View Item 

Show simple item record

The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems
dc.contributor.authorCardinale, Bradley J.
dc.contributor.authorMatulich, Kristin L.
dc.contributor.authorHooper, David U.
dc.contributor.authorByrnes, Jarrett E.
dc.contributor.authorDuffy, Emmett
dc.contributor.authorGamfeldt, Lars
dc.contributor.authorBalvanera, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorO’Connor, Mary I.
dc.contributor.authorGonzalez, Andrew
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:44:28Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:44:28Z
dc.date.issued2011-03
dc.identifier.citationCardinale, Bradley J.; Matulich, Kristin L.; Hooper, David U.; Byrnes, Jarrett E.; Duffy, Emmett; Gamfeldt, Lars; Balvanera, Patricia; O’Connor, Mary I.; Gonzalez, Andrew (2011). "The functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems." American Journal of Botany 98(3): 572-592.
dc.identifier.issn0002-9122
dc.identifier.issn1537-2197
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/141994
dc.publisherBotanical Society of America
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity
dc.subject.otherdecomposition
dc.subject.otherecosystem functioning
dc.subject.otherherbivory
dc.subject.othernutrient cycling
dc.subject.otherprimary production
dc.titleThe functional role of producer diversity in ecosystems
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBiology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelBotany
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumSchool of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, 440 Church Street, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109 USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherNational Center for Ecological Analyses and Synthesis, 735 State Street, Suite 300, Santa Barbara, California, 93101 USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherMcGill University, Department of Biology, 1205 Docteur Penfield, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Zoology, University of British Columbia, #2370‐6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z4
dc.contributor.affiliationotherCentro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, C.P. 58190, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Mexico, D.F., Mexico
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Marine Ecology, University of G(ö)othenburg, Box 461, SE‐405 30 Göteborg, Sweden
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of California‐Irvine, 321 Steinhaus Hall, Irvine, California, 92697 USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherWestern Washington University, Department of Biology, Bellingham, Washington, 98225 USA
dc.contributor.affiliationotherVirginia Institute of Marine Science, College of William and Mary, P.O. Box 1346, Gloucester Point, Virginia, 23062 USA
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/141994/1/ajb20572.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.3732/ajb.1000364
dc.identifier.sourceAmerican Journal of Botany
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchlapfer, F., B. Schmid, and L. Seidl. 1999. Expert estimates about effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes and services. Oikos 84: 346 – 352.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaeem, S. 2002. Ecosystem consequences of biodiversity loss: The evolution of a paradigm. Ecology 83: 1537 – 1552.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaeem, S., L. J. Thompson, S. P. Lawler, J. H. Lawton, and R. M. Woodfin. 1994. Declining biodiversity can alter the performance of ecosystems. Nature 368: 734 – 737.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNiklaus, P. A., P. W. Leadley, B. Schmid, and C. Korner. 2001. A long‐term field study on biodiversity × elevated CO 2 interactions in grassland. Ecological Monographs 71: 341 – 356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNorthfield, T. D., G. B. Snyder, A. R. Ives, and W. E. Snyder. 2010. Niche saturation reveals resource partitioning among consumers. Ecology Letters 13: 338 – 348.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetchey, O. L. 2003. Integrating methods that investigate how complementarity influences ecosystem functioning. Oikos 101: 323 – 330.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetchey, O. L., A. Hector, and K. J. Gaston. 2004. How do different measures of functional diversity perform? Ecology 85: 847 – 857.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiotto, D. 2008. A meta‐analysis comparing tree growth in monocultures and mixed plantations. Forest Ecology and Management 255: 781 – 786.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolis, G. A., W. B. Anderson, and R. D. Holt. 1997. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: The dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28: 289 – 316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReich, P. B., J. Knops, D. Tilman, J. Craine, D. Ellsworth, M. Tjoelker, and T. Lee el al. 2001. Plant diversity enhances ecosystem responses to elevated CO 2 and nitrogen deposition. Nature 410: 809 – 812.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReinhardt, L., D. Jerolmack, B. J. Cardinale, V. Vanacker, and J. Wright. 2010. Dynamic interactions of life and its landscape: Feedbacks at the interface of geomorphology and ecology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 35: 78 – 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRockstrom, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone, A. Persson, F. S. Chapin, E. F. Lambin, and T. M. Lenton el al. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461: 472 – 475.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchindler, D. E., R. Hilborn, B. Chasco, C. P. Boatright, T. P. Quinn, L. A. Rogers, and M. S. Webster. 