View Item 

Show simple item record

The Changing Financial Landscape of Renal Transplant Practice: A National Cohort Analysis
dc.contributor.authorAxelrod, D. A.
dc.contributor.authorSchnitzler, M. A.
dc.contributor.authorXiao, H.
dc.contributor.authorNaik, A. S.
dc.contributor.authorSegev, D. L.
dc.contributor.authorDharnidharka, V. R.
dc.contributor.authorBrennan, D. C.
dc.contributor.authorLentine, K. L.
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-02T22:02:04Z
dc.date.available2018-04-02T18:03:23Zen
dc.date.issued2017-02
dc.identifier.citationAxelrod, D. A.; Schnitzler, M. A.; Xiao, H.; Naik, A. S.; Segev, D. L.; Dharnidharka, V. R.; Brennan, D. C.; Lentine, K. L. (2017). "The Changing Financial Landscape of Renal Transplant Practice: A National Cohort Analysis." American Journal of Transplantation 17(2): 377-389.
dc.identifier.issn1600-6135
dc.identifier.issn1600-6143
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136048
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherorgan allocation
dc.subject.otherrecipient selection
dc.subject.otherbusiness/management
dc.subject.otherkidney transplantation/nephrology
dc.subject.otherorgan transplantation in general
dc.subject.otherhealth services and outcomes research
dc.subject.othereconomics
dc.titleThe Changing Financial Landscape of Renal Transplant Practice: A National Cohort Analysis
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136048/1/ajt14018_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136048/2/ajt14018.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ajt.14018
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Transplantation
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchold JD, Srinivas TR, Howard RJ, Jamieson IR, Meier‐Kriesche HU. The association of candidate mortality rates with kidney transplant outcomes and center performance evaluations. Transplantation 2008; 85: 1 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMassie AB, Luo X, Chow EK, Alejo JL, Desai NM, Segev DL. Survival benefit of primary deceased donor transplantation with high‐KDPI kidneys. Am J Transplant 2014; 14: 2310 – 2316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaidi RF, Elias N, Kawai T, et al. Outcome of kidney transplantation using expanded criteria donors and donation after cardiac death kidneys: Realities and costs. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 2769 – 2774.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuchanan PM, Lentine KL, Burroughs TE, Schnitzler MA, Salvalaggio PR. Association of lower costs of pulsatile machine perfusion in renal transplantation from expanded criteria donors. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 2391 – 2401.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchnitzler MA, Lentine KL, Burroughs TE. The cost effectiveness of deceased organ donation. Transplantation 2005; 80: 1636 – 1637.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatas AJ, Schnitzler M, Daar AS. Payment for living kidney donors (vendors) is not an abstract ethical discussion occurring in a vacuum. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 1380 – 1381.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeld PJ, McCormick F, Ojo A, Roberts JP. A cost‐benefit analysis of government compensation of kidney donors. Am J Transplant 2016; 16: 877 – 885.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnglesbe MJ, Ads Y, Cohn JA, et al. The effects of donor and recipient practices on transplant center finances. Am J Transplant 2008; 8: 586 – 592.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod DA. Economic and financial outcomes in transplantation: Whose dime is it anyway? Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2013; 18: 222 – 228.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of Health and Human Services. Health Resources and Services Administration. 2004 Annual Report of the U.S. Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network and the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients: Transplant Data 1994‐2003.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAxelrod DA, Dzebisashvili N, Lentine K, et al. Assessing variation in the costs of care among patients awaiting liver transplantation. Am J Transplant 2014; 14: 70 – 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRecipients SRoT. Technical methods for the program‐specific reports. 2015 [cited 2016 Sept 8]. Available from: http://www.srtr.org/csr/current/Centers/201512/all_csr_documentation.pdf.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNassir BA, Dean CE, Li S, et al. Variation in cost and quality in kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2015; 99: 2150 – 2157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhiting JF, Woodward RS, Zavala EY, et al. Economic cost of expanded criteria donors in cadaveric renal transplantation: Analysis of Medicare payments. Transplantation 2000; 70: 755 – 760.