View Item 

Show simple item record

Hospital Performance on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Process and Outcomes Measures
dc.contributor.authorChui, Philip W.
dc.contributor.authorParzynski, Craig S.
dc.contributor.authorNallamothu, Brahmajee K.
dc.contributor.authorMasoudi, Frederick A.
dc.contributor.authorKrumholz, Harlan M.
dc.contributor.authorCurtis, Jeptha P.
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-13T16:40:50Z
dc.date.available2018-07-09T17:42:25Zen
dc.date.issued2017-05
dc.identifier.citationChui, Philip W.; Parzynski, Craig S.; Nallamothu, Brahmajee K.; Masoudi, Frederick A.; Krumholz, Harlan M.; Curtis, Jeptha P. (2017). "Hospital Performance on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Process and Outcomes Measures." Journal of the American Heart Association (5): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn2047-9980
dc.identifier.issn2047-9980
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/139090
dc.publisherNational Quality Forum
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otheroutcomes
dc.subject.otherprocess measures
dc.subject.otherreadmissions
dc.subject.otherpercutaneous coronary interventions
dc.titleHospital Performance on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Process and Outcomes Measures
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelCardiovascular Medicine
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/139090/1/jah32022_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/139090/2/jah32022.pdf
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of the American Heart Association
dc.identifier.citedreferencePederson SS, Versteeg H, Denollet J, Cheng JM, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT. Patient‐rated health status predicts prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug‐eluding stent. Qual Life Res. 2011; 20: 559 – 567.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoussa I, Hermann A, Messenger JC, Dehmer GJ, Weaver WD, Rumsfeld JS, Masoudi FA. The NCDR CathPCI Registry: a US national perspective on care and outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart. 2013; 99: 297 – 303.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Casey DE, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Ettinger SM, Fang JC, Fesmire FM, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis‐Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST‐elevation myocardial infarction: a reporting of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: e78 – e140.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatel MR, Dehmer GJ, Hirshfeld JW, Smith PK, Spertua JA. ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC/HFSA/SCCT 2012 appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization focused update: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59: 857 – 881.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurtis JP, Drye EE, Duffy SC, Geary LL, Krumholz HM, Partovian SC, Wang Y. Hospital 30‐day readmission following percutaneous coronary intervention measure: measure methodology report. Prepared for Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). New Haven, CT: Yale New Haven Health Services Corporation/Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurtis JP, Geary LL, Wang Y, Chen J, Drye EE, Grosso LM, Spertus JA, Rumsfeld JS, Weintraub WS, Masoudi FA, Brindis RG. Development of 2 registry‐based risk models suitable for characterizing hospital performance on 30‐day all‐cause mortality rates among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012; 5: 628 – 637.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSidak Z. Rectangular confidence regions for the means of multivariate normal distributions. J Am Stat Assoc. 1967; 62: 626 – 633.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner RM, Bradlow ET, Asch DA. Does hospital performance on process measures directly measure high quality care or is it a marker of unmeasured care? Health Serv Res. 2008; 43: 1464 – 1484.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner RM, Bradlow ET. Relationship between Medicare’s hospital compare performance measures and mortality rates. JAMA. 2006; 296: 2694 – 2702.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMant J. Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality in health care. Int J Qual Health Care. 2001; 13: 475 – 480.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHess CN, Rao SV, McCoy LA, Neely ML, Singh M, Spertus JA, Krone RJ, Weaver WD, Peterson ED. Identification of hospital outliers in bleeding complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015; 8: 1 – 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsai TT, Patel UD, Chang TI, Kennedy KF, Masoudi FA, Matheny ME, Kosiborod M, Amin AP, Messenger JC, Rumsfeld JS, Spertus JA. Contemporary incidence, predictors, and outcomes of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the NCDR Cath‐PCI Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014; 7: 1 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Quality Forum (NQF). Composite Measure Evaluation Framework and National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Mortality and Safety—Composite Measures: A Consensus Report. Washington, DC: NQF; 2009.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). AHRQ Quality Indicator: National Quality Forum (NQF) Endorsed Composite and Individual Measures. Columbus, OH: AHRQ; 2011.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterson ED, DeLong ER, Masoudi FA, O’Brien SM, Peterson PN, Rumsfeld JS, Shahian DM, Shaw RE. ACCF/AHA 2010 position statement on composite measures for healthcare performance assessment: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures (Writing Committee to Develop a Position Statement on Composite Measures). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010; 55: 1755 – 1766.