2010. Population diversity and the portfolio effect in an exploited species. Nature 465: 609 – 612.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid B., Balvanera P., Cardinale B. J., Godbold J., Pfisterer A. B., Raffaelli D., Solan M., Srivastava D. S. 2009a. Consequences of species loss for ecosystem functioning: A meta‐analysis of data from biodiversity experiments In Naeem S., Bunker D., Loreau M., Hector A., Perring C. [eds.], Biodiversity and human impacts, 14 – 29. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid, B., A. Hector, P. Saha, and M. Loreau. 2008. Biodiversity effects and transgressive overyielding. Journal of Plant Ecology 1: 95 – 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid B., Joshi J., Schlapfer F. 2001. Empirical evidence for biodiversity–ecosystem functioning relationships. In Kinzig A. P., Pacala S. W., Tilman D. [eds.], The functional consequences of biodiversity: Empirical progress and theoretical extensions, 120 – 150. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchmid, B., A. B. Pfisterer, P. Balvanera, and W. K. Michener. 2009b. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem, community, and population variables reported 1974–2004. Ecology 90: 853.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulze, E. D., and H. A. Mooney. 1993. Biodiversity and ecosystem function. Springer‐Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchwartz, M. W., C. A. Brigham, J. D. Hoeksema, K. G. Lyons, M. H. Mills, and P. J. van Mantgem. 2000. Linking biodiversity to ecosystem function: Implications for conservation ecology. Oecologia 122: 297 – 305.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrivastava, D. S., B. J. Cardinale, A. L. Downing, J. E. Duffy, C. Jouseau, M. Sankaran, and J. P. Wright. 2009. Diversity has stronger top‐down than bottom‐up effects on decomposition. Ecology 90: 1073 – 1083.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSrivastava, D. S., and M. Vellend. 2005. Biodiversity–ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation? Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 267 – 294.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStachowicz, J., J. F. Bruno, and J. E. Duffy. 2007. Understanding the effects of marine biodiversity on communities and ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 38: 739 – 766.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStachowicz, J. J., M. Graham, M. E. S. Bracken, and A. I. Szoboszlai. 2008. Diversity enhances cover and stability of seaweed assemblages: The role of heterogeneity and time. Ecology 89: 3008 – 3019.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStaddon, P., Z. Lindo, P. D. Crittenden, F. Gilbert, and A. Gonzalez. 2010. Connectivity, non‐random extinction and ecosystem function in experimental metacommunities. Ecology Letters 13: 543 – 552.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSterner, R. W., and J. J. Elser. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry: The biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStocker, R., C. Korner, B. Schmid, P. A. Niklaus, and P. W. Leadley. 1999. A field study of the effects of elevated CO 2 and plant species diversity on ecosystem‐level gas exchange in a planted calcareous grassland. Global Change Biology 5: 95 – 105.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D. 1999. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: A search for general principles. Ecology 80: 1455 – 1474.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D. 2000. Causes, consequences, and ethics of biodiversity. Nature 405: 208 – 211.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D., and J. A. Downing. 1994. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367: 363 – 365.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D., D. Lehman, and K. Thompson. 1997. Plant diversity and ecosystem productivity: Theoretical considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 94: 1857 – 1861.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D., P. B. Reich, J. Knops, D. Wedin, T. Mielke, and C. Lehman. 2001. Diversity and productivity in a long‐term grassland experiment. Science 294: 843 – 845.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTilman, D., D. Wedin, and J. Knops. 1996. Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature 379: 718 – 720.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTrenbath, B. R. 1974. Biomass productivity of mixtures. Advances in Agronomy 26: 177 – 210.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandermeer, J. H. 1989. The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVitousek, P. M., H. A. Mooney, J. Lubchenco, and J. M. Melillo. 1997. Human domination of Earth’s ecosystems. Science 277: 494 – 499.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeis, J. J., B. J. Cardinale, K. J. Forshay, and A. R. Ives. 2007. Effects of species diversity on community biomass production change over the course of succession. Ecology 88: 929 – 939.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWeis, J. J., D. Madrigal, and B. J. Cardinale. 2008. Effects of algal species richness on the production of community biomass in homogeneous verses heterogeneous environments. PLoS ONE 3: e2825.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorm, B., E. B. Barbier, N. Beaumont, J. E. Duffy, C. Folke, B. S. Halpern, and J. B. C. Jackson el al. 2006. Impacts of biodiversity loss on ocean ecosystem services. Science 314: 787 – 790.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWright, J. P., and C. G. Jones. 2006. The concept of organisms as ecosystem engineers ten years on: Progress, limitations, and challenges. Bioscience 56: 203 – 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZavaleta, E. S., J. R. Pasari, K. B. Hulvey, and G. D. Tilman. 