006 ). Is optimism always best? Future outlooks and preparedness. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 302 – 306.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSweeny, K., & Krizan, Z. ( 2013 ). Sobering up: A quantitative review of temporal declines in expectations. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 702 – 724.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwirsky, C. L., Fernback, P. M., & Sloman, S. A. ( 2011 ). An illusion of control modulates the reluctance to tempt fate. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 688 – 696.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, K. M., & Shepperd, J. A. ( 1998 ). Bracing for the worst: Severity, testing, and feedback timing as moderators of the optimistic bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 915 – 926.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. ( 1988 ). Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193 – 210.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A., & Kahneman, D. ( 1992 ). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297 – 323.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTyler, J. M., & Rosier, J. G. ( 2009 ). Examining self‐presentation as a motivational explanation for comparative optimism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 716 – 727.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. ( 1994 ). Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review, 101, 547 – 567.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Wolferen, J., Inbar, Y., & Zeelenberg, M. ( 2013 ). Magical thinking in predictions of negative events: Evidence for tempting fate but not for a protection effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 8, 45 – 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVosgerau, J. ( 2010 ). How prevalent is wishful thinking? Misattribution of arousal causes optimism and pessimism in subjective probabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 32 – 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. ( 1988 ). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063 – 1070.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeber, E. U. ( 1994 ). From subjective probabilities to decision weights: The effect of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 228 – 242.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeber, E. U., & Hilton, D. J. ( 1990 ). Contextual effects in the interpretation of probability words: Perceived base rate and severity of events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16, 781 – 789.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWindschitl, P. D., & Stuart, J. O. (in press). Optimism biases. In Keren, G., & Wu, G. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making: An interdisciplinary perspective. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWindschitl, P. D., Scherer, A. M., Smith, A. R., & Rose, J. P. ( 2013 ). Why so confident? The influence of outcome desirability on selective exposure and likelihood judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 120, 73 – 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWindschitl, P. D., Smith, A. R., Rose, J. P., & Krizan, Z. ( 2010 ). The desirability bias in predictions: Going optimistic without leaving realism. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111, 33 – 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArmor, D. A., & Taylor, S. E. ( 2002 ). When predictions fail: The dilemma of unrealistic optimism. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 334 – 347 ). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBar‐Hillel, M., & Budescu, D. ( 1995 ). The elusive wishful thinking effect. Thinking and Reasoning, 1, 71 – 103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBilgin, B. ( 2012 ). Losses loom more likely than gains: Propensity to imagine losses increases their subjective probability. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 118, 203 – 215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBouts, P., & Van Avermaet, E. ( 1992 ). Drawing familiar or unfamiliar cards: Stimulus familiarity, chance orientation, and the illusion of control. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 331 – 335.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarver, C. S., & White, T. L. ( 1994 ). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319 – 333.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. ( 1984 ). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306 – 307.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarke, P. R., & Freedman, J. L. ( 1997 ). The belief in good luck scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 31, 486 – 511.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGilovich, T., Kerr, M., & Medvec, V. H. ( 1993 ). Effect of temporal perspective on subjective confidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 552 – 560.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris, A. J. L., & Hahn, U. ( 2011 ). Unrealistic optimism about future events: A cautionary note. Psychological Review, 118, 135 – 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaselton, M. G., & Nettle, D. ( 2006 ). The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 47 – 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, A. F. ( 2013 ). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayes, A. F. ( 2014 ). PROCESS (version 2.13). Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/introduction‐to‐mediation‐moderation‐and‐conditional‐process‐analysis.html (accessed on July 8, 2015).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHelweg‐Larsen, M., Sadeghian, P., & Webb, M. S. ( 2002 ). The stigma of being pessimistically biased. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 21, 92 – 107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIrwin, F. W. ( 1953 ). Stated expectations as a function of probability and desirability of outcomes. Journal of Personality, 21, 329 – 335.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIrwin, F. W., & Snodgrass, J. G. ( 1966 ). Effects of independent and dependent outcome values upon bets. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 291 – 297.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJudd, C. M., Kenny, D. A., & McClelland, G. H. ( 2001 ). Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within‐subject designs. Psychological Methods, 6, 115 – 134.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKahneman, D., & Tversky, A. ( 1979 ). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263 – 291.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKogut, T., & Ritov, I. ( 2011 ). ‘Protective donation’: When refusing a request for donation increases the sense of vulnerability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 1059 – 1069.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrizan, Z., & Windschitl, P. D. ( 2007 ). The influence of outcome desirability on optimism. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 95 – 121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrizan, Z., & Windschitl, P. D. ( 2009 ). Wishful thinking about the future: Does desire impact optimism? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3, 227 – 243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee, I. A., & Preacher, K. J. ( 2013 ). Calculation for the test of the difference between two dependent correlations with one variable in common [computer software]. Available from http://quantpsy.org (accessed on July 8, 2015).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLench, H. C. ( 2009 ). Automatic optimism: The affective basis of judgments about the likelihood of future events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 187 – 200.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLench, H. C., & Bench, S. W. ( 2014 ). Strength of affective reaction as a signal to think carefully. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 220 – 235.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLench, H. C., & Darbor, K. E. ( 2014 ). Negative affective reactions reduce perceived likelihood of risk. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 569 – 577.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLench, H. C., & Ditto, P. H. ( 2005 ). Automatic optimism: Biased use of base rate information for positive and negative events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 631 – 639.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. ( 2001 ). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarks, R. W. ( 1951 ). The effect of probability, desirability, and “privilege” on the stated expectations of children. Journal of Personality, 19, 332 – 351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller, D. T., & Taylor, B. R. ( 1995 ). Counterfactual thought, regret, and superstition: How to avoid kicking yourself. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 334 – 347 ). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorlock, H. C., & Hertz, J. H. ( 1964 ). Effect of the desirability of outcomes on decision making. Psychological Reports, 14, 11 – 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePrice, P. C., & Marquez, C. A. ( 2005 ). Wishful thinking in the predictions of a simple repeatable event: Effects on deterministic versus probabilistic predictions. Unpublished manuscript.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
bdm1918_am.pdf
Size:
4.475MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
bdm1918.pdf
Size:
267.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.