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePeterson ED, Roe MT, Mulgund J, DeLong ER, Lytle BL, Brindis RG, Smith SC, Pollack CV, Newby LK, Harrington RA, Gibler WB. Association between hospital process performance and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes. JAMA. 2006; 295: 1912 – 1920.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYeh RW, Rosenfield K, Zelevinsky K, Mauri L, Sakhuja R, Shivapour DM, Lovett A, Weiner BH, Jacobs AK, Normand SL. Sources of hospital variation in short‐term readmission rates after percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012; 5: 227 – 236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBradley EH, Curry L, Horwitz LI, Sipsma H, Wang Y, Walsh MN, Goldmann D, White N, Piña IL, Krumholz HM. Hospital strategies associated with 30‐day readmission rates for patients with heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013; 6: 444 – 450.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTownsend‐Gervis M, Cornell P, Vardaman JM. Interdisciplinary rounds and structured communication reduce readmissions and improve some patient outcomes. West J Nurs Res. 2014; 36: 917 – 928.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKripalani S, Theobald CN, Anctil B, Vasilevskis EE. Reducing hospital admission: current strategies and future directions. Annu Rev Med. 2014; 65: 471 – 485.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurry LA, Spatz E, Cherlin E, Thompson JW, Berg D, Ting HH, Decker C, Krumholz HM, Bradley EH. What distinguishes top‐performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? A qualitative study. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154: 384 – 390.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurtis JP, Minges KE, Cherlin E, Elma MC, Bernheim SM, Messenger J, Ting HH, Berg D, Chen P. A qualitative study of the organizational strategies of high and low‐performing PCI hospitals: insights from TOP PCI. Abstract: Circulation. 2013; 128: A14758.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKlein LW, Ho KKL, Singh M, Anderson HW, Hillegass WB, Uretsky BF, Chambers C, Rao SV, Reilly J, Weiner BH, Kern M, Bailey S. Quality assessment and improvement in interventional cardiology: a Position Statement of the Society of Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Part II: public reporting and risk adjustment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011; 78: 493 – 502.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJoynt KE, Blumenthal DM, Orav J, Resnic FS, Jha AK. Association of public reporting for percutaneous coronary intervention with utilization and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries with acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2012; 308: 1460 – 1468.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTable of cardiovascular project: NQF‐Endorsed maintenance standards under review. National Quality Forum. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Setting_Priorities/Improving_Healthcare_Quality.aspx. Accessed September 16, 2014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNallamothu BK, Tommaso CL, Anderson HV, Anderson JL, Cleveland JC, Dudley A, Duffy PL, Faxon DP, Gurm HS, Hamilton LA, Jensen NC, Josephson RA, Malenka DJ, Maniu CV, McCabe KW, Mortimer JD, Patel MR, Persell SD, Rumsfeld JS, Shunk KA, Smith SC, Stanko SJ, Watts B. ACC/AHA/SCAI/AMA–Convened PCPI/NCQA 2013 performance measures for adults undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on performance measures, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, the American Medical Association–Convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement, and the National Committee for Quality Assurance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63: 722 – 745.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmerican College of Cardiology percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) readmission measure. Medicare.gov: Hospital compare. Available at: http://www.medicare.gov/hospitalcompare/PCIReadmission.html. Accessed September 14, 2014.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKrumholz HM, Keenan PS, Brush JE Jr, Bufalino VJ, Chernew ME, Epstein AJ, Heidenreich PA, Ho V, Masoudi FA, Matchar DB, Normand SL, Rumsfeld JS, Schuur JD, Smith SC Jr, Spertus JA, Walsh MN. Standards for measures used for public reporting of efficiency in health care: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Interdisciplinary Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research and the American College of Cardiology Foundation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008; 52: 1518 – 1526.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHayward RA. Performance measurement in search of a path. N Engl J Med. 2014; 356: 951 – 953.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliams SC, Schmaltz SP, Morton DJ, Koss RG, Loeb JM. Quality of care in US hospitals as reflected by standardized measures, 2002–2004. N Engl J Med. 2005; 353: 255 – 264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerner RM, Bradlow ET. Public reporting on hospital process improvements is linked to better patient outcomes. Health Aff. 2010; 29: 1319 – 1324.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBradley EH, Herrin J, Elbel B, McNamara RL, Magid DJ, Nallamothu BK, Wang Y, Normand ST, Spertus JA, Krumholz HM. Hospital quality for acute myocardial infarction: correlation among process measures and relationship with short‐term mortality. JAMA. 2006; 296: 72 – 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCover story. CathPCI: ACC’s Flagship Registry. National Cardiovascular Data Registry; 2013.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jah32022_am.pdf
Size:
577.9KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jah32022.pdf
Size:
628.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.