View Item 

Show simple item record

Effects of Currently Available Surgical and Restorative Interventions on Reducing Midfacial Mucosal Recession of Immediately Placed Singleâ Tooth Implants: A Systematic Review

dc.contributor.authorLin, Guo‐hao
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun‐liang
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:29:06Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:29:06Z
dc.date.issued2014-01
dc.identifier.citationLin, Guo‐hao ; Chan, Hsun‐liang ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2014). "Effects of Currently Available Surgical and Restorative Interventions on Reducing Midfacial Mucosal Recession of Immediately Placed Singleâ Tooth Implants: A Systematic Review." Journal of Periodontology 85(1): 92-102.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141199
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.subject.othersystematic
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.subject.otheresthetics
dc.subject.othergingival recession
dc.subject.otherperiâ implantitis
dc.subject.otherreview
dc.subject.otherDental implantation
dc.titleEffects of Currently Available Surgical and Restorative Interventions on Reducing Midfacial Mucosal Recession of Immediately Placed Singleâ Tooth Implants: A Systematic Review
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumGraduate Periodontics, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPrivate Practice, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Stomatology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141199/1/jper0092.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141199/2/jper0092-sup-0001.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2013.130064
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChung S, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY, Roe P, Lozada JL. Immediate single tooth replacement with subepithelial connective tissue graft using platform switching implants: A case series. J Oral Implantol 2011; 37: 559 â 569.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Kesteren CJ, Schoolfield J, West J, Oates T. A prospective randomized clinical study of changes in soft tissue position following immediate and delayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 562 â 570.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Eghbali A, De Bruyn H, Collys K, Cleymaet R, De Rouck T. Immediate singleâ tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: 3â year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 746 â 753.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Influence of implantâ abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored singleâ tooth implants: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 169 â 178.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsuda H, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY, Roe P, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Periâ implant tissue response following connective tissue and bone grafting in conjunction with immediate singleâ tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: A case series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 427 â 436.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCabello G, Rioboo M, Fábrega JG. Immediate placement and restoration of implants in the aesthetic zone with a trimodal approach: Soft tissue alterations and its relation to gingival biotype. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 1094 â 1100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee YM, Kim DY, Kim JY, et al. Periâ implant soft tissue level secondary to a connective tissue graft in conjunction with immediate implant placement: A 2â year followâ up report of 11 consecutive cases. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012; 32: 213 â 222.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePaul S, Held U. Immediate supracrestal implant placement with immediate temporization in the anterior dentition: A retrospective study of 31 implants in 26 patients with up to 5.5â years followâ up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 24: 710 â 717.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159 â 174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVignoletti F, Discepoli N, Müller A, de Sanctis M, Muñoz F, Sanz M. Bone modelling at fresh extraction sockets: Immediate implant placement versus spontaneous healing: An experimental study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 91 â 97.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoticha T, Fu JH, Chan HL, Wang HL. Influence of thread design on implant positioning in immediate implant placement. J Periodontol 2012; 83: 1420 â 1424.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRungcharassaeng K, Kan JY, Yoshino S, Morimoto T, Zimmerman G. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization with and without a connective tissue graft: An analysis of facial gingival tissue thickness. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012; 32: 657 â 663.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlâ Nsour MM, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effect of the platformâ switching technique on preservation of periâ implant marginal bone: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 138 â 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFickl S, Zuhr O, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler M. Tissue alterations after tooth extraction with and without surgical trauma: A volumetric study in the beagle dog. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 356 â 363.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraújo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 545 â 549.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, et al. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 19 â 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Lin GH, Fu JH, Wang HL. Alterations in bone quality after socket preservation with grafting materials: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: 710 â 720.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTen Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in nonâ molar regions in humans: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 779 â 788.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChu SJ, Salama MA, Salama H, et al. The dualâ zone therapeutic concept of managing immediate implant placement and provisional restoration in anterior extraction sockets. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012; 33: 524 â 532, 534.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRompen E, Raepsaet N, Domken O, Touati B, Van Dooren E. Soft tissue stability at the facial aspect of gingivally converging abutments in the esthetic zone: A pilot clinical study. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97 (Suppl. 6): S119 â S125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSu H, Gonzalezâ Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E. Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: Critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30: 335 â 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTan PL, Dunne JT Jr. An esthetic comparison of a metal ceramic crown and cast metal abutment with an allâ ceramic crown and zirconia abutment: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 215 â 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJung RE, Sailer I, Hämmerle CH, Attin T, Schmidlin P. In vitro color changes of soft tissues caused by restorative materials. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 251 â 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSailer I, Zembic A, Jung RE, Hämmerle CH, Mattiola A. Singleâ tooth implant reconstructions: Esthetic factors influencing the decision between titanium and zirconia abutments in anterior regions. Eur J Esthet Dent 2007; 2: 296 â 310.