View Item 

Show simple item record

ZENK induction in the zebra finch brain by song: Relationship to hemisphere, rhythm, oestradiol and sex
dc.contributor.authorLampen, J.
dc.contributor.authorMcAuley, J. D.
dc.contributor.authorChang, S.‐e.
dc.contributor.authorWade, J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:29:48Z
dc.date.available2019-01-07T18:34:39Zen
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.citationLampen, J.; McAuley, J. D.; Chang, S.‐e. ; Wade, J. (2017). "ZENK induction in the zebra finch brain by song: Relationship to hemisphere, rhythm, oestradiol and sex." Journal of Neuroendocrinology (12): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn0953-8194
dc.identifier.issn1365-2826
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141238
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othernucleus taeniae
dc.subject.othersongbird
dc.subject.othercaudomedial mesopallium
dc.subject.othercaudomedial nidopallium
dc.subject.otherEgrâ 1
dc.subject.otherlateralisation
dc.titleZENK induction in the zebra finch brain by song: Relationship to hemisphere, rhythm, oestradiol and sex
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelNeurosciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141238/1/jne12543.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141238/2/jne12543_am.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jne.12543
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Neuroendocrinology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVoss HU, Tabelow K, Polzehl J, et al. Functional MRI of the zebra finch brain during song stimulation suggests a lateralized response topography. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104: 10667 â 10672.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuenther FH, Ghosh SS, Tourville JA. Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain Lang. 2006; 96: 280 â 301.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTourville JA, Reilly KJ, Guenther FH. Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech. NeuroImage. 2008; 39: 1429 â 1443.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeiser E, Notter M, Gabrieli JD. A corticostriatal neural system enhances auditory perception through temporal context processing. J Neurosci. 2012; 32: 6177 â 6182.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSvec LA, Licht KM, Wade J. Pair bonding in the female zebra finch: a potential role for the nucleus taeniae. Neuroscience. 2009; 160: 275 â 283.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFujii TG, Ikebuchi M, Okanoya K. Auditory responses to vocal sounds in the songbird nucleus taeniae of the amygdala and the adjacent arcopallium. Brain Behav Evol. 2016; 87: 275 â 289.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDziuk PJ, Cook B. Passage of steroids through silicone rubber. Endocrinology. 1966; 78: 208 â 211.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSvec LA, Wade J. Estradiol induces regionâ specific inhibition of ZENK but does not affect the behavioral preference for tutored song in adult female zebra finches. Behav Brain Res. 2009; 199: 298 â 306.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMello CV, Clayton DF. Songâ induced ZENK gene expression in auditory pathways of songbird brain and its relation to the song control system. J Neurosci. 1994; 14: 6652 â 6666.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReplogle K, Arnold AP, Ball GF, et al. The Songbird Neurogenomics (SoNG) Initiative: communityâ based tools and strategies for study of brain gene function and evolution. BMC Genom. 2008; 9: 131.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStokes TM, Leonard CM, Nottebohm F. The telencephalon, diencephalon, and mesencephalon of the canary, Serinus canaria, in stereotaxic coordinates. J Comp Neurol. 1974; 156: 337 â 374.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoupe AJ, Kuhl PK. Birdsong and human speech: common themes and mechanisms. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999; 22: 567 â 631.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoorman S, Gobes SM, Kuijpers M, Kerkhofs A, Zandbergen MA, Bolhuis JJ. Humanâ like brain hemispheric dominance in birdsong learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012; 109: 12782 â 12787.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBell BA, Phan ML, Vicario DS. Neural responses in songbird forebrain reflect learning rates, acquired salience, and stimulus novelty after auditory discrimination training. J Neurophysiol. 2015; 113: 1480 â 1492.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang LM, Vicario DS. Exposure to a novel stimulus environment alters patterns of lateralization in avian auditory cortex. Neuroscience. 2015; 285: 107 â 118.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhan ML, Vicario DS. Hemispheric differences in processing of vocalizations depend on early experience. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 2301 â 2306.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemageâ Healey L, Jeon SD, Joshi NR. Recent evidence for rapid synthesis and action of oestrogens during auditory processing in a songbird. J Neuroendocrinol. 2013; 25: 1024 â 1031.