View Item 

Show simple item record

The Influence of the Buccoâ Palatal Distance on Sinus Augmentation Outcomes
dc.contributor.authorAvila, Gustavo
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.contributor.authorGalindo‐moreno, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorMisch, Carl E.
dc.contributor.authorBagramian, Robert A.
dc.contributor.authorRudek, Ivan
dc.contributor.authorBenavides, Erika
dc.contributor.authorMoreno‐riestra, Ildefonso
dc.contributor.authorBraun, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorNeiva, Rodrigo
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:37:40Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:37:40Z
dc.date.issued2010-07
dc.identifier.citationAvila, Gustavo; Wang, Hom‐lay ; Galindo‐moreno, Pablo ; Misch, Carl E.; Bagramian, Robert A.; Rudek, Ivan; Benavides, Erika; Moreno‐riestra, Ildefonso ; Braun, Thomas; Neiva, Rodrigo (2010). "The Influence of the Buccoâ Palatal Distance on Sinus Augmentation Outcomes." Journal of Periodontology 81(7): 1041-1050.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141630
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherBone transplantation
dc.subject.othermodels, anatomic
dc.subject.othermaxillary sinus
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.titleThe Influence of the Buccoâ Palatal Distance on Sinus Augmentation Outcomes
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School ofPublic Health, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University ofMichigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPrivate practice, Beverly Hills, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University ofGranada School of Dentistry, Granada, Spain.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141630/1/jper1041.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2010.090686
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGapski R, Neiva R, Oh TJ, Wang HL. Histologic analyses of human mineralized bonegrafting material in sinus elevation procedures: A case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 59 â 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Earlyfailures in 4,641 consecutively placed BrÃ¥nemarkdental implants: A study from stage 1 surgery to the connection ofcompleted prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 142 â 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 377 â 396.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFiorellini JP, Nevins ML. Localized ridge augmentation/preservation. Asystematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 321 â 327.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTonetti MS, Hämmerle CH; European Workshop on Periodontology Group C. Advances in bone augmentation to enable dentalimplant placement: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshopon Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 168 â 172.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyne PJ, James RA. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor withautogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg 1980; 38: 613 â 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSummers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: theosteotome technique. Compendium 1994; 15: 152, 154â 156, 158 passim; quiz 162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosci F, Luccioli M. A new sinus lift technique in conjunction withplacement of 265 implants: A 6â year retrospective study. Implant Dent 2000; 9: 363 â 368.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVercellotti T, De Paoli S, Nevins M. The piezoelectric bony window osteotomy and sinusmembrane elevation: Introduction of a new technique forsimplification of the sinus augmentation procedure. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001; 21: 561 â 567.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindoâ Moreno P, Avila G, Fernándezâ Barbero JE, et al. Evaluation of sinus floor elevation using acomposite bone graft mixture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 376 â 382.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFenner M, Vairaktaris E, Stockmann P, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, Nkenke E. Influence of residual alveolar bone height onimplant stability in the maxilla: An experimental animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 751 â 755.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFenner M, Vairaktaris E, Fischer K, Schlegel KA, Neukam FW, Nkenke E. Influence of residual alveolar bone height onosseointegration of implants in the maxilla: A pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 555 â 559.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRios HF, Avila G, Galindoâ Moreno P, Wang HL. The influence of remaining alveolar bone uponlateral window sinus augmentation implant survival. Implant Dent 2009; 18: 402 â 412.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArtzi Z, Kozlovsky A, Nemcovsky CE, Weinreb M. The amount of newly formed bone in sinus graftingprocedures depends on tissue depth as well as the type andresidual amount of the grafted material. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 193 â 199.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWatzek G, Fürst G, Gruber R. Biologic basis of sinus grafting. In: Jensen OT, ed. The Sinus Bone Graft. Hanover Park, IL: Quintessence Books; 2006: 13 â 26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceO’Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol 1972; 43: 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevin L, Herzberg R, Dolev E, Schwartzâ Arad D. Smoking and complications of onlay bone grafts andsinus lift operations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 369 â 373.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZiccardi VB, Smith JA, Braun TW. Osteoma of the maxillary antrum. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80: 378 â 379.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBowers GM, Schallhorn RG, Mellonig JT. Histologic evaluation of new attachment in humanintrabony defects. A literature review. J Periodontol 1982; 53: 509 â 514.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandi L, Pretel RW Jr., Hakimi NM, Setayesh R. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using a combinationof DFDBA and bovineâ derived porous hydroxyapatite: A preliminaryhistologic and histomorphometric report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20: 574 â 583.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKolerman R, Tal H, Moses O. Histomorphometric analysis of newly formed boneafter maxillary sinus floor augmentation using ground corticalbone allograft and internal collagen membrane. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 2104 â 2111.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum SJ, Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, et al. The use of a mineralized allograft for sinusaugmentation: An interim histological case report from aprospective clinical study. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005; 26: 259 â 260, 262â 264, 266â 268; quiz 270â 271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanisch O, Lozada JL, Holmes RE, Calhoun CJ, Kan JY, Spiekermann H. Maxillary sinus augmentation prior to placement ofendosseous implants: A histomorphometric analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 329 â 336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGapski R, Misch C, Stapleton D, et al. Histological, histomorphometric, and radiographicevaluation of a sinus augmentation with a new bone allograft: Aclinical case report. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 430 â 438.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCammack GV 2nd, Nevins M, Clem DS 3rd, Hatch JP, Mellonig JT. Histologic evaluation of mineralized anddemineralized freezeâ dried bone allograft for ridge and sinusaugmentations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 231 â 237.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace SS, Froum SJ. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on thesurvival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 328 â 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum SJ, Tarnow DP, Wallace SS, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Sinusfloor elevation using anorganic bovine bone matrix (OsteoGraf/N)with and without autogenous bone: A clinical, histologic,radiographic, and histomorphometric analysisâ Part2 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998; 18: 528 â 543.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTawil G, Mawla M. Sinus floor elevation using a bovine bone mineral(Bioâ Oss) with or without the concomitant use of a bilayeredcollagen barrier (Bioâ Gide): A clinical report of immediate anddelayed implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 713 â 721.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTarnow DP, Wallace SS, Froum SJ, Rohrer MD, Cho SC. Histologic and clinical comparison of bilateralsinus floor elevations with and without barrier membrane placementin 12 patients: Part 3 of an ongoing prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20: 117 â 125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmitz JP, Hollinger JO. The critical size defect as an experimental modelfor craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986; 299 â 308.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChoi KS, Kan JY, Boyne PJ, Goodacre CJ, Lozada JL, Rungcharassaeng K. The effects of resorbable membrane on humanmaxillary sinus graft: A pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 73 â 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 391 â 401.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changesfollowing singleâ tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic12â month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313 â 323.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSharan A, Madjar D. Maxillary sinus pneumatization followingextractions: A radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 48 â 56.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE. Divisions of available bone in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol 1990; 7: 9 â 17.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper1041.pdf
Size:
1.436MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.