View Item 

Show simple item record

The Influence of Implant Diameter on Its Survival: A Metaâ Analysis Based on Prospective Clinical Trials
dc.contributor.authorOrtega‐oller, Inmaculada
dc.contributor.authorSuárez, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGalindo‐moreno, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorTorrecillas‐martínez, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMonje, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorCatena, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:40:37Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:40:37Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.identifier.citationOrtega‐oller, Inmaculada ; Suárez, Fernando ; Galindo‐moreno, Pablo ; Torrecillas‐martínez, Laura ; Monje, Alberto; Catena, Andrés ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2014). "The Influence of Implant Diameter on Its Survival: A Metaâ Analysis Based on Prospective Clinical Trials." Journal of Periodontology 85(4): 569-580.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141793
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherAlveolar process
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.subject.othersingleâ tooth
dc.subject.otherdental prosthesis
dc.subject.otherimplantâ supported
dc.subject.otherdental implantation
dc.titleThe Influence of Implant Diameter on Its Survival: A Metaâ Analysis Based on Prospective Clinical Trials
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumGraduate Periodontics, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141793/1/jper0569.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2013.130043
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolizzi G, Fabbro S, Furri M, Herrmann I, Squarzoni S. Clinical application of narrow BrÃ¥nemark System implants for singleâ tooth restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 496 â 503.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson T, Gottlow J, Meirelles L, Ostman PO, Rocci A, Sennerby L. Survival of NobelDirect implants: An analysis of 550 consecutively placed implants at 18 different clinical centers. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9: 65 â 70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArisan V, BölükbaÅ i N, Ersanli S, Ozdemir T. Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5â 10 years: A clinical and radiographic retrospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 296 â 307.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCordaro L, Torsello F, Mirisola Di Torresanto V, Rossini C. Retrospective evaluation of mandibular incisor replacement with narrow neck implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 730 â 735.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDegidi M, Piattelli A, Carinci F. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants: A retrospective study of 510 implants. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 49 â 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFranco M, Viscioni A, Rigo L, et al. Clinical outcome of narrow diameter implants inserted into allografts. J Appl Oral Sci 2009; 17: 301 â 306.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGeckili O, Mumcu E, Bilhan H. Radiographic evaluation of narrow diameter implants after 5 years of clinical function: A retrospective study [published online ahead of print February 5, 2011]. J Oral Implantol 2013; Special Issue 39: 273 â 279.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazzara R, Siddiqui AA, Binon P, et al. Retrospective multicenter analysis of 3i endosseous dental implants placed over a fiveâ year period. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 73 â 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee JS, Kim HM, Kim CS, Choi SH, Chai JK, Jung UW. Longâ term retrospective study of narrow implants for fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 847 â 852.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOlate S, Lyrio MC, de Moraes M, Mazzonetto R, Moreira RW. Influence of diameter and length of implant on early dental implant failure. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 414 â 419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSohn DS, Bae MS, Heo JU, Park JS, Yea SH, Romanos GE. Retrospective multicenter analysis of immediate provisionalization using oneâ piece narrowâ diameter (3.0â mm) implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 163 â 168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpiekermann H, Jansen VK, Richter EJ. A 10â year followâ up study of IMZ and TPS implants in the edentulous mandible using barâ retained overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 231 â 243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 22 â 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaló P, de Araújo Nobre M. Implants (3.3 mm diameter) for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: A retrospective clinical study with up to 11 years of followâ up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13: 95 â 103.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuang JS, Zhao JJ, Liu Q, Liu TT. Clinical research of immediate restoration implant with miniâ implants in edentulous space (in Chinese). Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi 2010; 28: 412 â 416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSethi A, Harding S, Sochor P. Initial results of the Osteo Ti implant system in general dental practice. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1996; 4: 21 â 28.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMericskeâ Stern R, Grütter L, Rösch R, Mericske E. Clinical evaluation and prosthetic complications of single tooth replacements by nonâ submerged implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 309 â 318.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBulard RA, Vance JB. Multiâ clinic evaluation using miniâ dental implants for longâ term denture stabilization: A preliminary biometric evaluation. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005; 26: 892 â 897.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 272 â 281.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceComfort MB, Chu FC, Chai J, Wat PY, Chow TW. A 5â year prospective study on small diameter screwâ shaped oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 2005; 32: 341 â 345.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJofré J, Hamada T, Nishimura M, Klattenhoff C. The effect of maximum bite force on marginal bone loss of miniâ implants supporting a mandibular overdenture: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 243 â 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJofre J, Cendoya P, Munoz P. Effect of splinting miniâ implants on marginal bone loss: A biomechanical model and clinical randomized study with mandibular overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 1137 â 1144.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran DL, Nummikoski PV, Schoolfield JD, Jones AA, Oates TW. A prospective multicenter 5â year radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels over time in 596 dental implants placed in 192 patients. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 725 â 733.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum SJ, Cho SC, Cho YS, Elian N, Tarnow D. Narrowâ diameter implants: A restorative option for limited interdental space. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 449 â 455.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampelo LD, Camara JR. Flapless implant surgery: A 10â year clinical retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 271 â 276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGibney JW. Minimally invasive implant surgery. J Oral Implantol 2001; 27: 73 â 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenouard F, Nisand D. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17 (Suppl. 2): 35 â 51.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAllum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: A comparative laboratory study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 553 â 559.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavies JE. Understanding periâ implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003; 67: 932 â 949.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, BrÃ¥nemark PI, Jemt T. Longâ term followâ up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 347 â 359.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAdell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, BrÃ¥nemark PI. A 15â year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10: 387 â 416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZinsli B, Sägesser T, Mericske E, Mericskeâ Stern R. Clinical evaluation of smallâ diameter ITI implants: A prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 92 â 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following singleâ tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12â month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313 â 323.