Show simple item record

Microsoft Groove Evaluation Project - Final Report

dc.contributor.authorChang, Yung-Ju
dc.contributor.authorGoetz, Mark
dc.contributor.authorMcCurdy, Kathryn
dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Elaine
dc.contributor.authorShah, Tanuj
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-26T19:56:42Z
dc.date.available2017-05-26T19:56:42Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-26
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136787
dc.descriptionResearch paper for SI 689 CSCW (Computer Supported Cooperative Work) with Dr. Mark Ackermanen_US
dc.description.abstractCan student groups effectively plan and conduct meetings using a collaborative software product? This was our fundamental question as we set out to analyze Microsoft Groove's utility as a meeting tool. Microsoft Groove (or 'Groove') is an application designed to allow distributed teams to collaborate on documents, plan and conduct meetings, and share information. Groove is intended for corporate use, but we were curious to find out how Groove would perform for students, who normally have looser meeting agendas and structure. We decided to conduct ethnographic studies to analyze how student meetings in Groove compared to student meetings in person. Based on our research, findings and user feedback, we developed a set of recommendations that would help Groove become a more productive student group meeting tool. We recommended that Groove increase awareness of other members' activity by implementing desktop sharing capabilities and user status icons. We also suggested that Groove improve its chat tool by enabling side conversations and improving notifications of new chat entries. Finally, we recommended that Groove enhance the meeting tool by improving meeting agenda visibility and design, placing the meeting tool in its own window, and allowing meetings to vary in rigidity and structure. This study suggests that while Groove is not an ideal student group meeting tool, its features can allow groups to communicate through more channels than chat alone. With some usability enhancements, Groove could become a more widely-used collaboration tool among student groups.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectCSCW, computer supported cooperative work, ethnographic study, teams, Microsoft Groove, group meetings, collaboration, comparative analysis, chat, user experience, communicationen_US
dc.titleMicrosoft Groove Evaluation Project - Final Reporten_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInformation and Library Science
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan School of Informationen_US
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampusAnn Arboren_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136787/1/Groove_Evaluation_Final_Report.pdf
dc.description.mapping-1en_US
dc.identifier.orcidorcid.org/0000-0002-2903-885Xen_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of Groove_Evaluation_Final_Report.pdf : Article
dc.identifier.name-orcidMeyer, Elaine; 0000-0002-2903-885Xen_US
dc.owningcollnameInformation, School of (SI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.