State Laws Related to Family Judges' and Custody Evaluators' Recommendations in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence: Final Summary Overview
dc.contributor.author | Saunders, Daniel G. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-02T04:12:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-02T04:12:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.govdoc | NCJ 250667 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136636 | |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this study is to better understand the relation between family law statutes and professionals’ recommendations for child custody and visitation in intimate partner violence (IPV) cases. Samples consisted of 512 child custody evaluators and 200 judges from 46 states. Survey participants responded to a case vignette of serious intimate partner violence (IPV). In addition, evaluators indicated their history of actual recommendations in IPV cases. Eight child custody laws were related to the custody-visitation outcomes. Based on past research with judges, “friendly parent” laws were included, a standard for custody determination by which parents need to facilitate a good relationship between their children and the other parent. Only a small percentage of the many statistical relationships assessed were significant. When there were laws that exempted IPV cases from friendly parent standards, judges tended to favor victim-supportive outcomes, such as awarding sole custody to victims. These findings generally held when controlling for beliefs about IPV and custody, IPV knowledge acquisition, and background characteristics. In an analysis combining both samples, an overall outcome favoring the abuser was significantly higher in “friendly parent” states, even with the presence of laws presuming the abuser should not have custody. Implications are provided for policies, practice and future research. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | child custody | en_US |
dc.subject | state laws | en_US |
dc.subject | family courts | en_US |
dc.subject | domestic violence | en_US |
dc.subject | intimate partner violence | en_US |
dc.subject | custody evaluations | en_US |
dc.title | State Laws Related to Family Judges' and Custody Evaluators' Recommendations in Cases of Intimate Partner Violence: Final Summary Overview | en_US |
dc.type | Technical Report | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Social Work | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | School of Social Work | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136636/1/Saunders DG 2017 State Laws Related to Judges' & Evaluators' Recommendations in IPV Cases - NIJ Summary .pdf | |
dc.identifier.source | National Criminal Justice Reference Service | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0003-0686-2595 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of Saunders DG 2017 State Laws Related to Judges' & Evaluators' Recommendations in IPV Cases - NIJ Summary .pdf : Report | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Saunders, Daniel G; 0000-0003-0686-2595 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Social Work, School of (SSW) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.