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatas AJ, Schnitzler M. Payment for living donor (vendor) kidneys: A cost‐effectiveness analysis. Am J Transplant 2004; 4: 216 – 221.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGaylin DS, Held PJ, Port FK, et al. The impact of comorbid and sociodemographic factors on access to renal transplantation. JAMA 1993; 269: 603 – 608.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang E, Segev DL, Rabb H. Kidney transplantation in the elderly. Semin Nephrol 2009; 29: 621 – 635.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchold JD, Meier‐Kriesche HU. Which renal transplant candidates should accept marginal kidneys in exchange for a shorter waiting time on dialysis? Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2006; 1: 532 – 538.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeaphy EL, Poggio ED, Flechner SM, et al. Risk factors for retransplant kidney recipients: Relisting and outcomes from patients’ primary transplant. Am J Transplant 2014; 14: 1356 – 1367.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchold JD, Buccini LD, Poggio ED, Flechner SM, Goldfarb DA. Association of candidate removals from the kidney transplant waiting list and center performance oversight. Am J Transplant 2016; 16: 1276 – 1284.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVo AA, Petrozzino J, Yeung K, et al. Efficacy, outcomes, and cost‐effectiveness of desensitization using IVIG and rituximab. Transplantation 2013; 95: 852 – 858.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEnglesbe MJ, Dimick JB, Fan Z, Baser O, Birkmeyer JD. Case mix, quality and high‐cost kidney transplant patients. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 1108 – 1114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKutinova A, Woodward RS, Ricci JF, Brennan DC. The incidence and costs of sepsis and pneumonia before and after renal transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 129 – 139.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaik AS, Dharnidharka VR, Schnitzler MA, et al. Clinical and economic consequences of first‐year urinary tract infections, sepsis, and pneumonia in contemporary kidney transplantation practice. Transpl Int 2016; 29: 241 – 252.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodward RS, Schnitzler MA, Baty J, et al. Incidence and cost of new onset diabetes mellitus among U.S. wait‐listed and transplanted renal allograft recipients. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 590 – 598.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchnitzler MA, Johnston K, Axelrod D, Gheorghian A, Lentine KL. Associations of renal function at 1‐year after kidney transplantation with subsequent return to dialysis, mortality, and healthcare costs. Transplantation 2011; 91: 1347 – 1356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGheorghian A, Schnitzler MA, Axelrod DA, Kalsekar A, L’Italien G, Lentine KL. The implications of acute rejection and reduced allograft function on health care expenditures in contemporary US kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2012; 94: 241 – 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMatas AJ, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2013 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant 2015; 15 ( Suppl 2 ): 1 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenecke C, Biebl M, Pratschke J. Optimizing clinical utilization and allocation of older kidneys. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2015; 20: 431 – 437.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcAdams‐DeMarco MA, Law A, King E, et al. Frailty and mortality in kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 2015; 15: 149 – 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao PS, Merion RM, Ashby VB, Port FK, Wolfe RA, Kayler LK. Renal transplantation in elderly patients older than 70 years of age: Results from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. Transplantation 2007; 83: 1069 – 1074.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSystem USRD. Annual Data Report 2015 [cited 2016 Sept 8]. Available from: http://www.usrds.org/2015/view/Default.aspx.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOrandi BJ, Luo X, Massie AB, et al. Survival benefit with kidney transplants from HLA‐incompatible live donors. N Engl J Med 2016; 374: 940 – 950.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMontgomery RA, Lonze BE, King KE, et al. Desensitization in HLA‐incompatible kidney recipients and survival. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 318 – 326.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLocke JE, Segev DL, Warren DS, Dominici F, Simpkins CE, Montgomery RA. Outcomes of kidneys from donors after cardiac death: Implications for allocation and preservation. Am J Transplant 2007; 7: 1797 – 1807.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ajt14018_am.pdf
Size:
364.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ajt14018.pdf
Size:
205.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.