View Item 

Show simple item record

Are Short Dental Implants (<10 mm) Effective? A Metaâ Analysis on Prospective Clinical Trials
dc.contributor.authorMonje, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun‐liang
dc.contributor.authorFu, Jia‐hui
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGalindo‐moreno, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:33:03Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:33:03Z
dc.date.issued2013-07
dc.identifier.citationMonje, Alberto; Chan, Hsun‐liang ; Fu, Jia‐hui ; Suarez, Fernando; Galindo‐moreno, Pablo ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2013). "Are Short Dental Implants (<10 mm) Effective? A Metaâ Analysis on Prospective Clinical Trials." Journal of Periodontology 84(7): 895-904.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141410
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherAlveolar bone loss
dc.subject.otherevidenceâ based dentistry
dc.subject.otherlongitudinal studies
dc.subject.othersurvival rate
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.titleAre Short Dental Implants (<10 mm) Effective? A Metaâ Analysis on Prospective Clinical Trials
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral Surgery, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141410/1/jper0895.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2012.120328
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIvanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, Rangert B, Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 141 â 148.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuljé F, Raghoebar GM, Ter Meulen JW, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Mandibular overdentures supported by 6â mm dental implants: A 1â year prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14 ( Suppl. 1 ): e59 â e66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Assche N, Michels S, Quirynen M, Naert I. Extra short dental implants supporting an overdenture in the edentulous maxilla: A proof of concept. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 567 â 576.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following singleâ tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12â month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313 â 323.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Brooks SL, Fu JH, Yeh CY, Rudek I, Wang HL. Crossâ sectional analysis of the mandibular lingual concavity using cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 201 â 206.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandeweghe S, De Ferrerre R, Tschakaloff A, De Bruyn H. A wideâ body implant as an alternative for sinus lift or bone grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: e67 â e74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 22 â 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNkenke E, Weisbach V, Winckler E, et al. Morbidity of harvesting of bone grafts from the iliac crest for preprosthetic augmentation procedures: A prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33: 157 â 163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, Wright RF. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 377 â 381.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMeijer HJ, Kuiper JH, Starmans FJ, Bosman F. Stress distribution around dental implants: Influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 96 â 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: Influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A threeâ dimensional finiteâ element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 486 â 494.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: A metaâ analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 856 â 863.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLe Guéhennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 844 â 854.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, Danelli S. A histomorphometric evaluation of screwâ shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998; 9: 11 â 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S. Inferior alveolar nerve transposition in conjunction with implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 610 â 620.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. The role of implant surface modifications, shape and material on the success of osseointegrated dental implants. A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005; 13: 15 â 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE, Dietshâ Misch F, Hoar J, Beck G, Hazen R, Misch CM. A bone qualityâ based implant system: First year of prosthetic loading. J Oral Implantol 1999; 25: 185 â 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: A 3â dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 357 â 368.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porousâ surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20: 476 â 485.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: A 2â year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7 ( Suppl. 1 ): S104 â S110.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWidmark G, Andersson B, Carlsson GE, Lindvall AM, Ivanoff CJ. Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts: A 3â to 5â year followâ up clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 73 â 79.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 1997; 23: 104 â 111.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 798 â 804.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBischof M, Nedir R, Abi Najm S, Szmuklerâ Moncler S, Samson J. A fiveâ year lifeâ table analysis on wide neck ITI implants with prosthetic evaluation and radiographic analysis: Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 512 â 520.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi T, Kong L, Wang Y, et al. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: A threeâ dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 1077 â 1083.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSahin S, Cehreli MC, Yalçin E. The influence of functional forces on the biomechanics of implantâ supported prostheses â A review. J Dent 2002; 30: 271 â 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Mischâ Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: A multicenter retrospective 6â year case series study. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1340 â 1347.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 17: 21 â 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: A systematic review of the literature [published online ahead of print Oct 26, 2010]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/j.1708â 8208.2010.00303.x.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark SH, Lee KW, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Shotwell J, Wang HL. Effect of absorbable membranes on sandwich bone augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 32 â 41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(Suppl. 3):226â 231; discussion 232â 233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOh TJ, Meraw SJ, Lee EJ, Giannobile WV, Wang HL. Comparative analysis of collagen membranes for the treatment of implant dehiscence defects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 80 â 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Cannizzaro G, Soardi E, et al. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mmâ long, 4 mmâ wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2012; 5: 19 â 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFelice P, Soardi E, Pellegrino G, et al. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla: Short implants versus bone augmentation for placing longer implants. Fiveâ month postâ loading results of a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2011; 4: 191 â 202.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen OT, Adams MW. The maxillary Mâ 4: A technical and biomechanical note for allâ onâ 4 management of severe maxillary atrophy â Report of 3 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 1739 â 1744.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJensen OT, Adams MW. Allâ onâ 4 treatment of highly atrophic mandible with mandibular Vâ 4: Report of 2 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 1503 â 1509.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 272 â 281.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakahashi T, Shimamura I, Sakurai K. Influence of number and inclination angle of implants on stress distribution in mandibular cortical bone with Allâ onâ 4 Concept. J Prosthodont Res 2010; 54: 179 â 184.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePieri F, Aldini NN, Fini M, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla using short implants or sinus augmentation with simultaneous standardâ length implant placement: A 3â year randomized clinical trial [published online ahead of print March 15, 2012]. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/j.1708â 8208.2012.00451.x.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTelleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 667 â 676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriberg B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U, BrÃ¥nemark PI. Longâ term followâ up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short BrÃ¥nemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 184 â 189.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17 ( Suppl. 2 ): 35 â 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferencedas Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants â An analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 86 â 93.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJokstad A. The evidence for endorsing the use of short dental implants remains inconclusive. Evid Based Dent 2011; 12: 99 â 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnnibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 25 â 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (â ¤ 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 816 â 825.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChuang SK, Cai T. Predicting clustered dental implant survival using frailty methods. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 1147 â 1151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNedir R, Bischof M, Szmuklerâ Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 520 â 528.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 275 â 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Rangert B. Short implants placed oneâ stage in maxillae and mandibles: A retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of followâ up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9: 15 â 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceten Bruggenkate CM, Asikainen P, Foitzik C, Krekeler G, Sutter F. Short (6â mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: Results of a multicenter clinical trial of 1 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 791 â 798.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeporter D, Watson P, Pharoah M, Levy D, Todescan R. Fiveâ to sixâ year results of a prospective clinical trial using the ENDOPORE dental implant and a mandibular overdenture. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 95 â 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolizzi G, Rangert B, Lekholm U, Gualini F, Lindström H. BrÃ¥nemark System Wide Platform implants for single molar replacement: Clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 61 â 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallman M. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: Results after 1 year of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 731 â 736.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Del Fabbro M, Feldman S, et al. A multicenter prospective evaluation of 2â months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3â year followâ up results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 154 â 161.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGlumphy EA, Peterson LJ, Larsen PE, Jeffcoat MK. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatiteâ coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 82 â 92.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiller J, Noack N, Hoffmann J. Survival rate of IMZ implants: A prospective 10â year analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 691 â 695.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmuklerâ Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7â year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 150 â 157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S. Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation: A 12â year lifeâ table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 194 â 205.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chiapasco M, Lops D. Short (8â mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: A 3â to 14â year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 586 â 592.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6â mmâ long implants with a moderately rough surface: A prospective 2â year followâ up cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 937 â 943.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper0895.pdf
Size:
834.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.