View Item 

Show simple item record

Meaning‐based coping, chronic conditions and quality of life in advanced cancer & caregiving
dc.contributor.authorEllis, Katrina R.
dc.contributor.authorJanevic, Mary R.
dc.contributor.authorKershaw, Trace
dc.contributor.authorCaldwell, Cleopatra H.
dc.contributor.authorJanz, Nancy K.
dc.contributor.authorNorthouse, Laurel
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-05T18:20:17Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T15:34:04Zen
dc.date.issued2017-09
dc.identifier.citationEllis, Katrina R.; Janevic, Mary R.; Kershaw, Trace; Caldwell, Cleopatra H.; Janz, Nancy K.; Northouse, Laurel (2017). "Meaning‐based coping, chronic conditions and quality of life in advanced cancer & caregiving." Psycho‐Oncology 26(9): 1316-1323.
dc.identifier.issn1057-9249
dc.identifier.issn1099-1611
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138410
dc.description.abstractObjectiveThis study examined the relationship between the number of co‐existing health problems (patient comorbidities and caregiver chronic conditions) and quality of life (QOL) among patients with advanced cancer and their caregivers and assessed the mediating and moderating role of meaning‐based coping on that relationship.MethodsData came from patients with advanced cancers (breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate) and their family caregivers (N = 484 dyads). Study hypotheses were examined with structural equation modeling using the actor‐partner interdependence mediation model. Bootstrapping and model constraints were used to test indirect effects suggested by the mediation models. An interaction term was added to the standard actor‐partner interdependence model to test for moderation effects.ResultsMore patient comorbidities were associated with lower patient QOL. More caregiver chronic conditions were associated with lower patient and caregiver QOL. Patient comorbidities and caregiver chronic conditions had a negative influence on caregiver meaning‐based coping but no significant influence on patient meaning based coping. Caregiver meaning‐based coping mediated relationships between patient comorbidities and caregiver health conditions and patient and caregiver QOL. No significant moderating effects were observed.ConclusionsDespite the severity of advanced cancer for patients and caregivers, the co‐existing health problems of one member of the dyad have the potential to directly or indirectly affect the wellbeing of the other. Future research should consider how the number of patient comorbidities and caregiver chronic conditions, as well as the ability of patients and caregivers to manage those conditions, influences their meaning‐based coping and wellbeing. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
dc.publisherSAGE
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherquality of life
dc.subject.otherpatient/caregiver dyad
dc.subject.otherchronic conditions
dc.subject.otheroncology
dc.subject.othercancer
dc.subject.othermeaning
dc.titleMeaning‐based coping, chronic conditions and quality of life in advanced cancer & caregiving
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138410/1/pon4146_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138410/2/pon4146.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pon.4146
dc.identifier.sourcePsycho‐Oncology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLambert SD, Yoon H, Ellis KR, Northouse LL. Measuring appraisal during advanced cancer: psychometric testing of the appraisal of caregiving scale. Patient Educ Couns 2015; 98: 633 – 639. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.01.0.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMellon SL, Northouse LL, Weiss LK. A population‐based study of the quality of life of cancer survivors and their family caregivers. Cancer Nurs 2006; 29: 120 – 133.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLethborg C, Aranda S, Bloch S, Kissane D. The role of meaning in advanced cancer – integrating the constructs of assumptive world, sense of coherence and meaning‐based coping. J Psychosoc Oncol 2006; 24: 27 – 42. DOI: 10.1300/J077v24n01_03.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranks HM, Roesch SC. Appraisals and coping in people living with cancer: a meta‐analysis. Psycho‐Oncology 2006; 15: 1027 – 1037. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1043.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen CA, Colantonio A, Vernich L. Positive aspects of caregiving: rounding out the caregiver experience. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2002; 17: 184 – 188. DOI: 10.1002/gps.561.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim Y, Baker F, Spillers RL. Cancer caregivers’ quality of life: effects of gender, relationship, and appraisal. J Pain Symptom Manage 2007; 34: 294 – 304. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.11.012.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKramer BJ. Gain in the caregiving experience: Where are we? What next? Gerontologist 1997; 37: 218 – 232. DOI: 10.1093/geront/37.2.218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorthouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psycho‐Oncology 2013; 22: 555 – 563. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3036.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOberst M. Appraisal of Illness Scale (AIS‐Revised): Manual for Use, Wayne State University: Detroit, MI, 1991.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOberst M. Appraisal of Caregiving Scale (ACS‐Revised): Manual for Use, Wayne State University: Detroit, MI, 1991.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 570 – 579.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiven CW, Given B, Stommel M, Collins C, King S, Franklin S. The caregiver reaction assessment (CRA) for caregivers to persons with chronic physical and mental impairments. Res Nurs Health 1992; 15: 271 – 283. DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770150406.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLedermann TS, Macho S, Kenny DA. Assessing mediation in dyadic data using the actor‐partner interdependence model. Struct Equ Modeling 2011; 18: 595 – 612. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2011.607099.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGarcia RL, Kenny DA, Ledermann T. Moderation in the actor–partner interdependence model. Pers Relatsh 2015; 22: 8 – 29. DOI: 10.1111/pere.12060.