Show simple item record

Edge Stretch Performance of 6DR1 Aluminum in Typical Automotive Blanking Conditions

dc.contributor.authorKalweit, Nicholas Robert
dc.contributor.advisorKang, HongTae
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-19T18:22:01Z
dc.date.availableNO_RESTRICTIONen_US
dc.date.available2018-01-19T18:22:01Z
dc.date.issued2018-04-29
dc.date.submitted2017-12-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/140762
dc.description.abstractThis work investigates the edge stretch response of 6DR1 aluminum sheet trimmed at various conditions typical in blanking die operation. Three investigatory trimming parameters were studied in the experiment: upper trim edge shape, galling depth, and gap distance in the lower trim tool. Additionally, three other trimming parameters were included in various combinations to each of the investigatory parameters studied: clearance, sample orientation with respect to the rolling direction, and offal support. A sharp lower trim tool edge was maintained for all trimming conditions, as well as blanking die trimming standards of 90° trim angle and no shear angle were strictly adhered to. Electro discharge machined (EDM) custom tensile test specimens, referred to as half-dog bone specimens, were trimmed in a laboratory trimming die with various settings and edge-stretch was measured by total elongation of the trimmed specimens in a tensile test. A regression analysis was performed to determine statistically significant trimming parameters. Optimal trimming conditions were identified by fitting a range of levels for each trimming parameter that maximized elongation to a probability distribution, which provided feasibility from an engineering perspective. Statistical metrics, namely the mean and standard deviation of the distribution, were utilized to identify a robust lower limit expectation of elongation response with optimal trimming conditions. Clearance between upper and lower trim tools had the most significant influence on elongation: as clearance increased, elongation response decreased. Optimal clearance was defined as equal to or less than 30%. As upper trim tool radius increased, elongation response decreased. Optimal radius was defined as equal to or less than 0.14 mm. Galling had a significant reduction effect on elongation, where gall marks with increased penetration depth and length exhibited larger reductions in edge stretch response. Optimal gall depth was defined as equal to or less than 50 𝜇𝑚. Gap distance in the lower trim tool had no statistically significant effect on edge stretch. Measured elongations for optimal trimming conditions followed a left-skewed Weibull distribution with greater statistical probability of low elongation to failure than that predicted with a normal distribution.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectAluminumen_US
dc.subjectStampingen_US
dc.subjectTrimmingen_US
dc.subjectEdge stretchen_US
dc.subjectAutomotiveen_US
dc.subjectBlankingen_US
dc.subject.otherMechanical engineeringen_US
dc.titleEdge Stretch Performance of 6DR1 Aluminum in Typical Automotive Blanking Conditionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreenameMaster of Science in Engineering (MSE)en_US
dc.description.thesisdegreedisciplineMechanical Engineering, College of Engineering & Computer Scienceen_US
dc.description.thesisdegreegrantorUniversity of Michigan-Dearbornen_US
dc.contributor.committeememberKridli, Ghassan
dc.contributor.committeememberReyes-Villanueva, German
dc.contributor.committeememberMallick, Pankaj
dc.identifier.uniqname38491346en_US
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/140762/1/MasterThesisFormalDocument38_5.pdf
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0001-6912-0279en_US
dc.description.filedescriptionDescription of MasterThesisFormalDocument38_5.pdf : Master's Thesis
dc.identifier.name-orcidKalweit, Nicholas; 0000-0001-6912-0279en_US
dc.owningcollnameDissertations and Theses (Ph.D. and Master's)


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.