Show simple item record

Investigation of Clinical Characteristics of Men with Chronic Unexplained Orchialgia

dc.contributor.authorQuallich, Susanne
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-14T18:32:36Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTION
dc.date.available2017-06-14T18:32:36Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/137023
dc.description.abstractChronic pain is a public health issue in the United States. Men with chronic unexplained orchialgia (CUO) are an understudied population, with significant knowledge gaps regarding to demographics, etiology, and reliable treatment. This dissertation begins to address these gaps in knowledge, within a framework that presents an organized conceptual view of this chronic pain condition. The dissertation research and interpretation of its results interpretation are guided by the Biopsychosocial Model. This dissertation explored the feasibility of a clinic dedicated to the evaluation and management of adult men with chronic genital pain, but focused on screening for men with CUO. A total of 228 men were screened over 12.5 months; 124 reported chronic genital pain. 104 men had chronic testicular pain that had an identifiable cause; varicocele was the most common diagnosis (n = 55). 20 men had true CUO. This dedicated chronic male genital pain clinic established treatable causes for 84% of men referred for alleged CUO. This represents cost saving for men and healthcare by avoiding unnecessary surgical procedures. The second aspect of this dissertation was a cross-sectional sample case series. All 20 men with CUO were consented; 70% (n = 14) of the men returned a survey packet consisting of 16 standardized psychometric instruments evaluating the multidimensional nature of chronic pain. Instruments were evaluated with a sample of n = 12 in most cases. Demographic characteristics in the sample diverged from what has been previously reported about education and income. The median pain score was 4.00 out of 10 in the sample, with a median pain duration of 38.69 months. Men in the sample did not report urinary symptoms, depression/anxiety, or catastrophizing; instruments did not suggest a specific pain mechanism. Results showed evidence for self-reported dyscognition, fatigue and little belief in their own ability to decrease their pain. None reported a history of sexual trauma. Men reported less interference from chronic pain comorbidities in this sample than anticipated, SF-12 results conflicted with the other survey instruments, showing more impairment. This resaerch is the first to use standardized instruments to evaluate men with CUO. Future research will include replication investigation with a larger sample.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectchronic unexplained orchialgia
dc.subjectnurse practitioner expert
dc.subjectmen's health nurse practitioner
dc.subjectchronic testicular pain clinic
dc.subjectframework that presents in organized conceptual view of men with chronic unexplained orchialgia
dc.titleInvestigation of Clinical Characteristics of Men with Chronic Unexplained Orchialgia
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineNursing
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberMiller, Janis Miriam
dc.contributor.committeememberWilliams, David A
dc.contributor.committeememberArslanian-Engoren, Cynthia M
dc.contributor.committeememberPelletier Cameron, Anne Kathleen
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNursing
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelSurgery and Anesthesiology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137023/1/quallich_1.pdf
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.