From non-uniqueness to the best solution in phonemic analysis: evidence from Chengdu Chinese
dc.contributor.author | Duanmu, San | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-10T04:58:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-10T04:58:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12-10 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lingua Sinica. 2017 Dec 10;3(1):15 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40655-017-0030-7 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/139724 | |
dc.description.abstract | Abstract The “non-uniqueness” theory assumes that there is no best solution in phonemic analysis; rather, competing solutions can co-exist, each having its own advantages (Chao, Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 4: 363–398, 1934). The theory is based on the assumption that there is no common set of criteria to evaluate alternative solutions. I argue instead that such a set of criteria can be established and it is possible to find the best solution. The criteria include riming properties, rime structure, constraints on syllable gaps, phonemic economy, phonetics, syllable sizes, and feature theory. I illustrate the proposal with Chengdu. Four analyses are compared, the “CGV” segmentation, the “CV” segmentation, the “finest” segmentation, and the “CVX” segmentation, and CVX is shown to be the best. | |
dc.title | From non-uniqueness to the best solution in phonemic analysis: evidence from Chengdu Chinese | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/139724/1/40655_2017_Article_30.pdf | |
dc.language.rfc3066 | en | |
dc.rights.holder | The Author(s). | |
dc.date.updated | 2017-12-10T04:58:33Z | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.