Show simple item record

Carbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon Removal Potentials and Costs

dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Katelyn
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Derek
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Xilin
dc.contributor.authorDeYoung, Carissa
dc.contributor.authorStolberg, Andrew
dc.contributor.advisorBierbaum, Rosina
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-26T15:20:08Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2017-04-26T15:20:08Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-04
dc.identifier315en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136610
dc.description.abstractIn 2015, nearly 190 countries came together in the historic Paris agreement to take action in minimizing the impacts of climate change. However, even with the consensus to cut carbon emissions, the continued trajectory of global emissions will push global temperatures 2°C past pre-industrial temperatures. Implementation of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) options is a way to meet the target. Through an extensive literature review, ten CDR/storage options were examined to gain a better understanding of the current state of research regarding the CDR potential of each option and their relevant costs, as well as the feasibility of their implementation. As we have concluded that all options require significant further research, a second major objective was to highlight where major gaps in research exist in order to help guide further inquiry in CDR options. Every option was examined extensively and presented in an individual chapter. Each chapter presents our findings regarding the CDR/storage potential and economic costs collected for each option. In addition, each chapter includes a discussion of the technical or natural process, geographic restrictions, policy implications, benefits and risks associated with the implementation, as well as recommendations for further research. The biggest takeaways from the literature review is that this set of CDR options offer enough removal potential to warrant equal consideration to other emission reduction measures, all options face limitations and uncertainties so a diverse portfolio of options should be pursued, and implementation should occur in a staged manner, in which options are implemented as they become feasible.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectcarbon dioxide removalen_US
dc.subjectnegative emissionsen_US
dc.subjectclimate changeen_US
dc.subjectCO2en_US
dc.titleCarbon Dioxide Removal Options: A Literature Review Identifying Carbon Removal Potentials and Costsen_US
dc.typeProjecten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science (MS)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNatural Resources and Environmenten_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michiganen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberDeCicco, John
dc.identifier.uniqnamekdjohnsen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamedemartien_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamexilinzhen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnamedeyoungcen_US
dc.identifier.uniqnameastolberen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136610/1/315_CarbonDioxideRemovalOptions.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.