View Item 

Show simple item record

Alveolar Bone Architecture: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis

dc.contributor.authorMonje, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun‐liang
dc.contributor.authorGalindo‐moreno, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorElnayef, Basel
dc.contributor.authorSuarez‐lopez Del Amo, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorWang, Feng
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:39:53Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:39:53Z
dc.date.issued2015-11
dc.identifier.citationMonje, Alberto; Chan, Hsun‐liang ; Galindo‐moreno, Pablo ; Elnayef, Basel; Suarez‐lopez Del Amo, Fernando ; Wang, Feng; Wang, Hom‐lay (2015). "Alveolar Bone Architecture: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis." Journal of Periodontology 86(11): 1231-1248.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141748
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.subject.otherendosseous
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.subject.otherevidenceâ based dentistry
dc.subject.otherdental implantation
dc.subject.otherbone and bones
dc.subject.otherAlveolar bone grafting
dc.titleAlveolar Bone Architecture: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral Implantology, Ninth Peopleâ s Hospital Affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implantology, International University of Catalonia, Catalonia, Spain.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherOral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141748/1/jper1231-sup-0001.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141748/2/jper1231.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141748/3/jper1231-sup-0004.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2015.150263
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Velzen FJ, Ofec R, Schulten EA, Ten Bruggenkate CM. 10â year survival rate and the incidence of periâ implant disease of 374 titanium dental implants with a SLA surface: A prospective cohort study in 177 fully and partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 1121 â 1128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlm CW, Kneissel M, Hahn M, Solar P, Matejka M, Donath K. Characteristics of the cancellous bone of edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 125 â 130.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Dessel N, den Boeft M, van der Wouden JC, et al. Nonâ pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders and medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 11: CD011142.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106: 721 â 764.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFriberg B, Sennerby L, Roos J, Lekholm U. Identification of bone quality in conjunction with insertion of titanium implants. A pilot study in jaw autopsy specimens. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995; 6: 213 â 219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Suarez F, Garaicoa CA, et al. Effect of location on primary stability and healing of dental implants. Implant Dent 2014; 23: 69 â 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJimbo R, Tovar N, Yoo DY, Janal MN, Anchieta RB, Coelho PG. The effect of different surgical drilling procedures on full laserâ etched microgrooves surfaceâ treated implants: An experimental study in sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 1072 â 1077.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHenry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, et al. Osseointegrated implants for singleâ tooth replacement: A prospective 5â year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 450 â 455.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGoiato MC, dos Santos DM, Santiago JF Jr., Moreno A, Pellizzer EP. Longevity of dental implants in type IV bone: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014; 43: 1108 â 1116.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKuchler U, Pfingstner G, Busenlechner D, et al. Osteocyte lacunar density and area in newly formed bone of the augmented sinus. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 285 â 289.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNakashima T, Hayashi M, Fukunaga T, et al. Evidence for osteocyte regulation of bone homeostasis through RANKL expression. Nat Med 2011; 17: 1231 â 1234.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes JM, Petit MA. Biological underpinnings of Frostâ s mechanostat thresholds: The important role of osteocytes. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2010; 10: 128 â 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHernandez CJ, Majeska RJ, Schaffler MB. Osteocyte density in woven bone. Bone 2004; 35: 1095 â 1099.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGerstenfeld LC, Cullinane DM, Barnes GL, Graves DT, Einhorn TA. Fracture healing as a postâ natal developmental process: Molecular, spatial, and temporal aspects of its regulation. J Cell Biochem 2003; 88: 873 â 884.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEinhorn TA. Enhancement of fractureâ healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 940 â 956.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrandi ML, Collinâ Osdoby P. Vascular biology and the skeleton. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 183 â 192.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindoâ Moreno P, Padialâ Molina M, Fernándezâ Barbero JE, Mesa F, Rodríguezâ Martínez D, Oâ Valle F. Optimal microvessel density from composite graft of autogenous maxillary cortical bone and anorganic bovine bone in sinus augmentation: Influence of clinical variables. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 221 â 227.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch C. Classifications and treatment options of the completely edentulous arch in implant dentistry. Dent Today 1990; 9:26, 28â 30.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLekholm U. Surgical considerations and possible shortcomings of host sites. