View Item 

Show simple item record

Outcome Reporting in Randomized Trials for Shoulder Disorders: Literature Review to Inform the Development of a Core Outcome Set
dc.contributor.authorPage, Matthew J.
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Hsiaomin
dc.contributor.authorVerhagen, Arianne P.
dc.contributor.authorGagnier, Joel J.
dc.contributor.authorBuchbinder, Rachelle
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:41:11Z
dc.date.available2019-04-01T15:01:10Zen
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.identifier.citationPage, Matthew J.; Huang, Hsiaomin; Verhagen, Arianne P.; Gagnier, Joel J.; Buchbinder, Rachelle (2018). "Outcome Reporting in Randomized Trials for Shoulder Disorders: Literature Review to Inform the Development of a Core Outcome Set." Arthritis Care & Research 70(2): 252-259.
dc.identifier.issn2151-464X
dc.identifier.issn2151-4658
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141827
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherWorld Health Organization
dc.titleOutcome Reporting in Randomized Trials for Shoulder Disorders: Literature Review to Inform the Development of a Core Outcome Set
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeriatrics
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141827/1/acr23254_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141827/2/acr23254.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/acr.23254
dc.identifier.sourceArthritis Care & Research
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E, et al. Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials 2012; 13: 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchumacher HR Jr, Edwards LN, Perez‐Ruiz F, Becker M, Chen LX, Furst DE, et al. Outcome measures for acute and chronic gout. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 2452 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePage MJ, McKenzie JE, Green SE, Beaton DE, Jain NB, Lenza M, et al. Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 1270 – 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGagnier JJ, Page MJ, Huang H, Verhagen AP, Buchbinder R. Creation of a core outcome set for clinical trials of people with shoulder pain: a study protocol. Trials 2017; 18: 336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWhittle S, Buchbinder R. In the clinic: rotator cuff disease. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162: 1 – 15.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Thomas S, Koes BW. Lack of uniformity in diagnostic labeling of shoulder pain: time for a different approach. Manual Ther 2008; 13: 478 – 83.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) index. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: release 13. College Station (TX): StataCorp; 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceConstant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987; 214: 160 – 4.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRoach KE, Budiman‐Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 1991; 4: 143 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDwan K, Gamble C, Williamson PR, Kirkham JJ, and the Reporting Bias Group. Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias: an updated review. PLoS One 2013; 8: e66844.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKirwan JR, Hewlett SE, Heiberg T, Hughes RA, Carr M, Hehir M, et al. Incorporating the patient perspective into outcome assessment in rheumatoid arthritis: progress at OMERACT 7. J Rheumatol 2005; 32: 2250 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTunis SR, Clarke M, Gorst SL, Gargon E, Blazeby JM, Altman DG, et al. Improving the relevance and consistency of outcomes in comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res 2016; 5: 193 – 205.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRussell RD, Knight JR, Mulligan E, Khazzam MS. Structural integrity after rotator cuff repair does not correlate with patient function and pain: a meta‐analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 265 – 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWylie JD, Suter T, Potter MQ, Granger EK, Tashjian RZ. Mental health has a stronger association with patient‐reported shoulder pain and function than tear size in patients with full‐thickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2016; 98: 251 – 6.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDunn WR, Kuhn JE, Sanders R, An Q, Baumgarten KM, Bishop JY, et al. Symptoms of pain do not correlate with rotator cuff tear severity: a cross‐sectional study of 393 patients with asymptomatic atraumatic full‐thickness rotator cuff tear. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014; 96: 793 – 800.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCurry EJ, Matzkin EE, Dong Y, Higgins LD, Katz JN, Jain NB. Structural characteristics are not associated with pain and function in rotator cuff tears: the ROW Cohort Study. Orthop J Sports Med 2015; 3:2325967115584596.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlack N. Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. BMJ 2013; 346: f167.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKeeley T, Williamson P, Callery P, Jones LL, Mathers J, Jones J, et al. The use of qualitative methods to inform Delphi surveys in core outcome set development. Trials 2016; 17: 230.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, Rose P, Randall T, Fitzpatrick R, et al. Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2006; 45: 215 – 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOstor AJ, Richards CA, Prevost AT, Speed CA, Hazleman BL. Diagnosis and relation to general health of shoulder disorders presenting to primary care. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2005; 44: 800 – 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLuime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, Burdof A, Verhagen AP, Miedema HS, et al. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population: a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 2004; 33: 73 – 81.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreen S, Buchbinder R, Glazier R, Forbes A. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder: selection criteria, outcome assessment, and efficacy. BMJ 1998; 316: 354 – 60.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTekavec E, Jöud E, Rittner R, Mikoczy Z, Nordander C, Petersson IF, et al. Population‐based consultation patterns in patients with shoulder pain diagnoses. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 238.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan der Heijden GJ. Shoulder disorders: a state‐of‐the‐art review. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 1999; 13: 287 – 309.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLargacha M, Parsons IM IV, Campbell B, Titelman RM, Smith KL, Matsen F III. Deficits in shoulder function and general health associated with sixteen common shoulder diagnoses: a study of 2,674 patients. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2006; 15: 30 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMather RC III, Koenig L, Acevedo D, Dall TM, Gallo P, Romeo A, et al. The societal and economic value of rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95: 1993 – 2000.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVirta L, Joranger P, Brox J, Eriksson R. Costs of shoulder pain and resource use in primary health care: a cost‐of‐illness study in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2012; 13: 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClarke M. Standardising outcomes for clinical trials and systematic reviews. Trials 2007; 8: 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTugwell P, Boers M, Brooks P, Simon L, Strand V, Idzerda L. OMERACT: an international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials 2007; 8: 38.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWilliamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Gargon E. Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes [editorial]. J Health Serv Res Policy 2012; 17: 1 – 2.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, Beaton D, Gossec L, d’Agostino MA, et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 745 – 53.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGorst SL, Gargon E, Clarke M, Blazeby JM, Altman DG, Williamson PR. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: an updated review and user survey. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0146444.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoers M, Tugwell P, Felson DT, van Riel PL, Kirwan JR, Edmonds JP, et al. World Health Organization and International League of Associations for Rheumatology core endpoints for symptom modifying antirheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. J Rheumatol 1994; S41: 86 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiarotto A, Deyo R, Terwee C, Boers M, Buchbinder R, Corbin T, et al. Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non‐specific low back pain. Eur Spine J 2015: 1 – 16.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
acr23254_am.pdf
Size:
230.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
acr23254.pdf
Size:
318.0KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.