View Item 

Show simple item record

Digitization workflows for flat sheets and packets of plants, algae, and fungi
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Gil
dc.contributor.authorSweeney, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorWallace, Lisa E.
dc.contributor.authorRabeler, Richard K.
dc.contributor.authorAllard, Dorothy
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Herrick
dc.contributor.authorCarter, J. Richard
dc.contributor.authorDenslow, Michael W.
dc.contributor.authorEllwood, Elizabeth R.
dc.contributor.authorGermain‐aubrey, Charlotte C.
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Ed
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Emily
dc.contributor.authorGoertzen, Leslie R.
dc.contributor.authorLegler, Ben
dc.contributor.authorMarchant, D. Blaine
dc.contributor.authorMarsico, Travis D.
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Ashley B.
dc.contributor.authorMurrell, Zack
dc.contributor.authorNazaire, Mare
dc.contributor.authorNeefus, Chris
dc.contributor.authorOberreiter, Shanna
dc.contributor.authorPaul, Deborah
dc.contributor.authorRuhfel, Brad R.
dc.contributor.authorSasek, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Joey
dc.contributor.authorSoltis, Pamela S.
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Kimberly
dc.contributor.authorWeeks, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMast, Austin R.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:39:08Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:39:08Z
dc.date.issued2015-09
dc.identifier.citationNelson, Gil; Sweeney, Patrick; Wallace, Lisa E.; Rabeler, Richard K.; Allard, Dorothy; Brown, Herrick; Carter, J. Richard; Denslow, Michael W.; Ellwood, Elizabeth R.; Germain‐aubrey, Charlotte C. ; Gilbert, Ed; Gillespie, Emily; Goertzen, Leslie R.; Legler, Ben; Marchant, D. Blaine; Marsico, Travis D.; Morris, Ashley B.; Murrell, Zack; Nazaire, Mare; Neefus, Chris; Oberreiter, Shanna; Paul, Deborah; Ruhfel, Brad R.; Sasek, Thomas; Shaw, Joey; Soltis, Pamela S.; Watson, Kimberly; Weeks, Andrea; Mast, Austin R. (2015). "Digitization workflows for flat sheets and packets of plants, algae, and fungi." Applications in Plant Sciences 3(9): n/a-n/a.
dc.identifier.issn2168-0450
dc.identifier.issn2168-0450
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141708
dc.publisherBotanical Society of America
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherherbarium
dc.subject.othercitizen science
dc.subject.otherdigital imaging
dc.subject.otherdigitization
dc.subject.otherspecimen database
dc.subject.otherworkflow
dc.titleDigitization workflows for flat sheets and packets of plants, algae, and fungi
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBotany
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumUniversity of Michigan Herbariumâ EEB, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherIntegrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio), Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306â 2100 USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBiology Department, Valdosta State University, Valdosta, Georgia, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherFlorida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherSchool of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBurke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherPeabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherRancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, New Hampshire, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biological Sciences, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, Kentucky, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology, University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherBiological and Environmental Sciences, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, Tennessee, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWilliam and Lynda Steere Herbarium, The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Biology and the Ted R. Bradley Herbarium, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141708/1/aps31500065.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.3732/apps.1500065
dc.identifier.sourceApplications in Plant Sciences
