View Item 

Show simple item record

The Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter‐associated thrombosis
dc.contributor.authorChopra, V.
dc.contributor.authorKaatz, S.
dc.contributor.authorConlon, A.
dc.contributor.authorPaje, D.
dc.contributor.authorGrant, P. J.
dc.contributor.authorRogers, M. A. M.
dc.contributor.authorBernstein, S. J.
dc.contributor.authorSaint, S.
dc.contributor.authorFlanders, S. A.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-23T17:30:40Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T15:34:05Zen
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationChopra, V.; Kaatz, S.; Conlon, A.; Paje, D.; Grant, P. J.; Rogers, M. A. M.; Bernstein, S. J.; Saint, S.; Flanders, S. A. (2017). "The Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter‐associated thrombosis." Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 15(10): 1951-1962.
dc.identifier.issn1538-7933
dc.identifier.issn1538-7836
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138853
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othervenous thromboembolism
dc.subject.otherupper extremity
dc.subject.otherthrombosis
dc.subject.otherperipherally inserted central catheter
dc.subject.otherdeep vein thrombosis
dc.titleThe Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter‐associated thrombosis
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138853/1/jth13794_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138853/2/jth13794.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jth.13794
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
dc.identifier.citedreferencePavlou M, Ambler G, Seaman S, Omar RZ. A note on obtaining correct marginal predictions from a random intercepts model for binary outcomes. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 59.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePongruangporn M, Ajenjo MC, Russo AJ, McMullen KM, Robinson C, Williams RC, Warren DK. Patient‐ and device‐specific risk factors for peripherally inserted central venous catheter‐related bloodstream infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013; 34: 184 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRubin D. Multiple imputation in sample surveys‐a phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1978; 20: 20 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, Kapoor WN. A prediction rule to identify low‐risk patients with community‐acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 243 – 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHalbesma N, Jansen DF, Heymans MW, Stolk RP, de Jong PE, Gansevoort RT, PREVEND Study Group. Development and validation of a general population renal risk score. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6: 1731 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBouwmeester W, Twisk JW, Kappen TH, van Klei WA, Moons KG, Vergouwe Y. Prediction models for clustered data: comparison of a random intercept and standard regression model. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013; 13: 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWasson JH, Sox HC, Neff RK, Goldman L. Clinical prediction rules. Applications and methodological standards. N Engl J Med 1985; 313: 793 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrell FE Jr, Lee KL, Mark DB. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 1996; 15: 361 – 87.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteyerberg EW, Vergouwe Y. Towards better clinical prediction models: seven steps for development and an ABCD for validation. Eur Heart J 2014; 35: 1925 – 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuckland ST, Burnham KP, Augustin NH. Model Selection: an integral part of inference. Biometrics 1997; 53: 603 – 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke‐Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837 – 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarnes GD, Kanthi Y, Froehlich JB. Venous thromboembolism: Predicting recurrence and the need for extended anticoagulation. Vasc Med 2015; 20: 143 – 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmin AN, Varker H, Princic N, Lin J, Thompson S, Johnston S. Duration of venous thromboembolism risk across a continuum in medically ill hospitalized patients. J Hosp Med 2012; 7: 231 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeerts W. Central venous catheter‐related thrombosis. ASH Education Book 2014; 1: 306 – 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSteyerberg EW, Harrell FE Jr, Borsboom GJ, Eijkemans MJ, Vergouwe Y, Habbema JD. Internal validation of predictive models: efficiency of some procedures for logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54: 774 – 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMiller ME, Langefeld CD, Tierney WM, Hui SL, McDonald CJ. Validation of probabilistic predictions. Med Decis Making 1993; 13: 49 – 58.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans RS, Sharp JH, Linford LH, Lloyd JF, Tripp JS, Jones JP, Woller SC, Stevens SM, Elliott CG, Weaver LK. Risk of symptomatic DVT associated with peripherally inserted central catheters. Chest 2010; 138: 803 – 10.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans RS, Sharp JH, Linford LH, Lloyd JF, Woller SC, Stevens SM, Elliott CG, Tripp JS, Jones SS, Weaver LK. Reduction of peripherally inserted central catheter‐associated DVT. Chest 2013; 143: 627 – 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarbar S, Noventa F, Rossetto V, Ferrari A, Brandolin B, Perlati M, De Bon E, Tormene D, Pagnan A, Prandoni P. A risk assessment model for the identification of hospitalized medical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism: the Padua Prediction Score. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 2450 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTimsit JF. Scheduled replacement of central venous catheters is not necessary. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2000; 21: 371 – 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarschall J, Mermel LA, Fakih M, Hadaway L, Kallen A, O’Grady NP, Pettis AM, Rupp ME, Sandora T, Maragakis LL, Yokoe DS. Strategies to prevent central line‐associated bloodstream infections in acute care hospitals: 2014 update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2014; 35 ( Suppl. 