View Item 

Show simple item record

Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients turned down for surgical revascularization
dc.contributor.authorSukul, Devraj
dc.contributor.authorSeth, Milan
dc.contributor.authorDixon, Simon R.
dc.contributor.authorZainea, Mark
dc.contributor.authorSlocum, Nicklaus K.
dc.contributor.authorPielsticker, Elizabeth J.
dc.contributor.authorGurm, Hitinder S.
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-01T19:08:10Z
dc.date.available2018-08-07T15:51:23Zen
dc.date.issued2017-07
dc.identifier.citationSukul, Devraj; Seth, Milan; Dixon, Simon R.; Zainea, Mark; Slocum, Nicklaus K.; Pielsticker, Elizabeth J.; Gurm, Hitinder S. (2017). "Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients turned down for surgical revascularization." Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions 90(1): 94-101.
dc.identifier.issn1522-1946
dc.identifier.issn1522-726X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/137727
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherR Foundation for Statistical Computing
dc.subject.otherpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
dc.subject.othercoronary artery bypass grafting
dc.subject.otherhealth care outcomes
dc.subject.otherrisk stratification
dc.subject.othercoronary artery disease
dc.titleClinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients turned down for surgical revascularization
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137727/1/ccd26781_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/137727/2/ccd26781.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ccd.26781
dc.identifier.sourceCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan PS, Nichol G, Krumholz HM, Spertus JA, Nallamothu BK. American heart association national registry of cardiopulmonary resuscitation investigators. Hospital variation in time to defibrillation after in‐hospital cardiac arrest. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 1265 – 1273.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR, Byrne JG, Cigarroa JE, Disesa VJ, Hiratzka LF, Hutter AM Jr, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2011; 124: 2610 – 2642.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines and the society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions. Circulation 2011; 124: e574 – e651.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMohr FW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Stahle E, Colombo A, Mack MJ, Holmes DR Jr, Morel MA, Van Dyck N, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three‐vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5‐year follow‐up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 629 – 638.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertus JA. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 Appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation appropriate use criteria task force, society for cardiovascular angiography and interventions, society of thoracic surgeons, American association for thoracic surgery, American heart association, American society of nuclear cardiology, and the society of cardiovascular computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 857 – 881.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcNulty EJ, Ng W, Spertus JA, Zaroff JG, Yeh RW, Ren XM, Lundstrom RJ. Surgical candidacy and selection biases in nonemergent left main stenting: Implications for observational studies. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 1020 – 1027.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWaldo SW, Secemsky EA, O’Brien C, Kennedy KF, Pomerantsev E, Sundt TM III, McNulty EJ, Scirica BM, Yeh RW. Surgical ineligibility and mortality among patients with unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 2014; 130: 2295 – 2301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKline‐Rogers E, Share D, Bondie D, Rogers B, Karavite D, Kanten S, Wren P, Bodurka C, Fisk C, McGinnity J, et al. Development of a multicenter interventional cardiology database: The blue cross blue shield of Michigan cardiovascular consortium (BMC2) experience. J Interv Cardiol 2002; 15: 387 – 392.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoscucci M, Rogers EK, Montoye C, Smith DE, Share D, O’Donnell M, Maxwell‐Eward A, Meengs WL, De Franco AC, Patel K, et al. Association of a continuous quality improvement initiative with practice and outcome variations of contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation 2006; 113: 814 – 822.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNCDR CathPCI Registry v4.4 Coder’s Data Dictionary. Available at: https://www.ncdr.com/WebNCDR/docs/public-data-collection-documents/cathpci_v4_codersdictionary_4-4.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed 28 July, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Kooiman J, LaLonde T, Grines C, Share D, Seth M. A random forest based risk model for reliable and accurate prediction of receipt of transfusion in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. PLoS One 2014; 9: e96385.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGurm HS, Seth M, Kooiman J, Share D. A novel tool for reliable and accurate prediction of renal complications in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 2242 – 2248.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. lme4: Linear mixed‐effects models using Eigen and S4. R Package version 1.1‐7; 2014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF III, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med 2009; 150: 604 – 612.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePanaich SS, Badheka AO, Arora S, Patel NJ, Thakkar B, Patel N, Singh V, Chothani A, Deshmukh A, Agnihotri K, et al. Variability in utilization of drug eluting stents in United States: Insights from nationwide inpatient sample. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2016; 87: 23 – 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYeh RW, Rosenfield K, Zelevinsky K, Mauri L, Sakhuja R, Shivapour DM, Lovett A, Weiner BH, Jacobs AK, Normand SL. Sources of hospital variation in short‐term readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 227 – 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShare DA, Campbell DA, Birkmeyer N, Prager RL, Gurm HS, Moscucci M, Udow‐Phillips M, Birkmeyer JD. How a regional collaborative of hospitals and physicians in Michigan cut costs and improved the quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011; 30: 636 – 645.