Show simple item record

Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians’ Use of Point‐of‐care Ultrasound and Barriers to Implementation: A Regional Pilot Study

dc.contributor.authorGold, Delia L.
dc.contributor.authorMarin, Jennifer R.
dc.contributor.authorHaritos, Demetris
dc.contributor.authorMelissa Skaugset, L.
dc.contributor.authorKline, Jennifer M.
dc.contributor.authorStanley, Rachel M.
dc.contributor.authorWay, David P.
dc.contributor.authorBahner, David P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-23T17:32:11Z
dc.date.available2018-12-03T15:34:05Zen
dc.date.issued2017-10
dc.identifier.citationGold, Delia L.; Marin, Jennifer R.; Haritos, Demetris; Melissa Skaugset, L.; Kline, Jennifer M.; Stanley, Rachel M.; Way, David P.; Bahner, David P. (2017). "Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians’ Use of Point‐of‐care Ultrasound and Barriers to Implementation: A Regional Pilot Study." AEM Education and Training 1(4): 325-333.
dc.identifier.issn2472-5390
dc.identifier.issn2472-5390
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/138938
dc.description.abstractObjectivesPoint‐of‐care ultrasound (POCUS) has been identified as a critical skill for pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians. The purpose of this study was to profile the current status of PEM POCUS in pediatric emergency departments (EDs).MethodsAn electronic survey was distributed to PEM fellows and attending physicians at four major pediatric academic health centers. The 24‐item questionnaire covered professional demographics, POCUS experience and proficiency, and barriers to the use of POCUS in pediatric EDs. We used descriptive and inferential statistics to profile respondent’s PEM POCUS experience and proficiency and Rasch analysis to evaluate barriers to implementation.ResultsOur return rate was 92.8% (128/138). Respondents were attending physicians (68%) and fellows (28%). Most completed pediatric residencies prior to PEM fellowship (83.6%). Almost all had some form of ultrasound education (113/128, 88.3%). Approximately half (46.9%) completed a formal ultrasound curriculum. More than half (53.2%) said their ultrasound education was pediatric‐specific. Most participants (67%) rated their POCUS proficiency low (Levels 1–2), while rating proficiency in other professional competencies (procedures 52%, emergency stabilization 70%) high (Levels 4–5). There were statistically significant differences in POCUS proficiency between those with formal versus informal ultrasound education (p < 0.001) and those from pediatric versus emergency medicine residencies (p < 0.05). Participants identified both personal barriers discomfort with POCUS skills (76.7%), insufficient educational time to learn POCUS (65%), and negative impact of POCUS on efficiency (58.5%)—and institutional barriers to the use of ultrasound‐consultants will not use ultrasound findings from the ED (60%); insufficient mentoring (64.7%), and POCUS not being a departmental priority (57%).ConclusionsWhile POCUS utilization continues to grow in PEM, significant barriers to full implementation still persist. One significant barrier relates to the need for dedicated time to learn and practice POCUS to achieve sufficient levels of proficiency for use in practice.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titlePediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians’ Use of Point‐of‐care Ultrasound and Barriers to Implementation: A Regional Pilot Study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelEmergency Medicine
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138938/1/aet210049_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138938/2/aet210049-sup-0001-SupInfo.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/138938/3/aet210049.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/aet2.10049
dc.identifier.sourceAEM Education and Training
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLenhard A, Lenhard W. Computation of Effect Sizes #4: Calculation of d and r from the Test Statistics of Dependent and Independent t‐tests. Psychometrica Freeware. Available at: https://www.psychometrica.de/effect_size.html. Accessed Mar–Apr 2017
dc.identifier.citedreferencePearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukemia and brain tumors: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380: 499 – 505.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZacharias C, Alessio AM, Otto RK, et al. Pediatric CT: strategies to lower radiation dose. Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200: 950 – 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoske MJ, Applegate KE, Bulas D, et al. Alliance for Radiation Safety in Pediatric Imaging. Image Gently: progress and challenges in CT education and advocacy. Pediatr Radiol 2011; 41: 461 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Brent RL. American Academy of Pediatrics Section on radiology: radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics 2007; 120: 677 – 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Board of Pediatrics. Content Outline—Pediatric Emergency Medicine: Subspecialty In‐Training, Certification, and Maintenance of Certification (MOC) Examinations. Available at: https://www.abp.org/sites/abp/files/pdf/pediatric_emergency_medicine_content_outline.pdf. Accessed Nov 23, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceViera RL, Hsu D, Nagler J, Chen L, Gallagher R, Levy JA. Pediatric emergency medicine fellow training in ultrasound: consensus educational guidelines. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 300 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamirez‐Schrempp D, Dorman DH, Tien I, Liteplo AS. Bedside ultrasound in pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs in the United States: little formal training. Pediatr Emerg Care 2008; 24: 664 – 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRegehr G, Eva K. Self‐assessment, self‐direction, and the self‐regulating professional. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 449: 34 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, the American Board of Pediatrics, and the American Board of Emergency Medicine 2015. The Pediatric Emergency Medicine Milestone Project. Available at: http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/PediatricEmergencyMedicineMilestones.pdf. Accessed Sep 15, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLikert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch Psychol 1932; 140: 1 – 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSalzberger T. Does the Rasch model convert an ordinal scale into an interval scale? Rasch Meas Trans 2010; 24: 1273 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeeson MS, Carter WA, Christopher TA, et al. The development of the emergency medicine milestones. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 20: 724 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeeson MS, Holmboe ES, Korte RC, et al. Initial validity analysis of the emergency medicine milestones. Acad Emerg Med 2013; 22: 838 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBahner DP, Goldman E, Way D, Royall NA, Liu JT. The state of ultrasound education in U.S. medical schools: results of a national survey. Acad Med 2014; 89: 1681 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDinh VA, Fu JY, Lu S, Chiem A, Fox JC, Blaivas M. Integration of ultrasound in medical education at united states medical schools: a national survey of directors’ experiences. J Ultrasound Med 2016; 35: 413 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMosier JM, Malo J, Stolz LA, et al. Critical care ultrasound training: a survey of US fellowship directors. J Crit Care 2014; 29: 645 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKornblith AE, vanSchaik S, Reynolds T. Useful but not used: pediatric critical care physician views on bedside ultrasound. Pediatr Emerg Care 2015; 31: 186 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKruger J, Dunning D. Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self‐assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 1999; 77: 1121 – 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWard M, Gruppen L, Regehr G. Measuring self‐assessment: current state of the art. Adv Health Sci Educ 2002; 7: 63 – 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Harrison RV, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self‐assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA 2006; 296: 1094 – 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoore CL, Copel JA. Current concepts: point‐of‐care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 749 – 57.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoak J. SAEM Endorses the 2008 ACEP Ultrasound guidelines. Available at: http://sinaiem.us/news/saem-endorses-the-2008-acep-ultrasound-guidelines. Accessed Aug 14, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. Recognition of American College of Emergency Physicians Policy Statement “Ultrasound Guidelines: Emergency, Point‐of‐care, and Clinical Ulstrasound Guidelines in Medicine.” Approved November 5, 2011. Available at: www.aium.org/OfficialStatements/45. Accessed Sep 9, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAkhtar S, Theodoro D, Gaspari R, et al. Resident training in emergency ultrasound: consensus recommendations from the 2008 Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors conference. Acad Emerg Med 2009; 16 ( Suppl 2 ): S32 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College Emergency Physicians. Ultrasound guidelines: emergency, point‐of‐care, and clinical ultrasound guidelines. Approved June 2016. Available at: https://www.acep.org/Clinical-Practice-Management/Ultrasound/. Accessed Oct 26, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAccreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the American Board of Emergency Medicine. The Emergency Medicine Milestone Project (2015). Available at: http://www.acgme.org/Portals/0/PDFs/Milestones/EmergencyMedicineMilestones.pdf. Accessed Sep 15, 2016.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcLario DJ, Sivitz AB. Point‐of‐care ultrasound in pediatric clinical care. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169: 594 – 600.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarin JR, Abo AM, Doniger SJ, Fischer JW, Kessler DO, Levy JA, et al. Point‐of‐care ultrasonography by pediatric emergency physicians. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 65: 472 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarin JR, Lewiss RE, Shook JE, et al. Point‐of‐care ultrasonography by pediatric emergency medicine physicians. Pediatrics 2015; 135: e113 – 22.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarin JR, Zuckerbraun NS, Kahn JM. Use of emergency ultrasound in United States pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs in 2011. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31: 1357 – 63.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen JS, Teach SJ, Chapman JI. Bedside ultrasound education in pediatric emergency medicine fellowship programs in the united states. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012; 28: 845 – 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevy JA, Noble VE. Bedside Ultrasound in pediatric emergency medicine. Pediatrics 2008; 121: e1404 – 12.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChamberlain MC, Reid SR, Madhok M. Utilization of emergency ultrasound in pediatric emergency departments. Pediatr Emerg Care 2011; 27: 628 – 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277 – 84.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.