2010. Sustaining multiple ecosystem functions in grassland communities requires higher biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107: 1443 – 1446.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAarssen, L. W. 1997. High productivity in grassland ecosystems: Effected by species diversity or productive species? Oikos 80: 183 – 184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAndow, D. A. 1991. Vegetational diversity and arthropod population response. Annual Review of Entomology 36: 561 – 586.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBalvanera, P., A. B. Pfisterer, N. Buchmann, J. S. He, T. Nakashizuka, D. Raffaelli, and B. Schmid. 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters 9: 1146 – 1156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyer, K. E., J. S. Kertesz, and J. F. Bruno. 2009. Biodiversity effects on productivity and stability of marine macroalgal communities: The role of environmental context. Oikos 118: 1062 – 1072.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBruno, J. F., and B. J. Cardinale. 2008. Cascading effects of predator richness. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 539 – 546.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCadotte, M. W., B. J. Cardinale, and T. H. Oakley. 2008. Evolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105: 17012 – 17017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., D. M. Bennett, C. E. Nelson, and K. Gross. 2009a. Does productivity drive diversity or vice versa? A test of the multivariate productivity–diversity hypothesis in streams. Ecology 90: 1227 – 1241.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale B. J., Duffy E., Srivastava D., Loreau M., Thomas M., Emmerson M. 2009b. Towards a food‐web perspective on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. In Naeem S., Bunker D., Loreau M., Hector A., Perring C. [eds.], Biodiversity and human impacts, 105 – 120. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., A. R. Ives, and P. Inchausti. 2004. Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: Extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference. Oikos 104: 437 – 450.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., D. S. Srivastava, J. E. Duffy, J. P. Wright, A. L. Downing, M. Sankaran, and C. Jouseau. 2006. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 443: 989 – 992.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., D. S. Srivastava, J. E. Duffy, J. P. Wright, A. L. Downing, M. Sankaran, and C. Jouseau el al. 2009c. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of ecosystems: A summary of 164 experimental manipulations of species richness. Ecology 90: 854 (data paper).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardinale, B. J., J. P. Wright, M. W. Cadotte, I. T. Carroll, A. Hector, D. S. Srivastava, M. Loreau, and J. J. Weis. 2007. Impacts of plant diversity on biomass production increase through time due to complementary resource use: A meta‐analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104: 18123 – 18128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCarroll, I. T., B. J. Cardinale, and R. M. Nisbet. In press. Niche and fitness differences relate the maintenance of diversity to ecosystem function. Ecology doi:10.1890/10‐0302.1.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChase, J. M., and M. A. Leibold. 2003. Ecological niches: Linking classical and contemporary approaches. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChesson, P. 2000. Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 31: 343 – 366.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovich, A. P., M. C. Austen, F. Barlocher, E. Chauvet, B. J. Cardinale, C. L. Biles, and P. Inchausti el al. 2004. The role of biodiversity in the functioning of freshwater and marine benthic ecosystems. Bioscience 54: 767 – 775.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDimitrakopoulos, P. G., and B. Schmid. 2004. Biodiversity effects increase linearly with biotope space. Ecology Letters 7: 574 – 583.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy, J. E. 2002. Biodiversity and ecosystem function: The consumer connection. Oikos 99: 201 – 219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy, J. E. 2009. Why biodiversity is important to the functioning of real‐world ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 437 – 444.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDuffy, J. E., B. J. Cardinale, K. E. France, P. B. McIntyre, E. Thébault, and M. Loreau. 2007. The functional role of biodiversity in ecosystems: Incorporating trophic complexity. Ecology Letters 10: 522 – 538.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEdwards, K. F., K. M. Aquilino, R. J. Best, K. L. Sellheim, and J. J. Stachowicz. 2010. Prey diversity is associated with weaker consumer effects in a meta‐analysis of benthic marine experiments. Ecology Letters 13: 194 – 201.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEhrlich, P. R., and A. H. Ehrlich. 1981. Extinction: The causes and consequences of the disappearance of species. Random House, New York, New York, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceField C. B. 1995. Productive capacity and biomass accumulation. In Programme U. N. E. [ed.], Global biodiversity assessment, 402 – 406. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFox, J. W. 2005. Interpreting the ‘selection effect’ of biodiversity on ecosystem function. Ecology Letters 8: 846 – 856.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFridley, J. D. 2003. Diversity effects on production in different light and fertility environments: An experiment with communities of annual plants. Journal of Ecology 91: 396 – 406.