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChu D, Anastacio MM, Mulukutla SR, Lee JS, Smith AJ, Marroquin OC, Sanchez CE, Morell VO, Cook CC, Lico SC, et al. Safety and efficacy of implementing a multidisciplinary heart team approach for revascularization in patients with complex coronary artery disease: An observational cohort pilot study. JAMA Surg 2014; 149: 1109 – 1112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLong J, Luckraz H, Thekkudan J, Maher A, Norell M. Heart team discussion in managing patients with coronary artery disease: Outcome and reproducibility. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2012; 14: 594 – 598.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePasseri JJ, Melnitchouk S, Palacios IF, Sundt TM. Continued expansion of the Heart Team concept. Future Cardiol 2015; 11: 219 – 228.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl‐Haddad MA, Friedlin J, Kesterson J, Waters JA, Aguilar‐Saavedra JR, Schmidt CM. Natural language processing for the development of a clinical registry: A validation study in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms. HPB (Oxford) 2010; 12: 688 – 695.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMurff HJ, FitzHenry F, Matheny ME, Gentry N, Kotter KL, Crimin K, Dittus RS, Rosen AK, Elkin PL, Brown SH, et al. Automated identification of postoperative complications within an electronic medical record using natural language processing. JAMA 2011; 306: 848 – 855.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasfy JH, Singal G, O’Brien C, Blumenthal DM, Kennedy KF, Strom JB, Spertus JA, Mauri L, Normand SL, Yeh RW. Enhancing the prediction of 30‐day readmission after percutaneous coronary intervention using data extracted by querying of the electronic health record. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2015; 8: 477 – 485.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGasparovic H, Kopjar T, Biocina B. Letter by Gasparovic et al. regarding article, “surgical ineligibility and mortality among patients with unprotected left main or multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.” Circulation 2015; 132: e155.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAl Ali J, Franck C, Filion KB, Eisenberg MJ. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with first‐generation drug‐eluting stents: A meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014; 7: 497 – 506.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI) investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 217 – 225.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChieffo A, Magni V, Latib A, Maisano F, Ielasi A, Montorfano M, Carlino M, Godino C, Ferraro M, Calori G, et al. 5‐year outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluting stent implantation versus coronary artery bypass graft for unprotected left main coronary artery lesions the Milan experience. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 595 – 601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeb S, Wijeysundera HC, Ko DT, Tsubota H, Hill S, Fremes SE. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs. percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: A systematic review. JAMA 2013; 310: 2086 – 2095.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFukui T, Tabata M, Tobaru T, Asano R, Takanashi S, Sumiyoshi T. Early and long‐term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with left main disease: Single‐center results of multidisciplinary decision making. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 62: 301 – 307.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamm CW, Reimers J, Ischinger T, Rupprecht HJ, Berger J, Bleifeld W. A randomized study of coronary angioplasty compared with bypass surgery in patients with symptomatic multivessel coronary disease. German Angioplasty Bypass Surgery Investigation (GABI). N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 1037 – 1043.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHannan EL, Zhong Y, Walford G, Holmes DR Jr, Venditti FJ, Berger PB, Jacobs AK, Stamato NJ, Curtis JP, Sharma S, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus drug‐eluting stents for patients with isolated proximal left anterior descending disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 2717 – 2726.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHlatky MA, Boothroyd DB. Comparative effectiveness of multivessel coronary artery bypass graft surgery and multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention. Ann Intern Med 2013; 159: 435.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaik H, White AJ, Chakravarty T, Forrester J, Fontana G, Kar S, Shah PK, Weiss RE, Makkar R. A meta‐analysis of 3,773 patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention or surgery for unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 2: 739 – 747.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark DW, Kim YH, Yun SC, Lee JY, Kim WJ, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Lee CW, Kim JJ, Choo SJ, et al. Long‐term outcomes after stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting for unprotected left main coronary artery disease: 10‐year results of bare‐metal stents and 5‐year results of drug‐eluting stents from the ASAN‐MAIN (ASAN Medical Center‐Left MAIN Revascularization) registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56: 1366 – 1375.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSerruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR, Mack MJ, Stahle E, Feldman TE, van den Brand M, Bass EJ, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary‐artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 961 – 972.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSipahi I, Akay MH, Dagdelen S, Blitz A, Alhan C. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention and long‐term mortality and morbidity in multivessel disease: Meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials of the arterial grafting and stenting era. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 223 – 230.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ccd26781_am.pdf
Size:
1.503MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ccd26781.pdf
Size:
227.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.