View Item 

Show simple item record

Elatinaceae are sister to Malpighiaceae; Peridiscaceae belong to Saxifragales
dc.contributor.authorDavis, Charles C.
dc.contributor.authorChase, Mark W.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:30:58Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:30:58Z
dc.date.issued2004-02
dc.identifier.citationDavis, Charles C.; Chase, Mark W. (2004). "Elatinaceae are sister to Malpighiaceae; Peridiscaceae belong to Saxifragales ." American Journal of Botany 91(2): 262-273.
dc.identifier.issn0002-9122
dc.identifier.issn1537-2197
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141309
dc.publisherBotanical Society of America
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherPeridiscus
dc.subject.otherPHYC
dc.subject.otherElatine
dc.subject.otherWhittonia
dc.subject.otherBergia
dc.subject.otherSaxifragales
dc.subject.otherMalpighiales
dc.subject.otherndhF
dc.titleElatinaceae are sister to Malpighiaceae; Peridiscaceae belong to Saxifragales
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBotany
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan Herbarium, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108‐2287 USA;
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMolecular Systematics Section, Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS UK
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141309/1/ajb20262.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141309/2/ajb20262-sup-0001.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.3732/ajb.91.2.262
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Botany
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSlowinski, J. B., and C. Guyer. 1989. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: an improved null model. American Naturalist 134: 907 – 921.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanderson, M. J., and M. J. Donoghue. 1994. Shifts in diversification rate with the origin of angiosperms. Science 264: 1590 – 1593.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanderson, M. J., and M. F. Wojciechowski. 1996. Diversification rates in a temperate legume clade: are there “so many species” of Astragalus (Fabaceae)?. American Journal of Botany 83: 1488 – 1502.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSandwith, N. Y.. 1962. A new genus of Peridiscaceae. Kew Bulletin 15: 467 – 471.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSavolainen, V., M. W. Chase, S. B. Hoot, C. M. Morton, D. E. Soltis, C. Bayer, M. F. Fay, A. Y. de Bruijn, S. Sullivan, and Y.‐L. Qiu. 2000a. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based on combined analysis of plastid atpB and rbcL gene sequences. Systematic Biology 49: 306 – 362.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSavolainen, V., et. al. 2000b. Phylogeny of the eudicots: a nearly complete familial analysis based on rbcL gene sequences. Kew Bulletin 55: 257 – 309.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSims, H. J., and K. J. McConway. 2003. Nonstochastic variation of species‐level diversification within angiosperms. Evolution 57: 460 – 479.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevon Wettstein, R. R.. 1935. Handbuch der Systematischen Botanik. F. Deuticke, Leipzig, Germany.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoltis, D. E., and P. S. Soltis. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships in Saxifragaceae sensu lato: a comparison of topologies based on 18S rDNA and rbcL sequences. American Journal of Botany 84: 504 – 522.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoltis, D. E., et. al. 2000. Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB sequences. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 133: 381 – 461.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoltis, D. E., et. al. 2003. Gunnerales are sister to other core eudicots: implications for the evolution of pentamery. American Journal of Botany 90: 461 – 470.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSwofford, D. L.. 2000. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), ver. 4. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakhtajan, A. L.. 1980. Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta). Botanical Review 46: 225 – 359.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakhtajan, A. L.. 1997. Diversity and classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor, D. W., and W. Crepet. 1987. Fossil floral evidence of Malpighiaceae and an early plant–pollinator relationship. American Journal of Botany 74: 274 – 286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorne, R. F.. 1976. A phylogenetic classification of the Angiospermae. Evolutionary Biology 9: 35 – 106.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorne, R. F.. 1983. Proposed new realignments in the angiosperms. Nordic Journal of Botany 3: 85 – 117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorne, R. F.. 1992a. Classification and geography of the flowering plants. Botanical Review 58: 225 – 348.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorne, R. F.. 1992b. An updated phylogenetic classification of flowering plants. Aliso 13: 365 – 389.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTucker, G. C.. 1986. The genera of Elatinaceae in the southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 67: 471 – 483.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVega, A. S., M. A. Castro, and W. R. Anderson. 2002. Occurrence and phylogenetic significance of latex in Malpighiaceae. American Journal of Botany 89: 1725 – 1729.