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 43 â 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTruhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Morris HF, Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55 ( 12, Suppl. 5 ) 38 â 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, BrÃ¥nemark PI, Jemt T. Longâ term followâ up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347 â 359.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4: 211 â 217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlm CW, Solar P, Ulm MR, Matejka M. Sexâ related changes in the bone mineral content of atrophic mandibles. Calcif Tissue Int 1994; 54: 203 â 207.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGonzálezâ García R, Monje F. The reliability of coneâ beam computed tomography to assess bone density at dental implant recipient sites: A histomorphometric analysis by microâ CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 871 â 879.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Monje F, Gonzálezâ García R, Galindoâ Moreno P, Rodriguezâ Salvanes F, Wang HL. Comparison between microcomputed tomography and coneâ beam computed tomography radiologic bone to assess atrophic posterior maxilla density and microarchitecture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014; 25: 723 â 728.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBenavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, et al. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 78 â 86.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFonseca AA, Cherubini K, Veeck EB, Ladeira RS, Carapeto LP. Effect of 10% formalin on radiographic optical density of bone specimens. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 137 â 141.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurrey JD, Brear K, Zioupos P, Reilly GC. Effect of formaldehyde fixation on some mechanical properties of bovine bone. Biomaterials 1995; 16: 1267 â 1271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFrost HM. Wolffâ s Law and boneâ s structural adaptations to mechanical usage: An overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994; 64: 175 â 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLefebvre C, Glanville J, Wieland LS, Coles B, Weightman AL. Methodological developments in searching for studies for systematic reviews: Past, present and future? Syst Rev 2013; 2: 78.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarada S, Rodan GA. Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass. Nature 2003; 423: 349 â 355.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following singleâ tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12â month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313 â 323.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePietrokovski J, Massler M. Residual ridge remodeling after tooth extraction in monkeys. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 26: 119 â 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePietrokovski J, Massler M. Ridge remodeling after tooth extraction in rats. J Dent Res 1967; 46: 222 â 231.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlm C, Tepper G, Blahout R, Rauschâ Fan X, Hienz S, Matejka M. Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 594 â 600.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmler MH, Johnson PL, Salman I. Histological and histochemical investigation of human alveolar socket healing in undisturbed extraction wounds. J Am Dent Assoc 1960; 61: 32 â 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarlsson GE. Changes in the jaws and facial profile after extractions and prosthetic treatment. Trans R Sch Dent Stockh Umea 1967; 12: 1 â 29.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKassolis JD, Reynolds MA. Evaluation of the adjunctive benefits of plateletâ rich plasma in subantral sinus augmentation. J Craniofac Surg 2005; 16: 280 â 287.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChan HL, Lin GH, Fu JH, Wang HL. Alterations in bone quality after socket preservation with grafting materials: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013; 28: 710 â 720.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHernandezâ Cortes P, Monje A, Galindoâ Moreno P, et al. An ex vivo model in human femoral heads for histopathological study and resonance frequency analysis of dental implant primary stability. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 535929.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindhe J, Cecchinato D, Bressan EA, Toia M, Araújo MG, Liljenberg B. The alveolar process of the edentulous maxilla in periodontitis and nonâ periodontitis subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 5 â 11.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE. Bone classification, training keys to implant success. Dent Today 1989; 8: 39 â 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: Clinicalâ histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 1 â 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Gonzálezâ García R, Monje F, et al. Microarchitectural pattern of pristine maxillary bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015; 30: 125 â 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlok Y, Gravesteijn FA, van Ruijven LJ, Koolstra JH. Microâ architecture and mineralization of the human alveolar bone obtained with microCT. Arch Oral Biol 2013; 58: 621 â 627.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim YJ, Henkin J. Microâ computed tomography assessment of human alveolar bone: Bone density and threeâ dimensional microâ architecture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17: 307 â 313.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindhe J, Bressan E, Cecchinato D, Corrá E, Toia M, Liljenberg B. Bone tissue in different parts of the edentulous maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 372 â 377.