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrube M, Cooper FE, Griffiths TD. Auditory temporalâ regularity processing correlates with language and literacy skill in early adulthood. Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 4: 225 â 230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMuneaux M, Ziegler JC, Truc C, Thomson J, Goswami U. Deficits in beat perception and dyslexia: evidence from French. NeuroReport. 2004; 15: 1255 â 1259.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWieland EA, McAuley JD, Dilley LC, Chang SE. Evidence for a rhythm perception deficit in children who stutter. Brain Lang. 2015; 144: 26 â 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorriveau K, Pasquini E, Goswami U. Basic auditory processing skills and specific language impairment: a new look at an old hypothesis. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007; 50: 647 â 666.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorriveau KH, Goswami U. Rhythmic motor entrainment in children with speech and language impairments: tapping to the beat. Cortex. 2009; 45: 119 â 130.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorton P, Scharff C. â Bird Song Metronomicsâ : isochronous organization of zebra finch song rhythm. Front Neurosci. 2016; 10: 309.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLampen J, Jones K, McAuley JD, Chang SE, Wade J. Arrhythmic song exposure increases ZENK expression in auditory cortical areas and nucleus taeniae of the adult zebra Finch. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e108841.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElie JE, Soula HA, Trouvé C, Mathevon N, Vignal C. Housing conditions and sacrifice protocol affect neural activity and vocal behavior in a songbird species, the zebra finch ( Taeniopygia guttata ). C R Biol. 2015; 338: 825 â 837.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaier T, Guell M, Serrano L. Correlation of mRNA and protein in complex biological samples. FEBS Lett. 2009; 583: 3966 â 3973.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVogel C, Marcotte EM. Insights into the regulation of protein abundance from proteomic and transcriptomic analyses. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13: 227 â 232.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanford SE, Lange HS, Maney DL. Topography of estradiolâ modulated genomic responses in the songbird auditory forebrain. Dev Neurobiol. 2010; 70: 73 â 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Groof G, Balthazart J, Cornil CA, Van der Linden A. Topography and lateralized effect of acute aromatase inhibition on auditory processing in a seasonal songbird. J Neurosci. 2017; 37: 4243 â 4254.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBall GF, Gentner TQ. They’re playing our song: gene expression and birdsong perception. Neuron. 1998; 21: 271 â 274.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNowicki S, Searcy WA. Song function and the evolution of female preferences: why birds sing, why brains matter. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004; 1016: 704 â 723.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYoder KM, Phan ML, Lu K, Vicario DS. He hears, she hears: are there sex differences in auditory processing? Dev Neurobiol. 2015; 75: 302 â 314.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoma KK, Alday NA, Hau M, Schlinger BA. Dehydroepiandrosterone metabolism by 3betaâ hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/Delta5â Delta4 isomerase in adult zebra finch brain: sex difference and rapid effect of stress. Endocrinology. 2004; 145: 1668 â 1677.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWickham LA, Gao J, Toda I, Rocha EM, Ono M, Sullivan DA. Identification of androgen, estrogen and progesterone receptor mRNAs in the eye. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2000; 78: 146 â 153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKobayashi K, Kobayashi H, Ueda M, Honda Y. Estrogen receptor expression in bovine and rat retinas. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998; 39: 2105 â 2110.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBegay V, Valotaire Y, Ravault JP, Collin JP, Falcon J. Detection of estrogen receptor mRNA in trout pineal and retina: estradiolâ 17 beta modulates melatonin production by cultured pineal photoreceptor cells. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1994; 93: 61 â 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarni T, Maggi M, Fantoni G, et al. Sex steroids and odorants modulate gonadotropinâ releasing hormone secretion in primary cultures of human olfactory cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999; 84: 4266 â 4273.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStenberg AE, Wang H, Sahlin L, Hultcrantz M. Mapping of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in the inner ear of mouse and rat. Hear Res. 1999; 136: 29 â 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNoirot IC, Adler HJ, Cornil CA, et al. Presence of aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha in the inner ear of zebra finches. Hear Res. 2009; 252: 49 â 55.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaruska KP, Fernald RD. Steroid receptor expression in the fish inner ear varies with sex, social status, and reproductive state. BMC Neurosci. 