Show simple item record

Essays on Contest Design and Contract Design.

dc.contributor.authorJiang, Jiang
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-26T22:19:02Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION
dc.date.available2017-01-26T22:19:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.date.submitted
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/135819
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is broadly on the topic of behavioral economics and mechanism design, using lab experiments to study two settings: contest design and contract design. The first chapter studies how designers of two-stage elimination contests should allocate prizes and reveal interim performance information to achieve desired outcomes. To investigate the interactive effect of prize allocation and interim information revelation, I design a two-stage contest experiment with different combinations of these two instruments. While my theoretical model predicts a positive effect of awarding a single prize on effort regardless of information structure, I find this effect in the lab only when interim information is revealed. Moreover, revealing information motivates effort only under a single prize. These findings are consistent with a framework that ties together the intuitions of how these two instruments work on contestants: information on others' performance allows contestants to estimate their own probabilities of achieving different ranks, and hence increases their sensitivity to changes in the prize allocation that affects the ranks they are likely to reach. Given this interplay of prize and information, my findings suggest that contest designers should take into account the state of one instrument when optimizing the other. In the second chapter, we design a real-effort laboratory experiment to investigate how group identity influences decisions in a principal-agent framework with hidden action. Group identity is induced by random assignment to groups, and is further enhanced using a collective puzzle solving task. We find that the principals show ingroup favoritism towards ingroup agents by making more generous revenue-sharing offers. While ingroup agents are less tolerant of low offers from their principals, they exert greater effort in response to higher offers, relative to the control condition. The impact of group identity and incentives on agents' effort also depends on their perceptions of fair offers.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectelimination contests
dc.subjectlaboratory experiments
dc.subjectall-pay auctions
dc.subjectgroup identity
dc.subjectprincipal-agent problem
dc.subjecthidden action
dc.titleEssays on Contest Design and Contract Design.
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEconomics
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberChen, Yan
dc.contributor.committeememberMasatlioglu, Yusuf Can
dc.contributor.committeememberLeider, Stephen G
dc.contributor.committeememberLauermann, Stephan
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEconomics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness and Economics
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135819/1/jiangeco_1.pdf
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-4938-268X
dc.identifier.name-orcidJiang, Jiang; 0000-0003-4938-268Xen_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.