View Item 

Show simple item record

Follow‐Up Survey on Functionality of Nutrition Documentation and Ordering Nutrition Therapy in Currently Available Electronic Health Record Systems
dc.contributor.authorVanek, Vincent W.
dc.contributor.authorAyers, Phil
dc.contributor.authorCharney, Pamela
dc.contributor.authorKraft, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMitchell, Ronelle
dc.contributor.authorPlogsted, Steven
dc.contributor.authorSoden, Jason
dc.contributor.authorVan Way, Charles W.
dc.contributor.authorWessel, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorWinter, John
dc.contributor.authorKent, Sue
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Peggy
dc.contributor.authorBouche, Jean
dc.contributor.authorQuirk, Donna
dc.contributor.authorSeidner, Douglas L.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:43:14Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:43:14Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationVanek, Vincent W.; Ayers, Phil; Charney, Pamela; Kraft, Michael; Mitchell, Ronelle; Plogsted, Steven; Soden, Jason; Van Way, Charles W.; Wessel, Jacqueline; Winter, John; Kent, Sue; Turner, Peggy; Bouche, Jean; Quirk, Donna; Seidner, Douglas L. (2016). "Follow‐Up Survey on Functionality of Nutrition Documentation and Ordering Nutrition Therapy in Currently Available Electronic Health Record Systems." Nutrition in Clinical Practice 31(3): 401-415.
dc.identifier.issn0884-5336
dc.identifier.issn1941-2452
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141915
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherSAGE Publications
dc.subject.othernutrition documentation
dc.subject.otherefficacy
dc.subject.otherelectronic health records
dc.subject.otherelectronic medical record
dc.subject.othersafety
dc.subject.otherhealth information management
dc.subject.othermedical order entry systems
dc.subject.othernutritional support
dc.subject.othernutrition therapy
dc.titleFollow‐Up Survey on Functionality of Nutrition Documentation and Ordering Nutrition Therapy in Currently Available Electronic Health Record Systems
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPublic Health
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelMedicine (General)
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAcademy NIC, Hospital Sisters Health System Eastern Wisconsin Division, Green Bay, WI, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAmerican Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.) Clinical Nutrition Informatics Committee (CNIS), St Elizabeth Youngstown Hospital, Youngstown, Ohio, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi
dc.contributor.affiliationotherA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, Bellevue College, Bellevue, Washington
dc.contributor.affiliationotherA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherA.S.P.E.N. CNIS, Director of Informatics, Central Admixture Pharmacy Services, Puyallup, Washington, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAcademy of Nutrition and Dietetics (Academy) Nutrition Informatics Committee (NIC), Clinical Systems Analyst, Center for Human Nutrition, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAcademy NIC, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherChair, Academy NIC Interoperability Standards Committee, Lexington Medical Center, West Columbia, South Carolina, USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherAmerican Society for Nutrition, Nutrition Education Committee, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141915/1/ncp0401.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0884533616629619
dc.identifier.sourceNutrition in Clinical Practice
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAyers P Adams S Boullata J et al. A.S.P.E.N. parenteral nutrition safety consensus recommendations. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 38 ( 3 ): 296 – 333.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMirtallo JM Guenter P. Introduction and goals of the A.S.P.E.N. parenteral nutrition safety summit. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012; 36 ( 2)(suppl ): 7S – 9S.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMirtallo J Canada T Johnson D et al. Safe practices for parenteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2004; 28: S39 – S70.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNational Advisory Group on Standards and Practice Guidelines for Parenteral Nutrition. Safe practices for parenteral nutrition formulations. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1998; 22: 49 – 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoullata JI. Overview of the parenteral nutrition use process. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012; 36 ( 2)(suppl ): 10S – 13S.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSacks GS. Safety surrounding parenteral nutrition systems. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2012; 36 ( 2)(suppl ): 20S – 22S.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePoissant L Pereira J Tamblyn R Kawasumi Y. The impact of electronic health records on time efficiency of physicians and nurses: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005; 12: 505 – 516.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMangalmurti SS Murtagh L Mello MM. Medical malpractice liability in the age of electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2010; 363: 2060 – 2067.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHarrington L Kennerly D Johnson C. Safety issues related to the electronic medical record (EMR): synthesis of the literature from the last decade, 2000‐2009. J Healthc Manag. 2011; 56: 31 – 44.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKoppel R Metlay JP Cohen A et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005; 293: 1197 – 1203.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWalsh KE Adams WG Bauchner H et al. Medication errors related to computerized order entry for children. Pediatrics. 2006; 118: 1872 – 1879.