2 ): S89 – 107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoyston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y. Prognosis and prognostic research: developing a prognostic model. BMJ 2009; 338: b604.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Flanders SA, Saint S, Woller SC, O’Grady NP, Safdar N, Trerotola SO, Saran R, Moureau N, Wiseman S, Pittiruti M, Akl EA, Lee AY, Courey A, Swaminathan L, LeDonne J, Becker C, Krein SL, Bernstein SJ; Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenouse Catheters (MAGIC) Panel. The Michigan Appropriateness Guide for Intravenous Catheters (MAGIC): results From a Multispecialty Panel Using the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163: S1 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiovella C, Dalla Valle F, Trujillo‐Santos J, Pesavento R, Lopez L, Font L, Valle R, Nauffal D, Monreal M, Prandoni P, Investigators R. Comparison of four scores to predict major bleeding in patients receiving anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism: findings from the RIETE registry. Intern Emerg Med 2014; 9: 847 – 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuercini F, Mommi V, Camporese G, Tonello C, Imberti D, Benedetti R, De Bartolomeo G, Di Lecce L, Romeo F, Agnelli G. The management of patients with venous thromboembolism in Italy: insights from the PREFER in VTE registry. Intern Emerg Med. 2016; 11: 1095 – 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalareti G, Cosmi B, Antonucci E, Legnani C, Erba N, Ghirarduzzi A, Poli D, Testa S, Tosetto A, Pengo V, Prandoni P; DULCIS investigators. Duration of anticoagulation after isolated pulmonary embolism. Eur Respir J 2016; 47: 1429 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMustafa S, Stein PD, Patel KC, Otten TR, Holmes R, Silbergleit A. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. Chest 2003; 123: 1953 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFlinterman LE, Van Der Meer FJ, Rosendaal FR, Doggen CJ. Current perspective of venous thrombosis in the upper extremity. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 6: 1262 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Smith S, Swaminathan L, Boldenow T, Kaatz S, Bernstein SJ, Flanders SA. Variations in peripherally inserted central catheter use and outcomes in Michigan hospitals. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176: 548 – 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiem TK, Yanit KE, Moseley SE, Landry GJ, Deloughery TG, Rumwell CA, Mitchell EL, Moneta GL. Peripherally inserted central catheter usage patterns and associated symptomatic upper extremity venous thrombosis. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 761 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaber W, Moua T, Williams EC, Verso M, Agnelli G, Couban S, Young A, De Cicco M, Biffi R, van Rooden CJ, Huisman MV, Fagnani D, Cimminiello C, Moia M, Magagnoli M, Povoski SP, Malak SF, Lee AY. Risk factors for catheter‐related thrombosis (CRT) in cancer patients: a patient‐level data (IPD) meta‐analysis of clinical trials and prospective studies. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9: 312 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Anand S, Hickner A, Buist M, Rogers MA, Saint S, Flanders SA. Risk of venous thromboembolism associated with peripherally inserted central catheters: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Lancet 2013; 382: 311 – 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVerso M, Agnelli G. Venous thromboembolism associated with long‐term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3665 – 75.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLamontagne F, McIntyre L, Dodek P, Heels‐Ansdell D, Meade M, Pemberton J, Skrobik Y, Seppelt I, Vlahakis NE, Muscedere J, Reece G, Ostermann M, Padayachee S, Alhashemi J, Walsh M, Lewis B, Schiff D, Moody A, Zytaruk N, Leblanc M, et al.; Prophylaxis for Thromboembolism in Critical Care Trial I, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group, Australian, New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Nonleg venous thrombosis in critically ill adults: a nested prospective cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174: 689 – 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinters JP, Callas PW, Cushman M, Repp AB, Zakai NA. Central venous catheters and upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in medical inpatients: the Medical Inpatients and Thrombosis (MITH) Study. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13: 2155 – 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreene MT, Spyropoulos AC, Chopra V, Grant PJ, Kaatz S, Bernstein SJ, Flanders SA. Validation of risk assessment models of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Am J Med 1001; 2016: e9 – 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreene MT, Flanders SA, Woller SC, Bernstein SJ, Chopra V. The association between PICC use and venous thromboembolism in upper and lower extremities. Am J Med 2015; 128: e1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrant PJ, Greene MT, Chopra V, Bernstein SJ, Hofer TP, Flanders SA. Assessing the caprini score for risk assessment of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients. Am J Med 2016; 129: 528 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P, Fong A, Burnand B, Luthi JC, Saunders LD, Beck CA, Feasby TE, Ghali WA. Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD‐9‐CM and ICD‐10 administrative data. Med Care 2005; 43: 1130 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Anand S, Krein SL, Chenoweth C, Saint S. Bloodstream infection, venous thrombosis, and peripherally inserted central catheters: reappraising the evidence. Am J Med 2012; 125: 733 – 41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChopra V, Ratz D, Kuhn L, Lopus T, Chenoweth C, Krein S. PICC‐associated bloodstream infections: prevalence, patterns, and predictors. Am J Med 2014; 127: 319 – 28.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jth13794_am.pdf
Size:
291.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jth13794.pdf
Size:
270.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.