Examining the Relationship Between Age and Instrument Cluster Design Preference
dc.contributor.author | Weiss, Brian Patrick | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Jia, Bochen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-27T19:21:01Z | |
dc.date.available | NO_RESTRICTION | en_US |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-27T19:21:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-04-30 | |
dc.date.submitted | 2016-08-26 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136194 | |
dc.description.abstract | Previous research has indicated that elderly drivers, those aged 65 years and older, find current in-vehicle technology, specifically instrument cluster panel difficult to use. Existing research has determined the source of this discomfort stems from a misalignment between contemporary designs and the designs most usable for elderly drivers. Researchers believe that cognitive ability, which is negatively correlated with age, reduces the driver’s ability to retrieve information from complex instrument cluster designs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate how young (20 to 30 years old) and elderly drivers (65 years old and above) interacted with novel instrument cluster designs, based on how the designs facilitated information retrieval during driving. 50 participants (gender balanced) completed a series of simulated driving tasks to retrieve information from the instrument cluster while driving on two road conditions (city and highway) during a simulated driving. Analysis of variance was used to determine whether designed instrument cluster panels facilitated reading performance, which was measured in the amount of seconds it took participants to retrieve information from the instrument cluster. Additionally, analysis of variance was used to evaluate whether age significantly affected user satisfaction. Our results indicated that designed instrument clusters did not facilitate meter reading for elderly drivers, nor did they elicit higher user satisfaction scores. Age significantly impacted response time. Further analysis also revealed that response time improved in later stages of the experiment, possibly related to the participant learning how to use the driving simulator over the course of the experiment. Future studies could use a longitudinal experiment to minimize the potential learning effect found in this experiment. This study indicated that there should not be novel instrument cluster designs for elderly drivers. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Cluster design | en_US |
dc.subject | Elderly driver | en_US |
dc.subject | Instrument cluster | en_US |
dc.subject | Human factors | en_US |
dc.subject | Driver safety | en_US |
dc.subject | Vehicle technology | en_US |
dc.subject.other | Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science | en_US |
dc.title | Examining the Relationship Between Age and Instrument Cluster Design Preference | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreename | Master of Science in Engineering (MSE) | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreediscipline | Industrial and Systems Engineering, College of Engineering and Computer Science | en_US |
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantor | University of Michigan-Dearborn | en_US |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Zakarian, Armen | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Maxim, Bruce | |
dc.contributor.committeemember | Steiner, Thomas | |
dc.identifier.uniqname | 49702534 | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136194/1/Examining the Relationship Between Age and Instrument Cluster Design Preference.pdf | |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-0489-3622 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of Examining the Relationship Between Age and Instrument Cluster Design Preference.pdf : Thesis | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Weiss, BRIan; 0000-0002-0489-3622 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Dissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.