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraújo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212 â 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDavarpanah M, Martinez H, Tecucianu JF, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Smallâ diameter implants: Indications and contraindications. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 186 â 194.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindoâ Moreno P, Nilsson P, King P, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of early loaded narrow diameter implants â 1â year followâ up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 609 â 616.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceQuek CE, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue performance of a singleâ tooth implant abutment system: Effect of diameter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 929 â 936.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaadoun AP, Le Gall MG. An 8â year compilation of clinical results obtained with Steriâ Oss endosseous implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996;17:669â 674, 676 passim; quiz 688.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDegidi M, Nardi D, Piattelli A. Immediate versus oneâ stage restoration of smallâ diameter implants for a single missing maxillary lateral incisor: A 3â year randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1393 â 1398.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomeo E, Lops D, Amorfini L, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of smallâ diameter (3.3â mm) implants followed for 1â 7 years: A longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 139 â 148.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElsyad MA, Gebreel AA, Fouad MM, Elshoukouki AH. The clinical and radiographic outcome of immediately loaded mini implants supporting a mandibular overdenture. A 3â year prospective study. J Oral Rehabil 2011; 38: 827 â 834.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffitts TM, Collins CP, Collins PC. Mini dental implants: An adjunct for retention, stability, and comfort for the edentulous patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 100: e81 â e84.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZarone F, Sorrentino R, Vaccaro F, Russo S. Prosthetic treatment of maxillary lateral incisor agenesis with osseointegrated implants: A 24â 39â month prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 94 â 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M, Corsi E, Anello T. Titaniumâ zirconium alloy narrowâ diameter implants (Straumann Roxolid®) for the rehabilitation of horizontally deficient edentulous ridges: Prospective study on 18 consecutive patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1136 â 1141.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J. How successful are smallâ diameter implants? A literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 515 â 525.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaâ analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaâ analyses: The PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1006 â 1012.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastleâ Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaâ analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603 â 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Brägger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 667 â 676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirkwood BR, Sterne JA. Essential medical statistics. In: Poisson Regression. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 2003:249â 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirkwood BR, Sterne JA. Essential medical statistics. In: Survival Analysis: Displaying and Comparing Survival Patterns. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science; 2003:272â 286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMorneburg TR, Pröschel PA. Success rates of microimplants in edentulous patients with residual ridge resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 270 â 276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHallman M. A prospective study of treatment of severely resorbed maxillae with narrow nonsubmerged implants: Results after 1 year of loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 731 â 736.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlâ Nawas B, Brägger U, Meijer HJ, et al. A doubleâ blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) of titaniumâ 13zirconium versus titanium grade IV smallâ diameter bone level implants in edentulous mandibles â Results from a 1â year observation period. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: 896 â 904.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndersen E, Saxegaard E, Knutsen BM, Haanaes HR. A prospective clinical study evaluating the safety and effectiveness of narrowâ diameter threaded implants in the anterior region of the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 217 â 224.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVeltri M, Ferrari M, Balleri P. Oneâ year outcome of narrow diameter blasted implants for rehabilitation of maxillas with knifeâ edge resorption. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 1069 â 1073.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOyama K, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Lozada J. Immediate provisionalization of 3.0â mmâ diameter implants replacing single missing maxillary and mandibular incisors: 1â year prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 173 â 180.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceElâ Sheikh AM, Shihabuddin OF, Ghoraba SM. Two versus three narrowâ diameter implants with locator attachments supporting mandibular overdentures: A twoâ year prospective study. Int J Dent 2012; 2012: 285684.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAhn MR, An KM, Choi JH, Sohn DS. Immediate loading with mini dental implants in the fully edentulous mandible. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 367 â 372.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCho SC, Froum S, Tai CH, Cho YS, Elian N, Tarnow DP. Immediate loading of narrowâ diameter implants with overdentures in severely atrophic mandibles. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2007; 19: 167 â 174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMazor Z, Steigmann M, Leshem R, Peleg M. Miniâ implants to reconstruct missing teeth in severe ridge deficiency and small interdental space: A 5â year case series. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 336 â 341.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReddy MS, O’Neal SJ, Haigh S, Aponteâ Wesson R, Geurs NC. Initial clinical efficacy of 3â mm implants immediately placed into function in conditions of limited spacing. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 281 â 288.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, Andía I. Clinical outcome of immediately loaded dental implants bioactivated with plasma rich in growth factors: A 5â year retrospective study. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 1168 â 1176.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnitua E, Errazquin JM, de Pedro J, Barrio P, Begoña L, Orive G. Clinical evaluation of Tiny® 2.5â and 3.0â mm narrowâ diameter implants as definitive implants in different clinical situations: A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Oral Implantology 2010; 3: 315 â 322.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalaji A, Mohamed JB, Kathiresan R. A pilot study of mini implants as a treatment option for prosthetic rehabilitation of ridges with subâ optimal bone volume. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2010; 9: 334 â 338.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShatkin TE, Shatkin S, Oppenheimer BD, Oppenheimer AJ. Mini dental implants for longâ term fixed and removable prosthetics: A retrospective analysis of 2514 implants placed over a fiveâ year period. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007; 28: 92 â 99, quiz 100â 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVigolo P, Givani A. Clinical evaluation of singleâ tooth miniâ implant restorations: A fiveâ year retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 50 â 54.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVigolo P, Givani A, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Clinical evaluation of smallâ diameter implants in singleâ tooth and multipleâ implant restorations: A 7â year retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 703 â 709.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper0569.pdf
Size:
631.5KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.