Show simple item record

Family planning in refugee settings: findings and actions from a multi-country study

dc.contributor.authorTanabe, Mihoko
dc.contributor.authorMyers, Anna
dc.contributor.authorBhandari, Prem
dc.contributor.authorCornier, Nadine
dc.contributor.authorDoraiswamy, Sathyanarayanan
dc.contributor.authorKrause, Sandra
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-04T03:38:41Z
dc.date.available2017-06-04T03:38:41Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-31
dc.identifier.citationConflict and Health. 2017 May 31;11(1):9
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13031-017-0112-2
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/136880
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background To address family planning for crisis-affected communities, in 2011 and 2012, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the Women’s Refugee Commission undertook a multi-country assessment to document knowledge of family planning, beliefs and practices of refugees, and the state of service provision in the select refugee settings of Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh; Ali Addeh, Djibouti; Amman, Jordan; Eastleigh, Kenya; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; and Nakivale, Uganda. Methods The studies employed mixed methods: a household survey, facility assessments, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions. Results Findings on awareness and demand for family planning, availability, accessibility, and quality of services showed that adult women aged 20–29 years were significantly more likely to be aware, to have ever used, or are currently using a modern method as compared to adolescent girls aged 15–19 years. Facility assessments showed limited availability of certain methods, especially long-acting and permanent methods. Despite availability, in all sites, focus group discussion participants—especially adolescents—reported many accessibility-related barriers to using existing services, including distant service delivery points, cost of transport, lack of knowledge about different types of methods, misinformation and misconceptions, religious opposition, cultural factors, language barriers with providers, and provider biases. Conclusion Based on gaps, partners to the study developed short and long-term recommendations around improving service availability, accessibility, and quality. There remains a need to scale up support for refugees, particularly around adolescent access to family planning services.
dc.titleFamily planning in refugee settings: findings and actions from a multi-country study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/136880/1/13031_2017_Article_112.pdf
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.rights.holderThe Author(s).
dc.date.updated2017-06-04T03:38:42Z
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.