Testing and comparing the effectiveness of different leech repellents.
dc.contributor.author | Goodrow, Zoe | |
dc.coverage.spatial | UMBS Campus | en_US |
dc.coverage.spatial | Crooked River | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-02-22T16:06:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-02-22T16:06:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136115 | |
dc.description | General Ecology | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | We studied the difference in effectiveness among different leech repellents, including eucalyptus oil, insect repellent with DEET, household vinegar, and tobacco leaves. Specifically, we analyzed the differences in percentage of individual Erpobdella ocura attachment and the time distribution of attachments. We recorded the number of attachments to a food source covered in a deterrent and categorized attachments by three equal time intervals for 30 minutes. There was a significant difference in percent attachment between the control and three of the deterrents: eucalyptus oil, tobacco leaves, and insect repellent with DEET (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference in deterrence among these three effective treatments. There was a difference in time distribution of attachments among ineffective and effective treatments. These results show a significant difference in the effectiveness of E. obscura deterrence of suggested repellents. The knowledge obtained from these results could be used to draw conclusions on the mechanisms this species uses to hunt prey and could be useful for future ecological studies. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.relation.haspart | Graph | en_US |
dc.title | Testing and comparing the effectiveness of different leech repellents. | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Natural Resources and Environment | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Science | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Biological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS) | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136115/1/Goodrow_Zoe_2016.pdf | |
dc.owningcollname | Biological Station, University of Michigan (UMBS) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.