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVogel, S.. 1974. Ölblumen und ölsammelnde Bienen. Tropische und subtropische Pflanzenwelt 7: 283 – 547.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVogel, S.. 1990. History of the Malpighiaceae in the light of pollination ecology. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 55: 130 – 142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalia, K., and R. N. Kapl. 1965. Embryology of Frankenia Linn. with some comments on the systematic position of the Frankeniaceae. Botaniska Notiser 118: 412 – 429.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhitten, W. M., N. H. Williams, and M. W. Chase. 2000. Subtribal and generic relationships of Maxillarieae (Orchidaceae) with emphasis on Stanhopeinae: combined molecular evidence. American Journal of Botany 87: 1842 – 1856.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWurdack, K. J.. 2002. Molecular systematics and evolution of Euphorbiaceae sensu lato. Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA (University Microfilms #3047094).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWurdack, K. J., and J. W. Horn. 2001. A re‐evaluation of the affinities of the Tepuianthaceae: molecular and morphological evidence for placement in the Malvales. American Journal of Botany. Abstract (264).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdanson, M.. 1764. Familles des plantes, vol. 2, 250 – 257. Vincent, Paris, France.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbach, D. C., D. E. Soltis, M. W. Chase, and P. S. Soltis. 2001. Phylogenetic placement of the enigmatic angiosperm Hydrostachys. Taxon 50: 781 – 805.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, W. R.. 1978 [“1977”]. Byrsonimoideae, a new subfamily of the Malpighiaceae. Leandra 7: 5 – 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, W. R.. 1979. Floral conservatism in neotropical Malpighiaceae. Biotropica 11: 219 – 223.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, W. R.. 1982. Notes on neotropical Malpighiaceae—I. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 15: 93 – 136.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, W. R.. 1987. Notes on neotropical Malpighiaceae—II. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 16: 49 – 108.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, W. R.. 1990. The origin of the Malpighiaceae—the evidence from morphology. Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 64: 210 – 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnderson, W. R.. 1993. Chromosome numbers of neotropical Malpighiaceae. Contributions from the University of Michigan Herbarium 19: 341 – 354.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAPG [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group]. 1998. An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85: 531 – 553.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAPG [Angiosperm Phylogeny Group]. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141: 399 – 436.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBentham, G., and J. D. Hooker. 1862. Genera plantarum, vol. 1, part 1. Reeve, London, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBessey, C. E.. 1915. The phylogenetic taxonomy of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 2: 109 – 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCambessèdes, J.. 1829. Note sur les Èlatinées, nouvelle famille des plantes. Paris, France.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCameron, K. M., M. W. Chase, W. R. Anderson, and H. G. Hills. 2001. Molecular systematics of Malpighiaceae: evidence from plastid rbcL and matK sequences. American Journal of Botany 88: 1847 – 1862.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlquist, S.. 1984. Wood and stem anatomy of Bergia suffruticosa: relationships of Elatinaceae and broader significance of vascular tracheids, vasicentric tracheids and fibriform vessel elements. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 71: 232 – 242.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChase, M. W., S. Zmarzty, M. D. Lledó, K. J. Wurdack, S. M. Swensen, and M. F. Fay. 2002. When in doubt, put it in Flacourtiaceae: a molecular phylogenetic analysis based on plastid rbcL DNA sequences. Kew Bulletin 57: 141 – 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChase, M. W., et. al. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: an analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbc L. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 80: 528 – 580.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConti, E., A. Litt, and K. J. Sytsma. 1996. Circumscription of Myrtales and their relationships to other rosids: evidence from rbcL sequence data. American Journal of Botany 83: 221 – 233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCook, C. D. K.. 1990. Aquatic plant book. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCorner, E. J. H.. 1976. The seeds of dicotyledons, vol. 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCronquist, A.. 1981. An integrated system of classification of flowering plants. Columbia University Press, New York, New York, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDahlgren, R.. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 80: 91 – 124.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, C. C.. 2002. Madagasikaria (Malpighiaceae): a new genus from Madagascar with implications for floral evolution in Malpighiaceae. American Journal of Botany 89: 723 – 730.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, C. C., W. R. Anderson, and M. J. Donoghue. 