View Item 

Show simple item record

Coronary artery perforations after contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions: Evaluation of incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and predictors of mortality
dc.contributor.authorParsh, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorSeth, Milan
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorSutton, Nadia R.
dc.contributor.authorChetcuti, Stanley
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Simon
dc.contributor.authorGrossman, Paul M.
dc.contributor.authorKhandelwal, Akshay
dc.contributor.authorDupree, James M.
dc.contributor.authorGurm, Hitinder S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-16T20:16:41Z
dc.date.available2018-07-09T17:42:25Zen
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifier.citationParsh, Jessica; Seth, Milan; Green, Jacqueline; Sutton, Nadia R.; Chetcuti, Stanley; Dixon, Simon; Grossman, Paul M.; Khandelwal, Akshay; Dupree, James M.; Gurm, Hitinder S. (2017). "Coronary artery perforations after contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions: Evaluation of incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and predictors of mortality." Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 89(6): 966-973.
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.issn1522-726X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/137603
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherhealth care outcomes
dc.subject.othercoronary aneurysm/dissection/perforation
dc.subject.othergender
dc.subject.otheroutcomes/studies
dc.titleCoronary artery perforations after contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions: Evaluation of incidence, risk factors, outcomes, and predictors of mortality
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137603/1/ccd26917_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137603/2/ccd26917.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.26917
dc.identifier.sourceCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Kooiman J, LaLonde T, Grines C, Share D, Seth M. A random forest based risk model for reliable and accurate prediction of receipt of transfusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. PloS One 2014; 9: e96385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShimony A, Joseph L, Mottillo S, Eisenberg MJ. Coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Can J Cardiol 2011; 27: 843 – 850.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStankovic G, Orlic D, Corvaja N, et al. Incidence, predictors, in‐hospital, and late outcomes of coronary artery perforations. Am J Cardiol 2004; 93: 213 – 216.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFasseas P, Orford JL, Panetta CJ, et al. Incidence, correlates, management, and clinical outcome of coronary perforation: Analysis of 16,298 procedures. Am Heart J 2004; 147: 140 – 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShimony A, Zahger D, Van Straten M, et al. Incidence, risk factors, management and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 2009; 104: 1674 – 1677.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAntonsen L, Jensen LO, Terkelsen CJ, et al. Outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians and nonagenarians with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction: From the western Denmark heart registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 81: 912 – 919.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandhu K, Nadar SK. Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly. Int J Cardiol 2015; 199: 342 – 355.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalassi AR, Brilakis ES, Boukhris M, et al. Appropriateness of percutaneous revascularization of coronary chronic total occlusions: An overview. Eur Heart J 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalassi AR, Boukhris M, Azzarelli S, Marza F, Tomasello SD. Percutaneous coronary interventions for chronic total occlusions: More benefit for the patient or for the interventionist’s ego? Can J Cardiol 2015; 31: 974 – 979.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Smith DE, Collins JS, et al. The relative safety and efficacy of abciximab and eptifibatide in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from a large regional registry of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 51: 529 – 535.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMichigan Value Collaborative. Accessed June 1, 2016. Available at: http://michiganvalue.org /
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHerrel L, Syrjamaki JD, Linsell SM, et al. Identifying drivers of episode cost variation with radical prostatectomy. Urology 2016; 97: 105 – 110.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlocum NK, Grossman PM, Moscucci M, et al. The changing definition of contrast‐induced nephropathy and its clinical implications: Insights from the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2). Am Heart J 2012; 163: 829 – 834.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Seth M, Kooiman J, Share D. A novel tool for reliable and accurate prediction of renal complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 2242 – 2248.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBMC2 Collaboration for Quality Improvement. BMC2 PCI‐VIC. Available at: https://bmc2.org/calculators/multi. Accessed May 1, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePCI Risk Assessment Tool. The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Available at: http://www.scai.org/PCIRiskAssessmentTools/default.aspx. Accessed May 1, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArgulian E, Patel AD, Abramson JL, et al. Gender differences in short‐term cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol 2006; 98: 48 – 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis SG, Ajluni S, Arnold AZ, et al. Increased coronary perforation in the new device era. Incidence, classification, management, and outcome. Circulation 1994; 90: 2725 – 2730.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomaguera R, Waksman R. Covered stents for coronary perforations: Is there enough evidence?. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 78: 246 – 253.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ccd26917_am.pdf
Size:
2.663MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ccd26917.pdf
Size:
454.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.