Show simple item record

Direct Visualization of Formylpeptide Receptor Binding on Rounded and Polarized Human Neutrophils: Cellular and Receptor Heterogeneity

dc.contributor.authorWalter, Robert J.
dc.contributor.authorMarasco, Wayne A.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:36:04Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:36:04Z
dc.date.issued1987-05
dc.identifier.citationWalter, Robert J.; Marasco, Wayne A. (1987). "Direct Visualization of Formylpeptide Receptor Binding on Rounded and Polarized Human Neutrophils: Cellular and Receptor Heterogeneity." Journal of Leukocyte Biology 41(5): 377-391.
dc.identifier.issn0741-5400
dc.identifier.issn1938-3673
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141552
dc.description.abstractWe have used light microscope autoradiography to visualize binding of the formylhexa‐peptide, N‐formyl‐norleucyl‐leucyl‐phenylalanyl‐norleucyl‐(125l)tyrosyl‐lysine to rounded and spontaneously polarized human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. These cells possess receptors known to bind with high specificity and great avidity to the chemotactic formylpeptides. Cells adherent to glass slides were exposed to (125I)‐hexapeptide at 4°, fixed, and autoradiographed. Hexapeptide binding was studied over the biologically active range of peptide concentrations varying from 0.63 nM to 10 nM and autoradiographic silver grains counted on 200 rounded or 50 polarized cells at each concentration. Examination of histograms plotted from these data revealed for rounded cells: 1) two major peaks at each concentration indicating the existence of two neutrophil subpopulations, the predominant subpopulation binding one‐half as much formylpeptide (peak I) as the other (peak II); 2) progressively increasing proportions of cells in peak II as the free hexapeptide concentration increased. Accordingly, at 0.63 nM hexapeptide, peak II comprised only 8% of the total cell number, whereas at 10 nM, this peak represented 35% of the total cells. This suggested that different types of receptors may exist in the two cell subpopulations (high/low affinity or high/low negative cooperativity) and that these receptor types were expressed differentially on these subpopulations. Thus, cellular heterogeneity within the neutrophil population and receptor heterogeneity among hexapeptide receptors on an individual cell were both observed here. Each of these may significantly affect neutrophil functional responses to the chemotactic formylpeptides and may explain, at least in part, the curvilinearity in the Scatchard plots of formylpeptide receptor binding that has recently been reported.At higher concentrations of peptide (5 nM), spontaneously polarized PMN bound hexapeptide more or less uniformly over the entire cell surface. However, at lower concentrations, hexapeptide binding was markedly shifted toward the cell anterior. As a group, polarized PMN bound similar total quantities of hexapeptide, as did rounded PMN at each peptide concentration tested. Receptors displaying high‐ and low‐affinity characteristics were, however, distributed asymmetrically over the cell surface, with the high‐affinity type receptors predominantly on the anterior one‐half of the cell. Such an asymmetric distribution may serve to initiate or perpetuate cell locomotion.
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherbinding affinity
dc.subject.otherhuman leukocytes
dc.subject.otherformylpeptide
dc.subject.otherreceptors
dc.subject.otherheterogeneity
dc.titleDirect Visualization of Formylpeptide Receptor Binding on Rounded and Polarized Human Neutrophils: Cellular and Receptor Heterogeneity
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMicrobiology and Immunology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartments of Pathology and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor (W.A.M.)
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Anatomy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago (R.J.W.)
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141552/1/jlb0377.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jlb.41.5.377
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Leukocyte Biology
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.