View Item 

Show simple item record

16: A Research‐Based Rubric for Developing Statements of Teaching Philosophy
dc.contributor.authorKaplan, Matthew
dc.contributor.authorMeizlish, Deborah S.
dc.contributor.authorO’Neal, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorWright, Mary C
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-23T17:30:38Z
dc.date.available2017-10-23T17:30:38Z
dc.date.issued2008-06
dc.identifier.citationKaplan, Matthew; Meizlish, Deborah S.; O’Neal, Christopher; Wright, Mary C (2008). "16: A Research‐Based Rubric for Developing Statements of Teaching Philosophy." To Improve the Academy 26(1): 242-262.
dc.identifier.issn2334-4822
dc.identifier.issn2334-4822
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138851
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherNew Forums Press
dc.title16: A Research‐Based Rubric for Developing Statements of Teaching Philosophy
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEducation
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138851/1/tia200512.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/j.2334-4822.2008.tb00512.x
dc.identifier.sourceTo Improve the Academy
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrade, H., & Du, Y. ( 2005, April). Student perspectives on rubric‐referenced assessment. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10 ( 3 ), 1 – 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndrade, H. G. ( 1997 ). Understanding rubrics. Educational Leadership, 54 ( 4 ). Retrieved May 21, 2007, from the Harvard Graduate School of Education, Active Learning Practices for Schools web site: http://learnweb.harvard.edu/ALPS/thinking/docs/rubricar.htm
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChism, N. V. N. ( 1997–1998 ). Developing a philosophy of teaching statement. Essays on Teaching Excellence, 9 ( 3 ) 1 – 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook, C. E., Kaplan, M., Nidiffer, J., & Wright, M. C. ( 2001, March). Preparing future faculty—faster: A crash course guides students to the professoriate. AAHE Bulletin, 54 ( 3 ), 3 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCoppola, B. ( 2000 ). How to write a teaching philosophy for academic employment. American Chemical Society, Department of Career Services Bulletin, 1 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllis, D., & Griffin, G. ( 2000 ). Developing a teaching philosophy statement: A special challenge for graduate students. Journal of Graduate Teaching Assistant Development, 7 ( 1 ), 85 – 92.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoodyear, G. E., & Allchin, D. ( 1998 ). Statements of teaching philosophy. In M. Kaplan & D. Lieberman (Eds.), To improve the academy: Vol. 17. Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (pp. 103 – 121 ). Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeizlish, D. S., & Kaplan, M. ( 2007 ). Valuing and evaluating teaching in academic hiring: A multi‐disciplinary, cross institutional study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMontell, G. ( 2003, March 27). What’s your philosophy on teaching, and does it matter? The Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved May 21, 2007, from http://chronicle.com/jobs/2003/03/2003032701c.htm
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMullinix, B. B. ( 2003 ). A rubric for rubrics. Retrieved May 21, 2007, from the Monmouth University, Faculty Resource Center web site: http://its.monmouth.edu/facultyresourcecenter/Rubrics/A%20Rubric%20for%20Rubrics.htm
dc.identifier.citedreferencePopham, W. J. ( 1997, October). What’s wrong—and what’s right—with rubrics. Educational Leadership, 55 ( 2 ), 72 – 75.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePratt, D. D. ( 2005, January–February). Personal philosophies of teaching: A false promise? Academe, 91 ( 1 ), 32 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchönwetter, D. J., Sokal, L., Friesen, M., & Taylor, K. L. ( 2002, May). Teaching philosophies reconsidered: A conceptual model for the development and evaluation of teaching philosophy statements. International Journal for Academic Development, 7 ( 1 ), 83 – 97.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. ( 2005 ). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
tia200512.pdf
Size:
975.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.