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Brakel R, Noordmans HJ, Frenken J, de Roode R, de Wit GC, Cune MS. The effect of zirconia and titanium implant abutments on light reflection of the supporting soft tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1172 â 1178.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 1998; 25: 721 â 727.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHämmerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 (Suppl.): 26 â 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC. A prospective clinical study of nonâ submerged immediate implants: Clinical outcomes and esthetic results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 552 â 562.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen ST, Darby IB, Reynolds EC, Clement JG. Immediate implant placement postextraction without flap elevation. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 163 â 172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Rouck T, Collys K, Cosyn J. Immediate singleâ tooth implants in the anterior maxilla: A 1â year case cohort study on hard and soft tissue response. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 649 â 657.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Rouck T, Collys K, Wyn I, Cosyn J. Instant provisionalization of immediate singleâ tooth implants is essential to optimize esthetic treatment outcome. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 566 â 570.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: 1â year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 31 â 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada JL, Zimmerman G. Facial gingival tissue stability following immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: A 2â to 8â year followâ up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 179 â 187.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Sclar A, Lozada JL. Effects of the facial osseous defect morphology on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration: 1â year results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 ( 7,Suppl. 1): 13 â 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrus J, Cecchinato D, Pjetursson EB, Lang NP, Sanz M, Lindhe J. Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 22 â 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoh RU, Oh TJ, Rudek I, et al. Hard and soft tissue changes after crestal and subcrestal immediate implant placement. J Periodontol 2011; 82: 1112 â 1120.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEvans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 73 â 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeibert J, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In: Lindhe J, ed. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology, 2nd edition. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1989: 477 â 514.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCrespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E. A 4â year evaluation of the periâ implant parameters of immediately loaded implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 1629 â 1634.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFu JH, Lee A, Wang HL. Influence of tissue biotype on implant esthetics. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 499 â 508.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of periâ implant mucosa: An evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 557 â 562.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKupershmidt I, Levin L, Schwartzâ Arad D. Interâ implant bone height changes in anterior maxillary immediate and nonâ immediate adjacent dental implants. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 991 â 996.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevin L, Pathael S, Dolev E, Schwartzâ Arad D. Aesthetic versus surgical success of single dental implants: 1â to 9â year followâ up. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:533â 538; quiz 540, 566.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTomasi C, Sanz M, Cecchinato D, et al. Bone dimensional variations at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: A multilevel multivariate analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 30 â 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Roe P, Rungcharassaeng K, et al. Classification of sagittal root position in relation to the anterior maxillary osseous housing for immediate implant placement: A cone beam computed tomography study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 873 â 876.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 (Suppl.): 186 â 217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBotticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hardâ tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 820 â 828.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovani U, Cornelini R, Barone A. Vertical crestal bone changes around implants placed into fresh extraction sockets. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 810 â 815.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, De Bruyn H, Cleymaet R. Soft tissue preservation and pink aesthetics around single immediate implant restorations: A 1â year prospective study [published online ahead of print February 29, 2012]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res doi:10.1111/j.1708â 8208.2012.00448.x.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Clinical, aesthetic, and patientâ related outcome of immediately loaded single implants in the anterior maxilla: A prospective study in extraction sockets, healed ridges, and grafted sites [published online ahead of print January 17, 2012]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res doi:10.1111/j.1708â 8208.2011.00438.x.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBressan E, Paniz G, Lops D, Corazza B, Romeo E, Favero G. Influence of abutment material on the gingival color of implantâ supported allâ ceramic restorations: A prospective multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 631 â 637.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Hooghe N, De Bruyn H. A systematic review on the frequency of advanced recession following single immediate implant treatment. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 582 â 589.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Raes S, De Meyer S, et al. An analysis of the decisionâ making process for single implant treatment in general practice. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 166 â 172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHsu YT, Shieh CH, Wang HL. Using soft tissue graft to prevent midâ facial mucosal recession following immediate implant placement. J Int Acad Periodontol 2012; 14: 76 â 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K. Immediate placement and provisionalization of maxillary anterior single implants: A surgical and prosthodontic rationale. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 2000; 12: 817 â 824, quiz 826.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Morimoto T, Lozada J. Facial gingival tissue stability after connective tissue graft with single immediate tooth replacement in the esthetic zone: Consecutive case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (Suppl. 11): 40 â 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaes F, Cosyn J, Crommelinck E, Coessens P, De Bruyn H. Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1â year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 385 â 394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlock MS, Mercante DE, Lirette D, Mohamed W, Ryser M, Castellon P. Prospective evaluation of immediate and delayed provisional single tooth restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67 (Suppl. 11): 89 â 107.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://www.cochraneâ handbook.org. Accessed January 9, 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 726 â 732.