Show simple item record

Temporal relationship between instantaneous pressure gradients and peak‐to‐peak systolic ejection gradient in congenital aortic stenosis

dc.contributor.authorBoe, Brian A.
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Mark D.
dc.contributor.authorZampi, Jeffrey D.
dc.contributor.authorRocchini, Albert P.
dc.contributor.authorEnsing, Gregory J.
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-15T16:49:09Z
dc.date.available2019-02-01T19:56:26Zen
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.citationBoe, Brian A.; Norris, Mark D.; Zampi, Jeffrey D.; Rocchini, Albert P.; Ensing, Gregory J. (2017). "Temporal relationship between instantaneous pressure gradients and peak‐to‐peak systolic ejection gradient in congenital aortic stenosis." Congenital Heart Disease 12(6): 733-739.
dc.identifier.issn1747-079X
dc.identifier.issn1747-0803
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/140042
dc.description.abstractObjectiveWe sought to identify a time during cardiac ejection when the instantaneous pressure gradient (IPG) correlated best, and near unity, with peak‐to‐peak systolic ejection gradient (PPSG) in patients with congenital aortic stenosis. Noninvasive echocardiographic measurement of IPG has limited correlation with cardiac catheterization measured PPSG across the spectrum of disease severity of congenital aortic stenosis. A major contributor is the observation that these measures are inherently different with a variable relationship dependent on the degree of stenosis.DesignHemodynamic data from cardiac catheterizations utilizing simultaneous pressure measurements from the left ventricle (LV) and ascending aorta (AAo) in patients with congenital valvar aortic stenosis was retrospectively reviewed over the past 5 years. The cardiac cycle was standardized for all patients using the percentage of total LV ejection time (ET). Instantaneous gradient at 5% intervals of ET were compared to PPSG using linear regression and Bland‐Altman analysis.ResultsA total of 22 patients underwent catheterization at a median age of 13.7 years (interquartile range [IQR] 10.3‐18.0) and median weight of 51.1 kg (IQR 34.2‐71.6). The PPSG was 46.5 ± 12.6 mm Hg (mean ± SD) and correlated suboptimally with the maximum and mean IPG. The midsystolic IPG (occurring at 50% of ET) had the strongest correlation with the PPSG (PPSG = 0.97(IPG50%)–1.12, R2 = 0.88), while the IPG at 55% of ET was closest to unity (PPSG = 0.997(IPG55%)–1.17, R2 = 0.87).ConclusionsThe commonly measured maximum and mean IPG are suboptimal estimates of the PPSG in congenital aortic stenosis. Using catheter‐based data, IPG at 50%–55% of ejection correlates well with PPSG. This may allow for a more accurate estimation of PPSG via noninvasive assessment of IPG.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otheraortic stenosis
dc.subject.othercatheterization
dc.subject.othercongenital heart disease
dc.subject.otherechocardiography
dc.titleTemporal relationship between instantaneous pressure gradients and peak‐to‐peak systolic ejection gradient in congenital aortic stenosis
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140042/1/chd12514.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140042/2/chd12514_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/chd.12514
dc.identifier.sourceCongenital Heart Disease
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoffman JI, Christianson R. Congenital heart disease in a cohort of 19,502 births with long‐term follow‐up. Am J Cardiol. 1978; 42 ( 4 ): 641 – 647.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeane JF, Driscoll DJ, Gersony WM, et al. Second natural history study of congenital heart defects. Results of treatment of patients with aortic valvar stenosis. Circulation. 1993; 87 ( suppl 2 ): I16 – I27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeltes TF, Bacha E, Beekman RH, 3rd, et al. Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011; 123 ( 22 ): 2607 – 2652.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright SB, Wienecke MM, Meyer KB, McKay CA, Wiles HB. Correlation of pediatric echocardiographic Doppler and catheter‐derived valvar aortic stenosis gradients and the influence of aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1996; 77 ( 8 ): 663 – 665.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith MD, Dawson PL, Elion JL, et al. Systematic correlation of continuous‐wave Doppler and hemodynamic measurements in patients with aortic stenosis. Am Heart J. 1986; 111 ( 2 ): 245 – 252.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBengur AR, Snider AR, Serwer GA, Peters J, Rosenthal A. Usefulness of the Doppler mean gradient in evaluation of children with aortic valve stenosis and comparison to gradient at catheterization. Am J Cardiol. 1989; 64 ( 12 ): 756 – 761.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVlahos AP, Marx GR, McElhinney D, Oneill S, Goudevenos I, Colan SD. Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children. Pediatr Cardiol. 2008; 29 ( 3 ): 507 – 514.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchlingmann TR, Gauvreau K, Colan SD, Powell AJ. Correction of Doppler gradients for pressure recovery improves agreement with subsequent catheterization gradients in congenital aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28 ( 12 ): 1410 – 1417.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLima VC, Zahn E, Houde C, Smallhorn J, Freedom RM, Benson LN. Non‐invasive determination of the systolic peak‐to‐peak gradient in children with aortic stenosis: validation of a mathematical model. Cardiol Young. 2000; 10 ( 2 ): 115 – 119.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeekman RH, Rocchini AP, Gillon JH, Mancini GB. Hemodynamic determinants of the peak systolic left ventricular‐aortic pressure gradient in children with valvar aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1992; 69 ( 8 ): 813 – 815.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarker PC, Ensing G, Ludomirsky A, Bradley DJ, Lloyd TR, Rocchini AP. Comparison of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements of pressure gradients in congenital aortic valve stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002; 15 ( 12 ): 1496 – 1502.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNiederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, Baumgartner H. Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation. 1996; 94 ( 8 ): 1934 – 1940.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHatle L. Noninvasive assessment and differentiation of left ventricular outflow obstruction with Doppler ultrasound. Circulation. 1981; 64 ( 2 ): 381 – 387.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurrie PJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, et al. Continuous‐wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler‐catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation. 1985; 71 ( 6 ): 1162 – 1169.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKobayashi D, Humes RA. Pressure recovery in congenital aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015; 28 ( 12 ): 1418 – 1419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSmith MD, Dawson PL, Elion JL, et al. Correlation of continuous wave Doppler velocities with cardiac catheterization gradients: an experimental model of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 6 ( 6 ): 1306 – 1314.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.