Show simple item record

Testing and comparing the effectiveness of different leech repellents.

dc.contributor.authorGoodrow, Zoe
dc.coverage.spatialUMBS Campusen_US
dc.coverage.spatialCrooked Riveren_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-22T16:06:38Z
dc.date.available2017-02-22T16:06:38Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136115
dc.descriptionGeneral Ecologyen_US
dc.description.abstractWe studied the difference in effectiveness among different leech repellents, including eucalyptus oil, insect repellent with DEET, household vinegar, and tobacco leaves. Specifically, we analyzed the differences in percentage of individual Erpobdella ocura attachment and the time distribution of attachments. We recorded the number of attachments to a food source covered in a deterrent and categorized attachments by three equal time intervals for 30 minutes. There was a significant difference in percent attachment between the control and three of the deterrents: eucalyptus oil, tobacco leaves, and insect repellent with DEET (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in deterrence among these three effective treatments. There was a difference in time distribution of attachments among ineffective and effective treatments. These results show a significant difference in the effectiveness of E. obscura deterrence of suggested repellents. The knowledge obtained from these results could be used to draw conclusions on the mechanisms this species uses to hunt prey and could be useful for future ecological studies.
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.haspartGraphen_US
dc.titleTesting and comparing the effectiveness of different leech repellents.en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.contributor.affiliationumBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)en_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136115/1/Goodrow_Zoe_2016.pdf
dc.owningcollnameBiological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.