Venous thromboembolism in metastatic urothelial carcinoma or variant histologies: incidence, associative factors, and effect on survival
Ramos, Jorge D.; Casey, Martin F.; Crabb, Simon J.; Bamias, Aristotelis; Harshman, Lauren C.; Wong, Yu‐ning; Bellmunt, Joaquim; De Giorgi, Ugo; Ladoire, Sylvain; Powles, Thomas; Pal, Sumanta k.; Niegisch, Guenter; Recine, Federica; Alva, Ajjai; Agarwal, Neeraj; Necchi, Andrea; Vaishampayan, Ulka N.; Rosenberg, Jonathan E.; Galsky, Matthew D.; Yu, Evan y.
2017-01
Citation
Ramos, Jorge D.; Casey, Martin F.; Crabb, Simon J.; Bamias, Aristotelis; Harshman, Lauren C.; Wong, Yu‐ning ; Bellmunt, Joaquim; De Giorgi, Ugo; Ladoire, Sylvain; Powles, Thomas; Pal, Sumanta k. ; Niegisch, Guenter; Recine, Federica; Alva, Ajjai; Agarwal, Neeraj; Necchi, Andrea; Vaishampayan, Ulka N.; Rosenberg, Jonathan E.; Galsky, Matthew D.; Yu, Evan y. (2017). "Venous thromboembolism in metastatic urothelial carcinoma or variant histologies: incidence, associative factors, and effect on survival." Cancer Medicine 6(1): 186-194.
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is common in cancer patients. However, little is known about VTE risk in metastatic urothelial carcinoma or variant histologies (UC/VH). We sought to characterize the incidence, associative factors, including whether various chemotherapy regimens portend different risk, and impact of VTE on survival in metastatic UC/VH patients. Patients diagnosed with metastatic UC/VH from 2000 to 2013 were included in this multicenter retrospective, international study from 29 academic institutions. Cumulative and 6â month VTE incidence rates were determined. The association of firstâ line chemotherapy (divided into six groups) and other baseline characteristics on VTE were analyzed. Each chemotherapy treatment group and statistically significant baseline clinical characteristics were assessed in a multivariate, competingâ risk regression model. VTE patients were matched to nonâ VTE patients to determine the impact of VTE on overall survival. In all, 1762 patients were eligible for analysis. There were 144 (8.2%) and 90 (5.1%) events cumulative and within the first 6Â months, respectively. VTE rates based on chemotherapy group demonstrated no statistical difference when gemcitabine/cisplatin was used as the comparator. Nonâ urotheilal histology (SHR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.72â 4.16, PÂ <Â 0.001), moderate to severe renal dysfunction (SHR: 2.12; 95% CI: 1.26â 3.59, PÂ =Â 0.005), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) or CVD risk factors (SHR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.49â 3.45, PÂ =Â 0.001) were associated with increased VTE rates. Overall survival was worse in patients with VTE (median 6.0Â m vs. 10.2Â m, PÂ <Â 0.001). Thus, in metastatic UC/VH patients, VTE is common and has a negative impact on survival. We identified multiple associated potential risk factors, although different chemotherapy regimens did not alter risk.Venous thromboembolism is common and has a negative impact on survival in patients with metastatic urothelial tract cancers. Nonâ urothelial histology, renal dysfunction, and the presence of cardiovascular disease or risk factors for cardiovascular disease increase a patient’s risk for venous thromboembolism; however, there is no statistical difference in thrombotic risk between chemotherapy regimens.Publisher
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
ISSN
2045-7634 2045-7634
Other DOIs
Types
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.