Show simple item record

Review of Michigan's EUDL program

dc.contributor.authorMolnar, Lisa J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKostyniuk, L. P.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMiller, L. L.en_US
dc.contributorUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, Social and Behavioral Analysis Divisionen_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-01-31T22:37:19Z
dc.date.available2006-01-31T22:37:19Z
dc.date.issued2005-10en_US
dc.identifierAccession Number: 99304en_US
dc.identifier.otherReport Number: UMTRI-2005-26en_US
dc.identifier.otherContract Number: JJ-05-13en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/13908
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 36)en_US
dc.description.abstractMichigan’s Enforcing Underage Drinking Laws (EUDL) program for Fiscal Years 2000 -2004 is reviewed through a process evaluation of funded activities, an examination of EUDL strategies and programs in 17 other states, and an assessment of the extent to which Michigan EUDL program can be evaluated with respect to changes in underage drinking behavior. The process evaluation Michigan’s EUDL program indicates that the focus of the program has been on SPOTLIGHT, Operation LOOKOUT, and Party Patrol, through grants which fund these overtime police enforcement activities in a large number of Michigan communities. Program activities, for the most part, were carried out as planned. The review of EUDL strategies and programs in other states shows a wide variety of approaches. However, most states stress the importance of fostering collaboration at both the state and local level, and having a support network in place at, with all of the various involved agencies working together toward a shared and clear vision of what is to be accomplished. The assessment of the extent of “evaluability” indicates that the current mix of EUDL activities in Michigan makes it difficult to identify behavioral changes in drinking because the grants are awarded to a large number of jurisdictions spread across the state for narrowly focused, short term activities. Furthermore, while the data collected on these activities are useful for process evaluations, information is lacking on the underage drinking population and other exposure measures. It is recommended that future EUDL efforts be planned and implemented in concert with appropriate evaluation designs so that impacts of the programs on the amount and frequency of underage drinking and perceptions about alcohol use can be measured in addition to changes in the levels of enforcement activity.en_US
dc.formatill.en_US
dc.format.extent1943 bytes
dc.format.extent384522 bytes
dc.format.mimetypetext/plain
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Instituteen_US
dc.subject.otherEvaluative Methodsen_US
dc.subject.otherYoung Adultsen_US
dc.subject.otherDrinking Driversen_US
dc.subject.otherPolice Enforcementen_US
dc.subject.otherMichiganen_US
dc.subject.otherCommunity Support/ Citizen Participationen_US
dc.subject.otherCampaigns/ Public Information Programsen_US
dc.titleReview of Michigan's EUDL programen_US
dc.typeTechnical Reporten_US
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelTransportationen_US
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelEngineeringen_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/13908/2/99304.pdfen_US
dc.owningcollnameTransportation Research Institute (UMTRI)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.