Show simple item record

Why and How to Write a High‐Impact Review Paper: Lessons From Eight Years of Editorial Board Service to Reviews of Geophysics

dc.contributor.authorMoldwin, Mark B.
dc.contributor.authorFlorindo, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorOkin, Gregory
dc.contributor.authorRobock, Alan
dc.contributor.authorRohling, Eelco J.
dc.contributor.authorCardenas, Bayani
dc.contributor.authorCarlton, Annmarie
dc.contributor.authorChen, Kate Huihsuan
dc.contributor.authorCrucifix, Michel
dc.contributor.authorGettelman, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorHubbard, Alun
dc.contributor.authorKatsura, Tomoo
dc.contributor.authorPainter, Thomas H.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:45:22Z
dc.date.available2019-01-07T18:34:38Zen
dc.date.issued2017-12
dc.identifier.citationMoldwin, Mark B.; Florindo, Fabio; Okin, Gregory; Robock, Alan; Rohling, Eelco J.; Cardenas, Bayani; Carlton, Annmarie; Chen, Kate Huihsuan; Crucifix, Michel; Gettelman, Andrew; Hubbard, Alun; Katsura, Tomoo; Painter, Thomas H. (2017). "Why and How to Write a High‐Impact Review Paper: Lessons From Eight Years of Editorial Board Service to Reviews of Geophysics." Reviews of Geophysics 55(4): 860-863.
dc.identifier.issn8755-1209
dc.identifier.issn1944-9208
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142045
dc.description.abstractHigh‐impact review papers describe and synthesize the current state of the art, the open questions and controversies, and provide ideas for future investigations. They are written not only for a specific scientific discipline but also for the broader Earth and space science community. They not only summarize the literature, but they also create a framework from which to understand the progress, problems, and connections between different communities, observations, models, and approaches. Here we describe how to write a high‐impact review paper, and why you should consider writing one for Reviews of Geophysics.Plain Language SummaryWe describe how to write a high‐impact review paper, and why you should consider writing one for Reviews of Geophysics.Key PointsReview papers play a major role in scientific communication and education and moving a research field forwardReviews of Geophysics is the top rated journal in Geophysics and GeochemistryHigh‐impact review papers describe and synthesize the current state of the art, the open questions and controversies, and are forward looking
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherbibliometrics
dc.subject.otherreview paper
dc.titleWhy and How to Write a High‐Impact Review Paper: Lessons From Eight Years of Editorial Board Service to Reviews of Geophysics
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelGeological Sciences
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelScience
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142045/1/rog20148_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142045/2/rog20148.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/2017RG000587
dc.identifier.sourceReviews of Geophysics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFalagas, M. E., & Alexiou, V. G. ( 2008 ). The top‐ten in journal impact factor manipulation. Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis, 56 ( 4 ), 223 – 226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00005‐008‐0024‐5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHansen, J., Ruedy, R., Sato, M., & Lo, K. ( 2010 ). Global surface temperature change. Reviews of Geophysics, 48, RG4004. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010RG000345
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe PLoS Medicine Editors ( 2006 ). The impact factor game. PLoS Medicine, 3 ( 6 ), e291. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMukherjee, S., Romero, D. M., Jones, B., & Uzzi, B. ( 2017 ). The nearly universal link between the age of past knowledge and tomorrow’s breakthroughs in science and technology: The hotspot. Science Advances, 3 ( 4 ), e1601315. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601315
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanson, B. ( 2017 ). Journal impact factors with uncertainties, Eos.org. Retrieved from https://eos.org/editors‐vox/journal‐impact‐factors‐with‐uncertainties
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.