2001. Phylogeny of Malpighiaceae: evidence from chloroplast ndhF and trnL‐F nucleotide sequences. American Journal of Botany 88: 1830 – 1846.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, C. C., C. D. Bell, P. F. Fritsch, and S. Mathews. 2002a. Phylogeny of Acridocarpus ‐ Brachylophon (Malpighiaceae): implications for Tertiary tropical floras and Afroasian biogeography. Evolution 56: 2395 – 2405.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavis, C. C., C. D. Bell, S. Mathews, and M. J. Donoghue. 2002a. Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: evidence from Malpighiaceae. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 99: 6833 – 6837.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Candolle, A. P.. 1824. Prodromus systematis naturalis regni vegetabilis, vol. 1. Treuttel and Würtz, Paris, France.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Jussieu, A. L.. 1789. Genera plantarum secundum ordines naturales disposita. Herissant, Paris, France.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelsenstein, J.. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783 – 791.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFishbein, M., C. Hibsch‐Jetter, D. E. Soltis, and L. Hufford. 2001. Phylogeny of Saxifragales (angiosperms, eudicots): analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. Systematic Biology 50: 817 – 847.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFitch, W. M.. 1971. Toward defining the course of evolution: minimum change for a specific tree topology. Systematic Zoology 20: 406 – 416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGray, A.. 1849. Genera florae americae boreali‐orientalis illustrata, vol. 1. G. P. Putnam, New York, New York, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuyer, C., and J. B. Slowinski. 1993. Adaptive radiations and the topology of large phylogenies. Evolution 47: 253 – 263.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmgren, P. K., N. H. Holmgren, and L. C. Barnett. 1990. Index herbariorum. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoot, S. B., A. Culham, and P. R. Crane. 1995. The utility of atpB gene sequences in resolving phylogenetic relationships: comparison with rbcL and 18S ribosomal DNA sequences in the Lardizabalaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 194 – 207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHowe, G. T., P. A. Bucciaglia, G. R. Furnier, W. P. Hackett, M.‐M. Cordonnier‐Pratt, and G. Gardner. 1998. Evidence that the phytochrome gene family in black cottonwood has one PHYA locus and two PHYB loci but lacks members of the PHYC/F and PHYE subfamilies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 15: 160 – 175.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchinson, J.. 1926. The families of flowering plants, arranged according to a new system based on their probable phylogeny, vol. 1, dicotyledons. Macmillan, London, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchinson, J.. 1959. The families of flowering plants, arranged according to a new system based on their probable phylogeny, vol. 1, dicotyledons. Clarendon, Oxford, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLeach, G. J.. 1989. Taxonomic revision of Bergia (Elatinaceae) in Australia. Journal of the Adelaide Botanical Gardens 11: 75 – 100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLitt, A., and M. W. Chase. 1999. The systematic position of Euphronia, with comments on the position of Balanops: an analysis based on rbcL sequence data. Systematic Botany 23: 401 – 409.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMelikian, A. P., and B. I. Dildarian. 1977. Comparative anatomical and palynological study of representatives of Elatinaceae family. Biologicheskii Zhurnal Armenii 30: 44 – 49.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMetcalfe, C. R.. 1962. Notes on the systematic anatomy of Whittonia and Peridiscus. Kew Bulletin 15: 472 – 474.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMooers, A. Ø., and S. B. Heard. 1997. Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Quarterly Review of Biology 72: 31 – 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMooers, A. Ø., and S. B. Heard. 2002. Using tree shape. Systematic Biology 51: 833 – 834.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeff, J. L., and B. B. Simpson. 1981. Oil‐collecting structures in the Anthophoridae (Hymenoptera): morphology, function and use in systematics. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 54: 95 – 123.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNickrent, D. L., A. Blarer, Y.‐L. Qiu, D. E. Soltis, P. S. Soltis, and M. Zanis. 2002. Molecular data place Hydnoraceae with Aristolochiaceae. American Journal of Botany 89: 1809 – 1817.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNiedenzu, F.. 1925. Elatinaceae. In A. Engler and K. Prantl Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, 2nd ed., vol. 21, 270 – 276. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePhilbrick, C. T., and D. H. Les. 1996. Evolution of aquatic angiosperm reproductive systems. BioScience 46: 813 – 826.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReeves, G., M. W. Chase, P. Goldblatt, P. Rudall, M. F. Fay, A. V. Cox, B. Lejeune, and T. Souza‐Chies. 2001. Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: evidence from four plastid DNA regions. American Journal of Botany 88: 2074 – 2087.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ajb20262.pdf
Size:
253.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
ajb20262-sup-0001.pdf
Size:
156.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.