2010; 11: 58.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalpurger V, Pietrowsky R, Kirschbaum C, Wolf OT. Effects of the menstrual cycle on auditory eventâ related potentials. Horm Behav. 2004; 46: 600 â 606.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTillman GD. Estradiol levels during the menstrual cycle differentially affect latencies to right and left hemispheres during dichotic listening: an ERP study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010; 35: 249 â 261.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceColeman JR, Campbell D, Cooper WA, Welsh MG, Moyer J. Auditory brainstem responses after ovariectomy and estrogen replacement in rat. Hear Res. 1994; 80: 209 â 215.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGolub MS, Germann SL, Hogrefe CE. Endocrine disruption and cognitive function in adolescent female rhesus monkeys. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 2004; 26: 799 â 809.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaruso S, Maiolino L, Rugolo S, et al. Auditory brainstem response in premenopausal women taking oral contraceptives. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 85 â 89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuenzel WJ, Medina L, Csillag A, Perkel DJ, Reiner A. The avian subpallium: new insights into structural and functional subdivisions occupying the lateral subpallial wall and their embryological origins. Brain Res. 2011; 1424: 67 â 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeimovics SA, Prior NH, Maddison CJ, Soma KK. Rapid and widespread effects of 17betaâ estradiol on intracellular signaling in the male songbird brain: a seasonal comparison. Endocrinology. 2012; 153: 1364 â 1376.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShen P, Campagnoni CW, Kampf K, Schlinger BA, Arnold AP, Campagnoni AT. Isolation and characterization of a zebra finch aromatase cDNA: in situ hybridization reveals high aromatase expression in brain. Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 1994; 24: 227 â 237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalthazart J, Absil P, Foidart A, Houbart M, Harada N, Ball GF. Distribution of aromataseâ immunoreactive cells in the forebrain of zebra finches ( Taeniopygia guttata ): implications for the neural action of steroids and nuclear definition in the avian hypothalamus. J Neurobiol. 1996; 31: 129 â 148.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaldanha CJ, Tuerk MJ, Kim YH, Fernandes AO, Arnold AP, Schlinger BA. Distribution and regulation of telencephalic aromatase expression in the zebra finch revealed with a specific antibody. J Comp Neurol. 2000; 423: 619 â 630.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGahr M, Flugge G, Guttinger HR. Immunocytochemical localization of estrogenâ binding neurons in the songbird brain. Brain Res. 1987; 402: 173 â 177.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJacobs EC, Arnold AP, Campagnoni AT. Zebra finch estrogen receptor cDNA: cloning and mRNA expression. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1996; 59: 135 â 145.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAcharya KD, Veney SL. Characterization of the Gâ proteinâ coupled membraneâ bound estrogen receptor GPR30 in the zebra finch brain reveals a sex difference in gene and protein expression. Dev Neurobiol. 2012; 72: 1433 â 1446.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemageâ Healey L, Maidment NT, Schlinger BA. Forebrain steroid levels fluctuate rapidly during social interactions. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 11: 1327 â 1334.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemageâ Healey L, Dong SM, Chao A, Schlinger BA. Sexâ specific, rapid neuroestrogen fluctuations and neurophysiological actions in the songbird auditory forebrain. J Neurophysiol. 2012; 107: 1621 â 1631.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemageâ Healey L, Coleman MJ, Oyama RK, Schlinger BA. Brain estrogens rapidly strengthen auditory encoding and guide song preference in a songbird. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010; 107: 3852 â 3857.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRemageâ Healey L, Joshi NR. Changing neuroestrogens within the auditory forebrain rapidly transform stimulus selectivity in a downstream sensorimotor nucleus. J Neurosci. 2012; 32: 8231 â 8241.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWade J, Schlinger BA, Hodges L, Arnold AP. Fadrozole: a potent and specific inhibitor of aromatase in the zebra finch brain. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1994; 94: 53 â 61.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManey DL, Cho E, Goode CT. Estrogenâ dependent selectivity of genomic responses to birdsong. Eur J Neurosci. 2006; 23: 1523 â 1529.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceManey DL, Goode CT, Lange HS, Sanford SE, Solomon BL. Estradiol modulates neural responses to song in a seasonal songbird. J Comp Neurol. 2008; 511: 173 â 186.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jne12543.pdf
Size:
531.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jne12543_am.pdf
Size:
403.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.