Show simple item record

Barriers to Resolution in Ideologically Based Negotiations: The Role of Values and Institutions

dc.contributor.authorHoffman, Andrew J.
dc.contributorWade-Benzoni, Kimberly A.
dc.contributorThompson, Leigh
dc.contributorMoore, Don A.
dc.contributorGillespie, James
dc.contributorBazerman, Max H.
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-31T15:22:07Z
dc.date.available2017-03-31T15:22:07Z
dc.date.issued2001-03
dc.identifier1357en_US
dc.identifier.citationAcademy of Management Review, 27 (1): 41-57 Date: March 1, 2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136208
dc.description.abstractWhile traditional behavioral decision theory as applied to negotiation sheds light on some of the barriers encountered in negotiations, it does not fully account for many of the difficulties and failures to reach settlement in ideologically-based disputes. In this paper, we identify a number of factors that differentiate ideologically-based negotiations from other types of negotiation, and advance a perspective that takes into account the value-laden and institutional contexts in which they occur. We illustrate our ideas by applying them to the organizationally relevant example of environmental disputes.en_US
dc.subjectNegotiationsen_US
dc.subjectDispute resolutionen_US
dc.subjectIdeologically based disputesen_US
dc.subjectvaluesen_US
dc.subject.classificationManagement and Organizationsen_US
dc.titleBarriers to Resolution in Ideologically Based Negotiations: The Role of Values and Institutionsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelManagementen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelBusiness
dc.contributor.affiliationumRoss School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDuke University - Fuqua School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNorthwestern University - Kellogg School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of California, Berkeley - Haas School of Businessen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arbor
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136208/1/1357_Hoffman.pdf
dc.owningcollnameBusiness, Stephen M. Ross School of - Working Papers Series


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.