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, BrÃ¥nemark PI. A 15â year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10: 387 â 416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrÃ¥nemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10â year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977; 16: 1 â 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: Clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 26 â 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCha JY, Pereira MD, Smith AA, et al. Multiscale analyses of the boneâ implant interface. J Dent Res 2015; 94: 482 â 490.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies JE. Understanding periâ implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 932 â 949.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies JE. Mechanisms of endosseous integration. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 391 â 401.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParfitt AM. Bone histomorphometry: Proposed system for standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Calcif Tissue Int 1988; 42: 284 â 286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHahn M, Vogel M, Pompesiusâ Kempa M, Delling G. Trabecular bone pattern factor â A new parameter for simple quantification of bone microarchitecture. Bone 1992; 13: 327 â 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHildebrand T, Rüegsegger P. Quantification of bone microarchitecture with the structure model index. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 1997; 1: 15 â 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurrey JD. The many adaptations of bone. J Biomech 2003; 36: 1487 â 1495.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOdgaard A, Gundersen HJ. Quantification of connectivity in cancellous bone, with special emphasis on 3â D reconstructions. Bone 1993; 14: 173 â 182.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCompston JE. Bone density: BMC, BMD, or corrected BMD? Bone 1995; 16: 5 â 7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1013 â 1020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaâ analyses: The PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009; 339: b2535.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastleâ Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaâ analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603 â 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAksoy U, Eratalay K, Tözüm TF. The possible association among bone density values, resonance frequency measurements, tactile sense, and histomorphometric evaluations of dental implant osteotomy sites: A preliminary study. Implant Dent 2009; 18: 316 â 325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertl K, Subotic M, Heimel P, Schwarze UY, Tangl S, Ulm C. Morphometric characteristics of cortical and trabecular bone in atrophic edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 780 â 787.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBertl K, Heimel P, Reich KM, Schwarze UY, Ulm C. A histomorphometric analysis of the nature of the mandibular canal in the anterior molar region. Clin Oral Investig 2014; 18: 41 â 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFanuscu MI, Chang TL. Threeâ dimensional morphometric analysis of human cadaver bone: Microstructural data from maxilla and mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 213 â 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindoâ Moreno P, Morenoâ Riestra I, Avila G, et al. Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 122 â 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferencede Oliveira RC, Leles CR, Lindh C, Ribeiroâ Rotta RF. Bone tissue microarchitectural characteristics at dental implant sites. Part 1: Identification of clinicalâ related parameters. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 981 â 986.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGonzálezâ García R, Monje F. Is microâ computed tomography reliable to determine the microstructure of the maxillary alveolar bone? Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 730 â 737.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMakary C, Rebaudi A, Sammartino G, Naaman N. Implant primary stability determined by resonance frequency analysis: Correlation with insertion torque, histologic bone volume, and torsional stability at 6 weeks. Implant Dent 2012; 21: 474 â 480.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Monje F, Gonzálezâ García R, et al. Influence of atrophic posterior maxilla ridge height on bone density and microarchitecture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17: 111 â 119.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoon HS, Won YY, Kim KD, et al. The threeâ dimensional microstructure of the trabecular bone in the mandible. Surg Radiol Anat 2004; 26: 466 â 473.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParsa A, Ibrahim N, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D. Bone quality evaluation at dental implant site using multislice CT, microâ CT, and cone beam CT. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: e1 â e7.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilthampitag P, Klineberg I, Austin B, Jones AS. Bone microarchitecture at oral implant sites in ectodermal dysplasia (ED): A comparison between males and females. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1275 â 1282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStoppie N, Pattijn V, Van Cleynenbreugel T, Wevers M, Vander Sloten J, Ignace N. Structural and radiological parameters for the characterization of jawbone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 124 â 133.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlm CW, Solar P, Blahout R, Matejka M, Watzek G, Gruber H. Location of the mandibular canal within the atrophic mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 31: 370 â 375.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUlm C, Kneissel M, Schedle A, et al. Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 459 â 467.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper1231-sup-0001.pdf
Size:
53.51KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper1231.pdf
Size:
1.778MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper1231-sup-0004.pdf
Size:
11.79KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.