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGamfeldt, L., H. Hillebrand, and P. R. Jonsson. 2008. Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89: 1223 – 1231.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGartner, T. B., and Z. G. Cardon. 2004. Decomposition dynamics in mixed‐species leaf litter. Oikos 104: 230 – 246.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrace, J. B., M. T. Anderson, M. D. Smith, E. Seabloom, S. J. Andelman, G. Meche, and E. Weiher el al. 2007. Does species diversity limit productivity in natural grassland communities? Ecology Letters 10: 680 – 689.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffin, J. N., S. R. Jenkins, L. Gamfeldt, D. Jones, S. J. Hawkins, and R. C. Thompson. 2009. Spatial heterogeneity increases the importance of species richness for an ecosystem process. Oikos 118: 1335 – 1342.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrinnell, J. 1917. The niche‐relationship of the California thrasher. The Auk 34: 427 – 433.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHattenschwiler, S., A. V. Tiunov, and S. Scheu. 2005. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 36: 191 – 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHector, A. 1998. The effect of diversity on productivity: Detecting the role of species complementarity. Oikos 82: 597 – 599.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHector, A., and R. Bagchi. 2007. Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature 448: 188 – 190.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHector, A., B. Schmid, C. Beierkuhnlein, M. C. Caldeira, M. Diemer, P. G. Dimitrakopoulos, and J. A. Finn el al. 1999. Plant diversity and productivity experiments in European grasslands. Science 286: 1123 – 1127.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHedges, L. V., J. Gurevitch, and P. S. Curtis. 1999. The meta‐analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 80: 1150 – 1156.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHillebrand, H., and B. J. Cardinale. 2004. Consumer effects decline with prey diversity. Ecology Letters 7: 192 – 201.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHillebrand, H., and B. Matthiessen. 2009. Biodiversity in a complex world: Consolidation and progress in functional biodiversity research. Ecology Letters 12: 1405 – 1419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHooper, D. U., F. S. Chapin, J. J. Ewel, A. Hector, P. Inchausti, S. Lavorel, and J. H. Lawton el al. 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 3 – 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHooper, D. U., and J. S. Dukes. 2004. Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long‐term experiment. Ecology Letters 7: 95 – 105.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHughes, A. R., B. D. Inouye, M. T. J. Johnson, N. Underwood, and M. Vellend. 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecology Letters 11: 609 – 623.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHuston, M. A. 1997. Hidden treatments in ecological experiments: Re‐evaluating the ecosystem function of biodiversity. Oecologia 110: 449 – 460.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHutchinson, G. E. 1967. A treatise on limnology, vol. 2, Introduction to lake biology and the limnoplankton. Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJiang, L., Z. Pu, and D. R. Nemergut. 2008. On the importance of the negative selection effect for the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. Oikos 117: 488 – 493.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJones, C. G., J. H. Lawton, and M. Shachak. 1994. Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69: 373 – 386.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLevine, J. M., and J. HilleRisLambers. 2009. The importance of niches for the maintenance of species diversity. Nature 461: 254 – 257.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoreau, M. 1998. Separating sampling and other effects in biodiversity experiments. Oikos 82: 600 – 602.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoreau, M. 2004. Does functional redundancy exist? Oikos 104: 606 – 611.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoreau, M., and A. Hector. 2001. Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412: 72 – 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoreau, M., N. Mouquet, and A. Gonzalez. 2003. Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 100: 12765 – 12770.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLoreau, M., S. Naeem, P. Inchausti, J. Bengtsson, J. P. Grime, A. Hector, and D. U. Hooper el al. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: Current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294: 804 – 808.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcCann, K. S., J. B. Rasmussen, and J. Umbanhowar. 2005. The dynamics of spatially coupled food webs. Ecology Letters 8: 513 – 523.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMillennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well‐being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, D.C., USA.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaeem, S. 1998. Species redundancy and ecosystem reliability. Conservation Biology 12: 39 – 45.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNaeem S. 2001. Experimental validity and ecological scale as tools for evaluating research programs. In Gardner R. H., Kemp W. M., Kennedy V. S., Petersen J. E. [eds.], Scaling relationships in experimental ecology, 223 – 250. Columbia University Press, New York New York, USA.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
ajb20572.pdf
Size:
1.827MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.