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada. The Newcastleâ Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaâ analyses. Available at: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm. Accessed January 9, 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaâ analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: W65 â W94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChaushu G, Chaushu S, Tzohar A, Dayan D. Immediate loading of singleâ tooth implants: Immediate versus nonâ immediate implantation. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 267 â 272.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHui E, Chow J, Li D, Liu J, Wat P, Law H. Immediate provisional for singleâ tooth implant replacement with BrÃ¥nemark system: Preliminary report. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2001; 3: 79 â 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O, Gelernter I. Healing of marginal defects at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets or after 4â 6 weeks of healing. A comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 410 â 419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovani U, Cornelini R, Barone A. Buccoâ lingual bone remodeling around implants placed into immediate extraction sockets: A case series. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 268 â 273.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBianchi AE, Sanfilippo F. Singleâ tooth replacement by immediate implant and connective tissue graft: A 1â 9â year clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 269 â 277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorton MR. A shortâ term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast singleâ tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 274 â 281.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSclar AG. Strategies for management of singleâ tooth extraction sites in aesthetic implant therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62 ( 9,Suppl. 2): 90 â 105.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVanden Bogaerde L, Rangert B, Wendelhag I. Immediate/early function of BrÃ¥nemark System TiUnite implants in fresh extraction sockets in maxillae and posterior mandibles: An 18â month prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7 (Suppl. 1): S121 â S130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBotticelli D, Renzi A, Lindhe J, Berglundh T. Implants in fresh extraction sockets: A prospective 5â year followâ up clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 1226 â 1232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalli F, Capelli M, Zuffetti F, Testori T, Esposito M. Immediate nonâ occlusal vs. early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients: A multicentre randomized clinical trial. Periâ implant bone and softâ tissue levels. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 546 â 552.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomeo E, Lops D, Rossi A, Storelli S, Rozza R, Chiapasco M. Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with singleâ implant restorations: 1â year prospective study. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1048 â 1055.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCordaro L, Torsello F, Roccuzzo M. Clinical outcome of submerged vs. nonâ submerged implants placed in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1307 â 1313.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCapelli M, Esposito M, Zuffetti F, Galli F, Del Fabbro M, Testroi T. A 5â year report from a multicentre randomised clinical trial: Immediate nonâ occlusal versus early loading of dental implants in partially edentulous patients. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010; 3: 209 â 219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceValentini P, Abensur D, Albertini JF, Rocchesani M. Immediate provisionalization of single extractionâ site implants in the esthetic zone: A clinical evaluation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2010; 30: 41 â 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSuito H, Tomotake Y, Watanabe M, Nagao D, Ishida Y, Ichikawa T. Survival of immediate implant restoration: A retrospective study through 9â yearâ observation. J Prosthodont Res 2011; 55: 141 â 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpinato S, Agnini A, Chiesi M, Agnini AM, Wang HL. Comparison between graft and noâ graft in an immediate placed and immediate nonfunctional loaded implant. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 97 â 103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartzâ Arad D, Chaushu G. Immediate implant placement: A procedure without incisions. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 743 â 750.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGroisman M, Frossard WM, Ferreira HM, de Menezes Filho LM, Touati B. Singleâ tooth implants in the maxillary incisor region with immediate provisionalization: 2â year prospective study. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003;15:115â 122, 124; quiz 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovani U, Crespi R, Cornelini R, Barone A. Immediate implants supporting single crown restoration: A 4â year prospective study. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 982 â 988.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCornelini R, Cangini F, Covani U, Wilson TG Jr. Immediate restoration of implants placed into fresh extraction sockets for singleâ tooth replacement: A prospective clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 439 â 447.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarone A, Rispoli L, Vozza I, Quaranta A, Covani U. Immediate restoration of single implants placed immediately after tooth extraction. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1914 â 1920.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindeboom JA, Frenken JW, Dubois L, Frank M, Abbink I, Kroon FH. Immediate loading versus immediate provisionalization of maxillary singleâ tooth replacements: A prospective randomized study with BioComp implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 936 â 942.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanullo L, Rasperini G. Preservation of periâ implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: A proofâ ofâ concept study with 12â to 36â month followâ up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 995 â 1000.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovani U, Marconcini S, Galassini G, Cornelini R, Santini S, Barone A. Connective tissue graft used as a biologic barrier to cover an immediate implant. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 1644 â 1649.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJuodzbalys G, Wang HL. Soft and hard tissue assessment of immediate implant placement: A case series. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 237 â 243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCornelini R, Barone A, Covani U. Connective tissue grafts in postextraction implants with immediate restoration: A prospective controlled clinical study. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2008; 20: 337 â 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePalattella P, Torsello F, Cordaro L. Twoâ year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 1148 â 1153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanullo L, Iurlaro G, Iannello G. Doubleâ blind randomized controlled trial study on postâ extraction immediately restored implants using the switching platform concept: Soft tissue response. Preliminary report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 414 â 420.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRedemagni M, Cremonesi S, Garlini G, Maiorana C. Soft tissue stability with immediate implants and concave abutments. Eur J Esthet Dent 2009; 4: 328 â 337.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper0092.pdf
Size:
508.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper0092-sup-0001.pdf
Size:
48.91KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.