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlagoderov, V., I. J. Kitching, L. Livermore, T. J. Simonsen, and V. S. Smith. 2012. No specimen left behind: Industrial scale digitization of natural history collections. ZooKeys 209: 133 â 146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlagoderov, V., I. Kitching, T. Simonsen, and V. S. Smith. 2010. Report on trial of SatScan tray scanner system by SmartDrive Ltd. [online]. Website http://precedings.nature.com/documents/4486/version/1 [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVollmar, A., J. A. Macklin, and L. S. Ford. 2010. Natural history specimen digitization: Challenges and concerns. Biodiversity Informatics 7: 93 â 112.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceU.S. Virtual Herbarium. 2015. U.S. Virtual Herbarium 2014 survey data [online]. Website http://usvhproject.org/#/progress [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTulig, M., N. Tarnowsky, M. Bevans, A. Kirchgessner, and B. M. Thiers. 2012. Increasing the efficiency of digitization workflows for herbarium specimens. ZooKeys 209: 103 â 113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTulig, M. 2014. Data capture from images [online]. Website http://biodiversityâ informaticsâ training.org/wpâ content/uploads/2014/03/D3_P3_MT_OCR.pdf [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThiers, B. 2015. Index Herbariorum [online]. Website http://sciweb.nybg.org/science2/IndexHerbariorum.asp [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThiele, K. 2014. Australia’s virtual herbarium: 5 million records and counting [online]. Website http://avh.chah.org.au/index.php/2014/08/12/pressâ release/ [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTegelberg, R., T. Mononen, and H. Saarenmaa. 2014. Highâ performance digitization of natural history collections: Automated imaging lines for herbarium and insect specimens. Taxon 63: 1307 â 1313.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTegelberg, R., J. Haapala, T. Mononen, M. Pajari, and H. Saarenmaa. 2012. The development of a digitising service centre for natural history collections. ZooKeys 209: 75 â 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSoltis, P. S., X. Liu, D. B. Marchant, C. J. Visger, and D. S. Soltis. 2014. Polyploidy and novelty: Gottlieb’s legacy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369: 20130351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSnow, N. 2005. Successfully curating smaller herbarium and natural history collections in academic settings. BioScience 55: 771 â 779.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShanmughavel, P. 2007. An overview on biodiversity information in databases. Bioinformation 1: 367 â 369.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScoble, M. J., and T. Bourgoin. 2010. Natural history collections digitization: Rationale and value. Biodiversity Informatics 7: 77 â 80.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchuh, R. 2012. Integrating specimen databases and re visionary systematics. ZooKeys 209: 255 â 267.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmidt, S., M. Balke, and S. Lafogler. 2012. DScanâ A highâ performance digital scanning system for entomological collections. ZooKeys 209: 183 â 191.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRabeler, R. 2015. Skeletal records accompanying images: Efficiency vs later utility. Presentation made to the annual meeting of the Society for the Preservation of Natural History Collections. Website https://www.idigbio.org/content/skeletalâ recordsâ accompanyingâ imagesâ efficiencyâ vsâ laterâ utility [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferencePignal, M., and H. Michiels. 2011. Switching to the fast track: Rapid digitization of the world’s largest herbarium [online]. Website http://collections.mnhn.fr/wiki/attach/Visit_October2012/Parisâ Herbariumâ Digitization_2012â 07â 12.pdf [accessed 27 May 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNelson, G., D. Paul, G. Riccardi, and A. R. Mast. 2012. Five task clusters that enable efficient and effective digitization of biological collections. ZooKeys 209: 19 â 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeefus, C. 2014. Digitization workflow for a small herbarium [online]. Website https://www.idigbio.org/content/digitizationâ workflowâ smallâ herbarium [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMantle, B. L., J. La Salle, and N. Fisher. 2012. Wholeâ drawer imaging for digital management and curation of a large entomological collection. ZooKeys 209: 147 â 163.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoarie, S. R., B. E. Carter, K. Hayhoe, S. McMahon, R. Moe, C. A. Knight, and D. D. Ackerly. 2008. Climate change and the future of California’s endemic flora. PLoS One 3: e2502.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJohnson, K. G., S. J. Brooks, P. B. Fenbert, A. G. Glover, K. E. James, A. M. Lister, E. Michel, et al. 2011. Climate change and biosphere response: Unlocking the collections vault. BioScience 61: 147 â 153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceiDigBio. 