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide (6th edn) Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA, 1998–2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKenny DA, Kashy DA, Cook WL. Dyadic Data Analysis, Guilford Press: New York, 2006.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6: 1 – 55. DOI: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePitceathly C, Maguire P. The psychological impact of cancer on patients’ partners and other key relatives: a review. Eur J Cancer 2003; 39: 1517 – 1524.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGiven BA, Given CW, Kozachik S. Family support in advanced cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2001; 51: 213 – 231. DOI: 10.3322/canjclin.51.4.213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C. Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psycho‐Oncology 2010; 19: 1013 – 1025. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1670.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoore AM, Gamblin TC, Geller DA, et al. A prospective study of posttraumatic growth as assessed by self‐report and family caregiver in the context of advanced cancer. Psycho‐Oncology 2011; 20: 479 – 487. DOI: 10.1002/pon.17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBayliss EA, Ellis JL, Steiner JF. Subjective assessments of comorbidity correlate with quality of life health outcomes: Initial validation of a comorbidity assessment instrument. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 1 – 8. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-3-51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGijsen R, Hoeymans N, Schellevis FG, Ruwaard D, Satariano WA, van den Bos GAM. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 661 – 674. DOI: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00363-2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdler NE, Rehkopf DH. U.S. disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Annu Rev Public Health 2008; 29: 235 – 252. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.29.020907.090852.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRodriguez AM, Mayo NE, Gagnon B. Independent contributors to overall quality of life in people with advanced cancer. Br J Cancer 2013; 108: 1790 – 1800. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim Y, Given BA. Quality of life of family caregivers of cancer survivors: across the trajectory of the illness. Cancer 2008; 112: 2556 – 2568. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23449.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOgle KS, Swanson GM, Woods N, Azzouz F. Cancer and comorbidity: redefining chronic diseases. Cancer 2000; 88: 653 – 663. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000201)88:3<653::AID-CNCR24>3.0.CO;2-1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith AW, Reeve BB, Bellizzi KM, et al. Cancer, comorbidities, and health‐related quality of life of older adults. Health Care Financ Rev 2008; 29: 41 – 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards BK, Noone AM, Mariotto AB, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 2014; 120: 1290 – 1314. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28509.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaravati‐Jouvenceaux A, Launoy G, Klein D, et al. Health‐related quality of life among long‐term survivors of colorectal cancer: a population‐based study. Oncologist 2011; 16: 1626 – 1636. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2011-0036.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRowland JH, Yancik R. Cancer survivorship: the interface of aging, comorbidity, and quality care. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98: 504 – 505. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomito F, Goldzweig G, Cormio C, Hagedoorn M, Andersen BL. Informal caregiving for cancer patients. Cancer 2013; 119: 2160 – 2169. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28057.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWadhwa D, Burman D, Swami N, Rodin G, Lo C, Zimmermann C. Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psycho‐Oncology 2013; 22: 403 – 410. DOI: 10.1002/pon.2104.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Lange PAM, Rusbult CE. Interdependence theory. In Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology, Van Lange PAM, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET (eds.), SAGE: Los Angeles, 2012; 251 – 272.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMao JJ, Armstrong K, Bowman MA, Xie SX, Kadakia R, Farrar JT. Symptom burden among cancer survivors: impact of age and comorbidity. J Am Board Fam Med 2007; 20: 434 – 443. DOI: 10.3122/jabfm.2007.05.060225.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFortin M, Lapointe L, Hudon C, Vanasse A, Ntetu AL, Maltais D. Multimorbidity and quality of life in primary care: a systematic review. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004; 2:. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7525-2-51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVogeli C, Shields AE, Lee TA, et al. Multiple chronic conditions: prevalence, health consequences, and implications for quality, care management, and costs. J Gen Intern Med 2007; 22: 391 – 395. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBurton LC, Newsom JT, Schulz R, Hirsch CH, German PS. Preventive Health Behaviors among Spousal Caregivers. Prev Med 1997; 26: 162 – 169. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomas C, Morris SM, Harman JC. Companions through cancer: the care given by informal carers in cancer contexts. Soc Sci Med 2002; 54: 529 – 544. DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00048-X.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim Y, Schulz R. Family caregivers’ strains: comparative analysis of cancer caregiving with dementia, diabetes, and frail elderly caregiving. J Aging Health 2008; 20: 483 – 503. DOI: 10.1177/0898264308317533.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWenzel L, Glanz K, Lerman C. Stress, coping and health behavior. In Health Behavior and Health Education, Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (eds.), Jossey‐Bass: San Francisco, 2002; 210 – 239.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
pon4146_am.pdf
Size:
583.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
pon4146.pdf
Size:
176.2KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.