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll J. Meaningful use: tasty carrot or big, brutal stick? Manag Care. 2010; 19: 12 – 16, 23.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVanek VW. Providing nutrition support in the electronic health record era: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Nutr Clin Pract. 2012; 27 ( 6 ): 718 – 737.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoullata JI Guenter P Mirtallo JM. A parenteral nutrition use survey with gap analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2013; 37: 212 – 222.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKLAS. KLAS Research Web site. http://www.klasresearch.com/. Accessed September 17, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoullata JI Gilbert K Sacks G et al. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: parenteral nutrition ordering, order review, compounding, labeling, and dispensing. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014; 38 ( 3 ): 334 – 377.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThomson B. Carrots and sticks: electronic health records, meaningful use, and your practice. eQuoteMD Web site. http://www.equotemd.com/blog/carrots‐and‐sticks‐electronic‐healthrecords‐meaningful‐use‐and‐your‐practice/. Published April 2, 2015. Accessed September 21, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKasa Practice Solutions. What is the HITECH Act and how does it impact my practice? Kasa Practice Solutions Web site. http://www.kasa‐solutions.com/blog/hitech‐act‐impact‐practice/. Published January 5, 2014. Accessed September 21, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKing WJ Paice N Rangrej J Forestell GJ Swartz R. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication errors and adverse drug events in pediatric inpatients. Pediatrics. 2003; 112 ( 3, pt 1 ): 506 – 509.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHan YY Carcillo JA Venkataraman ST et al. Unexpected increased mortality after implementation of a commercially sold computerized physician order entry system. Pediatrics. 2005; 116: 1506 – 1512.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHimmelstein DU Wright A Woolhandler S. Hospital computing and the costs and quality of care: a national study. Am J Med. 2010; 123: 40 – 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHillestad R Bigelow J Bower A et al. Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005; 24: 1103 – 1117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJha AK DesRoches CM Campbell EG et al. Use of electronic health records in U.S. hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360: 1628 – 1638.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAmmenwerth E Schnell‐Inderst P Machan C Siebert U. The effect of electronic prescribing on medication errors and adverse drug events: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008; 15: 585 – 600.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKaushal R Shojania KG Bates DW. Effects of computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support systems on medication safety: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2003; 163: 1409 – 1416.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates DW Teich JM Lee J et al. The impact of computerized physician order entry on medication error prevention. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999; 6: 313 – 321.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Rosse F Maat B Rademaker CM van Vught AJ Egberts AC Bollen CW. The effect of computerized physician order entry on medication prescription errors and clinical outcome in pediatric and intensive care: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2009; 123: 1184 – 1190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUpperman JS Staley P Friend K et al. The impact of hospital wide computerized physician order entry on medical errors in a pediatric hospital. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40: 57 – 59.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBates DW Leape LL Cullen DJ et al. Effect of computerized physician order entry and a team intervention on prevention of serious medication errors. JAMA. 1998; 280: 1311 – 1316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHill PM Mareiniss D Murphy P et al. Significant reduction of laboratory specimen labeling errors by implementation of an electronic ordering system paired with a bar‐code specimen labeling process. Ann Emerg Med. 2010; 56: 630 – 636.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChaudhry B Wang J Wu S et al. Systematic review: impact of health information technology on quality, efficiency, and costs of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 2006; 144: 742 – 752.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMekhjian HS Kumar RR Kuehn L et al. Immediate benefits realized following implementation of physician order entry at an academic medical center. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002; 9: 529 – 539.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShih TH Fan X. Comparing response rates in e‐mail and paper surveys: a meta‐analysis. Educ Res Rev. 2009; 4: 26 – 40.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNulty DD. The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? Assess Eval High Educ. 2008; 33 ( 3 ): 301 – 314.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRay A. Typical response rates. Practical Surveys Web site. http://practicalsurveys.com/respondents/typicalresponserates.php. Published March 20, 2006. Updated March 12, 2015.Accessed September 22, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSeres D Sacks GS Pedersen CA et al. Parenteral nutrition safe practices: results of the 2003 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition survey. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2006; 30: 259 – 265.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ncp0401.pdf
Size:
137.6KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.