2014. iDigBio imaging equipment recommendations. Version 2.0 [online]. Website https://www.idigbio.org/wiki/images/8/86/IDigBioImagingGeneralEquipmentRecommendations1_0.pdf [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceiDigBio. 2012. Workflow modules and task lists [online]. Website https://www.idigbio.org/content/workflowâ modulesâ andâ taskâ lists [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBeach, J., S. Blum, M. Donoghue, L. Ford, R. Guralnick, M. Mares, B. Thiers, et al. 2010. A strategic plan for establishing a network integrated biocollections alliance [online]. Website http://digbiocol.wordpress.com/brochure [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarkworth, M. E., and Z. E. Murrell. 2012. The US Virtual Herbarium: Working with individual herbaria to build a national resource. ZooKeys 209: 55 â 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill, A., R. Guralnick, A. Smith, A. Saltans, R. Gillespie, M. Denslow, J. Gross, et al. 2012. The notes from nature tool for unlocking biodiversity records from museum records through citizen science. ZooKeys 209: 219 â 233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHauser, C., A. Steiner, J. Holstein, and M. Scoble. 2005. Digital imaging of biological type specimens: A manual of best practice. European Network for Biodiversity Information, Stuttgart, Germany. Website http://www.gbif.org/resource/80576 [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHaston, E., R. Cubby, M. Pullan, H. Atkins, and D. J. Harris. 2012. Developing integrated workflows for the digitisation of herbarium specimens using a modular and scalable approach. ZooKeys 209: 93 â 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGries, C., E. E. Gilbert, and N. M. Franz. 2014. Symbiotaâ A virtual platform for creating voucherâ based biodiversity information communities. Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGamble, B., and J. Whitacre. 2014. Genetic sampling: From field to freezer and sharing the data [online]. Website https://emu.kesoftware.com/newsâ andâ events/conferences/2146â globalâ emuâ userâ conferenceâ 15â 17â octoberâ 2014 [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeeley, K. J., and M. R. Silman. 2011. Keep collecting: Accurate species distribution modeling requires more collections than previously thought. Diversity & Distributions 17: 1132 â 1140.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEllwood, E. R., B. A. Dunckel, P. Flemons, R. Guralnick, G. Nelson, G. Newman, S. Newman, et al. 2015. Accelerating the digitization of biodiversity research specimens through online public participation. BioScience 65: 383 â 396.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDietrich, C., J. Hart, D. Raila, U. Ravaioli, N. Sobh, O. Sobh, and C. Taylor. 2012. InvertNet: A new paradigm for digital access to invertebrate collections. ZooKeys 209: 165 â 181.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDepartment of the Interior. 2009. Interior collections management system, Chapter 4: Associated Modules [online]. Website http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/ICMSmanual/14â Chapter%204â Associated%20Modules.pdf [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapman, A. D., and J. Wieczorek. 2006. Guide to best practices for geoâ referencing. Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen, Denmark. Website http://www.gbif.org/resource/80536 [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapman, A. D., and O. Grafton. 2008. Guide to best practices for generalising sensitive species occurrence data. Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen, Denmark. Website http://www.gbif.org/resource/80512 [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChapman, A. D. 2005. Principles and methods of data cleaningâ Primary species and speciesâ occurrence data, version 1.0. Report for the Global Biodiversity Information Facility, Copenhagen, Denmark. Website http://www.gbif.org/resource/80528 [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasasâ Marce, M., E. Revilla, M. Fernandes, A. Rodríguez, M. Delibes, and J. A. Godoy. 2012. The value of hidden scientific resources: Preserved animal specimens from private collections and small museums. BioScience 62: 1077 â 1082.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceButts, S. 2013. YPMâ IP Workflow with Voice Recognition Imaging [online]. Website https://www.idigbio.org/content/ypmâ ipâ workflowâ voiceâ recognitionâ imaging [accessed 27 April 2015].
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBuffington, M. L., R. A. Burks, and L. McNeil. 2005. Advanced techniques for imaging parasitic Hymenoptera (Insecta). American Entomologist 51: 50 â 56.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
aps31500065.pdf
Size:
779.3KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.