Show simple item record

Ecological Specialization in Predatory Lasiopogon Robber Flies and its Role in Facilitating Diversification and Species Coexistence

dc.contributor.authorMcKnight, Tristan
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-05T20:33:28Z
dc.date.available2017-10-05T20:33:28Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138784
dc.description.abstractNearctic species of Lasiopogon Loew (Diptera: Asilidae) assigned to the bivittatus group by Cannings 2002 are revised, with the description of 13 new species, elevation of 1 subspecies to species, and redescriptions of 13 previously described taxa. Keys to adults are updated, notes on taxonomy, distribution, and ecology are provided, and a Bayesian species tree for 67 species of Lasiopogon is estimated from one mitochondrial (COI) and three nuclear protein-coding loci (AATS, PEPCK, wingless), and compared to the previous phylogeny. The following new species of Lasiopogon are described: L. anaphlecter sp. nov., L. apoecus sp. nov., L. asilomar sp. nov., L. bitumineus sp. nov., L. canningsi sp. nov., L. condylophorus sp. nov., L. esau sp. nov., L. karli sp. nov. (assigned to cinereus group of opaculus section), L. nelsoni sp. nov., L. odontotus sp. nov., L. sierra sp. nov., L. tumulicola sp. nov., L. wilcoxi sp. nov.; L. puyallupi Cole & Wilcox 1938 stat. nov. is elevated from subspecies. Stackelberginia Lehr is proposed as the sister taxon to Lasiopogon based on morphological and genetic evidence, and Stackelberginia cerberus sp.n. is described from the Nevada desert (USA) and compared to congeners. The ecology of 59 Nearctic Lasiopogon species is characterized from museum specimens and field observations, and trait divergences for sympatric and allopatric species are compared. Subclades of the Lasiopogon tree reveal signatures of different ecological processes: the bivittatus and opaculus groups show character displacement for seasonal phenology and perch behavior and environmental filtering for habitats; while species from the other half of the phylogeny show no significant associations with those environmental traits but do have a strong correlation with color. Allopatric species pairs have weaker trait associations than sympatric species pairs, supporting the hypothesis that competitive interactions are shaping ecological divergence in these taxa. Bioclimatic variables do not provide meaningful resolution of species niche differences. Given the complexity of trait divergence in Lasiopogon flies, evolution is likely proceeding along multiple niche axes which require more complex data collection and modeling to reasonably understand.
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.subjectspecies
dc.subjectsystematics
dc.subjectcoexistence
dc.subjectcharacter displacement
dc.subjectentomology
dc.subjectphylogeny
dc.titleEcological Specialization in Predatory Lasiopogon Robber Flies and its Role in Facilitating Diversification and Species Coexistence
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenamePhDen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineEcology and Evolutionary Biology
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies
dc.contributor.committeememberKnowles, L Lacey
dc.contributor.committeememberFoufopoulos, Johannes
dc.contributor.committeememberJames, Timothy Y
dc.contributor.committeememberSmith, Stephen A
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEcology and Evolutionary Biology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGenetics
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNatural Resources and Environment
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138784/1/trismckn_1.pdfen
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-9400-3445
dc.identifier.name-orcidMcKnight, Tristan; 0000-0001-9400-3445en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.