View Item 

Show simple item record

Use of Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women with Physical or Sensory Disabilities
dc.contributor.authorWu, Justine P.
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Kimberly S.
dc.contributor.authorMcKee, Michael M.
dc.contributor.authorMeade, Michelle A.
dc.contributor.authorPlegue, Melissa A.
dc.contributor.authorSen, Ananda
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-05T18:16:56Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T15:34:02Zen
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.identifier.citationWu, Justine P.; McKee, Kimberly S.; McKee, Michael M.; Meade, Michelle A.; Plegue, Melissa A.; Sen, Ananda (2017). "Use of Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women with Physical or Sensory Disabilities." Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 49(3): 141-147.
dc.identifier.issn1538-6341
dc.identifier.issn1931-2393
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138241
dc.publisherWiley Subscription Services, Inc.
dc.titleUse of Reversible Contraceptive Methods Among U.S. Women with Physical or Sensory Disabilities
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138241/1/psrh12031.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138241/2/psrh12031_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1363/psrh.12031
dc.identifier.sourcePerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSturm R, The effects of obesity, smoking, and drinking on medical problems and costs, Health Affairs, 2002, 21 ( 2 ): 245 – 253.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization, Obesity and overweight, Fact Sheet, 2016, http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs311/en/.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurtis KM et al., U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2016, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2016, Vol. 65, No. RR‐3.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWu J et al., Contraceptive nonuse among US women at risk for unplanned pregnancy, Contraception, 2008, 78 ( 4 ): 284 – 289.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrost JJ and Darroch JE, Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 2008, 40 ( 2 ): 94 – 104.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHall KS, Trussell J and Schwarz EB, Progestin‐only contraceptive pill use among women in the United States, Contraception, 2012, 86 ( 6 ): 653 – 658.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurtis KM et al., U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2016, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2016, Vol. 65, No. RR‐4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMartin LM et al., Validation of self‐reported chronic conditions and health services in a managed care population, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000, 18 ( 3 ): 215 – 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeWalt DA, Boone RS and Pignone MP, Literacy and its relationship with self‐efficacy, trust, and participation in medical decision making, American Journal of Health Behavior, 2007, 31 ( Suppl. 1 ): S27 – S35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGraham CL and Mann JR, Accessibility of primary care physician practice sites in South Carolina for people with disabilities, Disability and Health Journal, 2008, 1 ( 4 ): 209 – 214.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMudrick NR et al., Physical accessibility in primary health care settings: results from California on‐site reviews, Disability and Health Journal, 2012, 5 ( 3 ): 159 – 167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker H, Stuifbergen A and Tinkle M, Reproductive health care experiences of women with physical disabilities: a qualitative study, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1997, 78(12, Suppl. 5):S26–S33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbells D, Kirkham YA and Ornstein MP, Review of gynecologic and reproductive care for women with developmental disabilities, Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016, 28 ( 5 ): 350 – 358.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeade M et al., Perceptions of provider education and attitude by individuals with spinal cord injury: implications for health care disparities, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 2011, 17 ( 2 ): 25 – 37.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarris Interactive, The ADA, 20 Years Later: Kessler Foundation/NOD Survey of Americans with Disabilities, 2010, https://www.nod.org/downloads/best‐practices/07c_2010_survey_of_americans_with_disabilities_gaps_full_report.pdf.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFox J and Barfield W, Decreasing unintended pregnancy: opportunities created by the Affordable Care Act, JAMA, 2016, 316 ( 8 ): 815 – 816.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiner LB, Sonfield A and Jones RK, Changes in out‐of‐pocket payments for contraception by privately insured women during implementation of the federal contraceptive coverage requirement, Contraception, 2014, 89 ( 2 ): 97 – 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUgwu C, CDC, personal communication, June 21, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIezzoni LI et al., General health, health conditions, and current pregnancy among US women with and without chronic physical disabilities, Disability and Health Journal, 2014, 7 ( 2 ): 181 – 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim M et al., Health disparities among childrearing women with disabilities, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2013, 17 ( 7 ): 1260 – 1268.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWisdom JP et al., Health disparities between women with and without disabilities: a review of the research, Social Work in Public Health, 2010, 25 ( 3–4 ): 368 – 386.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones GC and Bell K, Adverse health behaviors and chronic conditions in working‐age women with disabilities, Family & Community Health, 2004, 27 ( 1 ): 22 – 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNosek MA et al., National Study of Women with Physical Disabilities: final report, Sexuality and Disability, 2001, 19 ( 1 ): 5 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitra M et al., Birth outcomes among U.S. women with hearing loss, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2016, 51 ( 6 ): 865 – 873.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSignore C et al., Pregnancy in women with physical disabilities, Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2011, 117 ( 4 ): 935 – 947.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitra M et al., A perinatal health framework for women with physical disabilities, Disability and Health Journal, 2015, 8 ( 4 ): 499 – 506.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGavin NI, Benedict MB and Adams EK, Health service use and outcomes among disabled Medicaid pregnant women, Women’s Health Issues, 2006, 16 ( 6 ): 313 – 322.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitra M, Manning SE and Lu E, Physical abuse around the time of pregnancy among women with disabilities, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2012, 16 ( 4 ): 802 – 806.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMitra M et al., Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression symptoms among women with disabilities, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2015, 19 ( 2 ): 362 – 372.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Women with disabilities, 2016, http://www.acog.org/About‐ACOG/ACOG‐Departments/Women‐with‐Disabilities.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSinclair LB et al., Tools for improving clinical preventive services receipt among women with disabilities of childbearing ages and beyond, Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2015, 19 ( 6 ): 1189 – 1201.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLepkowski JM et al., Responsive design, weighting, and variance estimation in the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth, Vital and Health Statistics, 2013, Series 2, No. 158.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDaniels K et al., Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013, National Health Statistics Reports, 2015, No. 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Center for Health Statistics, 2011–2013 NSFG: Public use data files, codebooks, and documentation, 2017, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/nsfg_2011_2013_puf.htm.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCenters for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Data guide–disability status and types, 2016, http://dhds.cdc.gov/guides/disability.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCDC, Official MADDSP and MADDS surveillance case definitions, 2015, https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/developmentaldisabilities/casedefinitions.html.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrussell J, Contraceptive failure in the United States, Contraception, 2011, 83 ( 5 ): 397 – 404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCDC, User’s guide appendix 3a: 2011–2013, National Survey of Family Growth female respondent file recode specifications, p. 70, https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nsfg/nsfg_2011‐2013_app3a_femresprecodespecs_v2.pdf.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCDC, Effectiveness of family planning methods, 2011, https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/unintendedpregnancy/pdf/contraceptive_methods_508.pdf.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
psrh12031.pdf
Size:
108.7KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
psrh12031_am.pdf
Size:
279.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.