Surveying the Scalability of Open Access Monograph Initiatives: Final Report
dc.contributor.author | Barnes, Christopher | |
dc.contributor.author | Welzenbach, Rebecca | |
dc.contributor.author | Folger, Kathleen | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-12-12T23:38:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-12-12T23:38:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-12-12 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/139888 | |
dc.description.abstract | In June of 2016, the University of Michigan Library (MLibrary) and Knowledge Unlatched (KU) announced the start of a collaboration “to study and overcome remaining obstacles to the spread of open access scholarly publishing in the humanities and social sciences.” This survey grew out of that partnership and was designed to gather data useful for determining the scalability of library-supported open access (OA) initiatives focusing on monographs in the Humanities and Social Sciences such as Luminos, Open Book Publishers, and KU. The survey was conducted from 1 December 2016 through 7 February 2017. It was targeted at collections units of academic libraries because the question of scalability for library-funded OA initiatives hinges on issues of budgets, discovery, workflow, and strategic collecting priorities. The population was limited to libraries at four-year colleges and universities in the United States, and respondents were told that they would be answering on behalf of their unit. A total of 103 valid responses were received from academic libraries in 37 states and the District of Columbia. Answers to follow-up questions are included as an appendix. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International | * |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Humanities and Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | Open Access | en_US |
dc.subject | Knowledge Unlatched | en_US |
dc.subject | Monographs | en_US |
dc.subject | Scalability survey | en_US |
dc.title | Surveying the Scalability of Open Access Monograph Initiatives: Final Report | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Information and Library Science | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | Michigan Publishing | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | University of Michigan Library | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationother | Gettysburg College | en_US |
dc.contributor.affiliationumcampus | Ann Arbor | en_US |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/139888/4/OA Monograph Scalability Survey-Final Report.docx | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/139888/5/OA Monograph Scalability Survey-Final Report.pdf | |
dc.description.mapping | 128 | en_US |
dc.identifier.orcid | 0000-0002-9952-4378 | en_US |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of OA Monograph Scalability Survey-Final Report.docx : Report of Survey Findings | |
dc.description.filedescription | Description of OA Monograph Scalability Survey-Final Report.pdf : Report of Survey Findings | |
dc.identifier.name-orcid | Barnes, Christopher A.; 0000-0002-9952-4378 | en_US |
dc.owningcollname | Library (University of Michigan Library) |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.