View Item 

Show simple item record

Comparison of Dermal Matrix and Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for Socket Bone Augmentation: A Clinical and Histologic Study
dc.contributor.authorFotek, Paul D.
dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Rodrigo F.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:29:39Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:29:39Z
dc.date.issued2009-05
dc.identifier.citationFotek, Paul D.; Neiva, Rodrigo F.; Wang, Hom‐lay (2009). "Comparison of Dermal Matrix and Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for Socket Bone Augmentation: A Clinical and Histologic Study." Journal of Periodontology 80(5): 776-785.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141227
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othermembranes
dc.subject.otherpreservation
dc.subject.othersocket
dc.subject.otherBone regeneration
dc.subject.othertooth extraction
dc.subject.othergraft
dc.titleComparison of Dermal Matrix and Polytetrafluoroethylene Membrane for Socket Bone Augmentation: A Clinical and Histologic Study
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPrivate practice, West Palm Beach, FL.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141227/1/jper0776.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2009.080514
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLöe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol 1967; 38 ( Suppl. ): 610 â 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark SH, Wang HL. Management of localized buccal dehiscence defect with allografts and acellular dermal matrix. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 589 â 595.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMinichetti JC, D’Amore JC, Hong AY, Cleveland DB. Human histologic analysis of mineralized bone allograft (Puros) placement before implant surgery. J Oral Implantol 2004; 30: 74 â 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang HL, Tsao YP. Mineralized bone allograftâ plug socket augmentation: Rationale and technique. Implant Dent 2007; 16: 33 â 41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVance GS, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Johnston H, Scheetz JP. Comparison of an allograft in an experimental putty carrier and a bovineâ derived xenograft used in ridge preservation: A clinical and histologic study in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 491 â 497.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFowler EB, Breault LG, Rebitski G. Ridge preservation utilizing an acellular dermal allograft and demineralized freezeâ dried bone allograft: Part I. A report of 2 cases. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1353 â 1359.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, et al. Ridge preservation with freezeâ dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: A clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 990 â 999.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuczyszyn SM, Papalexiou V, Novaes AB Jr., Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba M Jr. Acellular dermal matrix and hydroxyapatite in prevention of ridge deformities after tooth extraction. Implant Dent 2005; 14: 176 â 184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandsberg CJ, Bichacho N. A modified surgical/prosthetic approach for optimal single implant supported crown. Part I â The socket seal surgery. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1994; 6: 11 â 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE, Dietshâ Misch F, Misch CM. A modified socket seal surgery with composite graft approach. J Oral Implantol 1999; 25: 244 â 250.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following singleâ tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12â month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313 â 323.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE. Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol 1990; 7: 9 â 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDonath K, Breuner G. A method for the study of undecalcified bones and teeth with attached soft tissues. The Sageâ Schliff (sawing and grinding) technique. J Oral Pathol 1982; 11: 318 â 326.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRohrer MD, Schubert CC. The cuttingâ grinding technique for histologic preparation of undecalcified bone and boneâ anchored implants. Improvements in instrumentation and procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 73 â 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longâ term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11 â 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: Stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 119 â 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum SJ, Cho SC, Francisco H, Park YS, Elian N, Tarnow DP. Immediate implant placement and provisionalization â Two case reports. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007; 19: 621 â 628.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalgut PN. Compliance with maintenance therapy after periodontal treatment. Dent Health (London) 1991; 30: 3 â 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartee BK. Extraction site reconstruction for alveolar ridge preservation. Part 2: Membraneâ assisted surgical technique. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27: 194 â 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBartee BK. Evaluation of a new polytetrafluoroethylene guided tissue regeneration membrane in healing extraction sites. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998; 19: 1256 â 1258, 1260, 1262â 1264.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212 â 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWoodyard JG, Greenwell H, Hill M, Drisko C, Iasella JM, Scheetz J. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 44 â 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bioâ Oss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 137 â 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThompson DM, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS. Comparison of bone grafting materials in human extraction sockets: Clinical, histologic, and histomorphometric evaluations. Implant Dent 2006; 15: 89 â 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekovic V, Camargo PM, Klokkevold PR, et al. Preservation of alveolar bone in extraction sockets using bioabsorbable membranes. J Periodontol 1998; 69: 1044 â 1049.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSclar AG. Preserving alveolar ridge anatomy following tooth removal in conjunction with immediate implant placement. The Bioâ Col technique. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 1999; 7: 39 â 59.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSclar AG. Strategies for management of singleâ tooth extraction sites in aesthetic implant therapy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62: 90 â 105.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang HL, Kiyonobu K, Neiva RF. Socket augmentation: Rationale and technique. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 286 â 296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeiva RF, Tsao YP, Eber R, Shotwell J, Billy E, Wang HL. Effects of a puttyâ form hydroxyapatite matrix combined with the synthetic cellâ binding peptide Pâ 15 on alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 291 â 299.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDarby I, Chen S, De Poi R. Ridge preservation: What is it and when should it be considered. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 11 â 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, et al. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction. Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol 1997; 68: 563 â 570.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArtzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1: Histomorphometric evaluations at 9 months. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1015 â 1023.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemcovsky CE, Serfaty V. Alveolar ridge preservation following extraction of maxillary anterior teeth. Report on 23 consecutive cases. J Periodontol 1996; 67: 390 â 395.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang HL, Tsao YP. Histologic evaluation of socket augmentation with mineralized human allograft. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 231 â 237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZubillaga G, Von Hagen S, Simon BI, Deasy MJ. Changes in alveolar bone height and width following postâ extraction ridge augmentation using a fixed bioabsorbable membrane and demineralized freezeâ dried bone osteoinductive graft. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 965 â 975.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S, et al. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 19 â 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSkoglund A, Hising P, Young C. A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 194 â 199.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNevins M, Giannobile WV, McGuire MK, et al. Plateletâ derived growth factor stimulates bone fill and rate of attachment level gain: Results of a large multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 2205 â 2215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScarborough NL, White EM, Hughes JV, Manrique AJ, Poser JW. Allograft safety: Viral inactivation with bone demineralization. Contemp Orthop 1995; 31: 257 â 261.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuck BE, Malinin TI, Brown MD. Bone transplantation and human immunodeficiency virus. An estimate of risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Clin Orthop Relat Res 1989; 129 â 136.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMellonig JT, Prewett AB, Moyer MP. HIV inactivation in a bone allograft. J Periodontol 1992; 63: 979 â 983.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsao YP, Neiva R, Alâ Shammari K, Oh TJ, Wang HL. Effects of a mineralized human cancellous bone allograft in regeneration of mandibular Class II furcation defects. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 416 â 425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVastardis S, Yukna RA. Evaluation of allogeneic bone graft substitute for treatment of periodontal osseous defects: 6â month clinical results. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2006; 27: 38 â 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGapski R, Neiva R, Oh TJ, Wang HL. Histologic analyses of human mineralized bone grafting material in sinus elevation procedures: A case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 59 â 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum SJ, Wallace SS, Elian N, Cho SC, Tarnow DP. Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bioâ Oss) for sinus augmentation: Histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 543 â 551.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeonetti JA, Koup R. Localized maxillary ridge augmentation with a block allograft for dental implant placement: Case reports. Implant Dent 2003; 12: 217 â 226.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper0776.pdf
Size:
1.854MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.