Show simple item record

Effectiveness of differing levels of support for family meals on obesity prevention among head start preschoolers: the simply dinner study

dc.contributor.authorBrophy-Herb, Holly E
dc.contributor.authorHorodynski, Mildred
dc.contributor.authorContreras, Dawn
dc.contributor.authorKerver, Jean
dc.contributor.authorKaciroti, Niko
dc.contributor.authorStein, Mara
dc.contributor.authorLee, Hannah J
dc.contributor.authorMotz, Brittany
dc.contributor.authorHebert, Sheilah
dc.contributor.authorPrine, Erika
dc.contributor.authorGardiner, Candace
dc.contributor.authorVan Egeren, Laurie A
dc.contributor.authorLumeng, Julie C
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-12T04:21:19Z
dc.date.available2017-02-12T04:21:19Z
dc.date.issued2017-02-10
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):184
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4074-5
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136082
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Despite slight decreases in obesity prevalence in children, nearly 25% of preschool-aged children are overweight or obese. Most interventions focused on promoting family meals as an obesity-prevention strategy target meal planning skills, knowledge and modeling of healthy eating without addressing the practical resources that enable implementation of family meals. There is a striking lack of evidence about what level of resources low-income parents need to implement family meals. This study will identify resources most effective in promoting family meals and, subsequently, test associations among the frequency of family meals, dietary quality and children’s adiposity indices among children enrolled in Head Start. Methods The Multiphase Optimization Strategy, employed in this study, is a cutting-edge approach to maximizing resources in behavioral interventions by identifying the most effective intervention components. We are currently testing the main, additive and interactive effects of 6 intervention components, thought to support family meals, on family meal frequency and dietary quality (Primary Outcomes) as compared to Usual Head Start Exposure in a Screening Phase (N = 512 low-income families). Components yielding the most robust effects will be bundled and evaluated in a two-group randomized controlled trial (intervention and Usual Head Start Exposure) in the Confirming Phase (N = 250), testing the effects of the bundled intervention on children’s adiposity indices (Primary Outcomes; body mass index and skinfolds). The current intervention components include: (1) home delivery of pre-made healthy family meals; (2) home delivery of healthy meal ingredients; (3) community kitchens in which parents make healthy meals to cook at home; (4) healthy eating classes; (5) cooking demonstrations; and (6) cookware/flatware delivery. Secondary outcomes include cooking self-efficacy and family mealtime barriers. Moderators of the intervention include family functioning and food security. Process evaluation data includes fidelity, attendance/use of supports, and satisfaction. Discussion Results will advance fundamental science and translational research by generating new knowledge of effective intervention components more rapidly and efficiently than the standard randomized controlled trial approach evaluating a bundled intervention alone. Study results will have implications for funding decisions within public programs to implement and disseminate effective interventions to prevent obesity in children. Trial registration Clincaltrials.gov Identifier NCT02487251 ; Registered June 26, 2015.
dc.titleEffectiveness of differing levels of support for family meals on obesity prevention among head start preschoolers: the simply dinner study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136082/1/12889_2017_Article_4074.pdf
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.date.updated2017-02-12T04:21:21Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.