Show simple item record

Regional gastrointestinal contractility parameters using the wireless motility capsule: interâ observer reproducibility and influence of age, gender and study country

dc.contributor.authorFarmer, A. D.
dc.contributor.authorWegeberg, A.‐m. L.
dc.contributor.authorBrock, B.
dc.contributor.authorHobson, A. R.
dc.contributor.authorMohammed, S. D.
dc.contributor.authorScott, S. M.
dc.contributor.authorBruckner‐holt, C. E.
dc.contributor.authorSemler, J. R.
dc.contributor.authorHasler, W. L.
dc.contributor.authorHellström, P. M.
dc.contributor.authorDrewes, A. M.
dc.contributor.authorBrock, C.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:45:39Z
dc.date.available2019-04-01T15:01:10Zen
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.identifier.citationFarmer, A. D.; Wegeberg, A.‐m. L. ; Brock, B.; Hobson, A. R.; Mohammed, S. D.; Scott, S. M.; Bruckner‐holt, C. E. ; Semler, J. R.; Hasler, W. L.; Hellström, P. M. ; Drewes, A. M.; Brock, C. (2018). "Regional gastrointestinal contractility parameters using the wireless motility capsule: interâ observer reproducibility and influence of age, gender and study country." Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 47(3): 391-400.
dc.identifier.issn0269-2813
dc.identifier.issn1365-2036
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142062
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleRegional gastrointestinal contractility parameters using the wireless motility capsule: interâ observer reproducibility and influence of age, gender and study country
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPharmacy and Pharmacology
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelOtolaryngology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142062/1/apt14438_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142062/2/apt14438.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/apt.14438
dc.identifier.sourceAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarshop K, Staller K, Semler J, Kuo B. Duodenal rather than antral motility contractile parameters correlate with symptom severity in gastroparesis patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 339 â 346.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCassilly D, Kantor S, Knight LC, et al. Gastric emptying of a nonâ digestible solid: assessment with simultaneous SmartPill pH and pressure capsule, antroduodenal manometry, gastric emptying scintigraphy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008; 20: 311 â 319.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHasler WL. The use of SmartPill for gastric monitoring. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 8: 587 â 600.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaad RJ. The Wireless Motility Capsule: a Oneâ Stop Shop for the Evaluation of GI Motility Disorders. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016; 18: 14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao SS, Kuo B, McCallum RW, et al. Investigation of colonic and wholeâ gut transit with wireless motility capsule and radiopaque markers in constipation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009; 7: 537 â 544.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHobson R, Farmer AD, Dewit OE, et al. The effects of camicinal, a novel motilin agonist, on gastroâ esophageal function in healthy humansâ a randomized placebo controlled trial. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 1629 â 1637.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZarate N, Mohammed SD, O’Shaughnessy E, et al. Accurate localization of a fall in pH within the ileocecal region: validation using a dualâ scintigraphic technique. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2010; 299: G1276 â G1286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSarosiek I, Selover KH, Katz LA, et al. The assessment of regional gut transit times in healthy controls and patients with gastroparesis using wireless motility technology. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010; 31: 313 â 322.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOuyang A, Sunshine AG, Reynolds JC. Caloric content of a meal affects duration but not contractile pattern of duodenal motility in man. Dig Dis Sci. 1989; 34: 528 â 536.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCamilleri M, Brown ML, Malagelada JR. Relationship between impaired gastric emptying and abnormal gastrointestinal motility. Gastroenterology. 1986; 91: 94 â 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCamilleri M, Malagelada JR, Brown ML, Becker G, Zinsmeister AR. Relation between antral motility and gastric emptying of solids and liquids in humans. Am J Physiol. 1985; 249: G580 â G585.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYen M, Lo LH. Examining testâ retest reliability: an intraâ class correlation approach. Nurs Res. 2002; 51: 59 â 62.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbell TL, Camilleri M, Donohoe K, et al. Consensus recommendations for gastric emptying scintigraphy: a joint report of the American neurogastroenterology and motility society and the society of nuclear medicine. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008; 103: 753 â 763.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao SS, Rattanakovit K, Patcharatrakul T. Diagnosis and management of chronic constipation in adults. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 13: 295 â 305.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlyami J, Spiller RC, Marciani L. Magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate gastrointestinal function. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 1687 â 1692.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHasler WL. Gastroparesis: pathogenesis, diagnosis and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011; 8: 438 â 453.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHoldstock DJ, Misiewicz JJ, Smith T, Rowlands EN. Propulsion (mass movements) in the human colon and its relationship to meals and somatic activity. Gut. 1970; 11: 91 â 99.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThorburn HA, Carter KB, Goldberg JA, Finlay IG. Does ispaghula husk stimulate the entire colon in diverticular disease? Gut. 1992; 33: 352 â 356.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHasler WL, Saad RJ, Rao SS, et al. Heightened colon motor activity measured by a wireless capsule in patients with constipation: relation to colon transit and IBS. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2009; 297: G1107 â G1114.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao SC, Valestin J, Attaluri A, Wilding GE, Semler J. Interâ observer agreement for regional and whole gut transit measurement by wireless motility capsule in health, gastroparesis and constipation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 103: 498 â 499.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil. 1998; 12: 187 â 199.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDiaz Tartera HO, Webb DL, Alâ Saffar AK, et al. Validation of SmartPill(R) wireless motility capsule for gastrointestinal transit time: intraâ subject variability, software accuracy and comparison with video capsule endoscopy. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29: 1 â 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWald A, van Thiel DH, Hoechstetter L, et al. Gastrointestinal transit: the effect of the menstrual cycle. Gastroenterology. 1981; 80: 1497 â 1500.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePatcharatrakul T, Gonlachanvit S. Technique of functional and motility test: how to perform antroduodenal manometry. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 19: 395 â 404.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin AY, Du P, Dinning PG, et al. Highâ resolution anatomic correlation of cyclic motor patterns in the human colon: evidence of a rectosigmoid brake. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2017; 312: G508 â G515.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSavarino E, Mei F, Parodi A, et al. Gastrointestinal motility disorder assessment in systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013; 52: 1095 â 1100.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKloetzer L, Chey WD, McCallum RW, et al. Motility of the antroduodenum in healthy and gastroparetics characterized by wireless motility capsule. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010; 22: 527 â 533.e117.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarshop K, Kuo B. Connecting the dots between gastrointestinal motility and symptoms using wireless motility capsule testing. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60: 1120 â 1122.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGronlund D, Poulsen JL, Sandberg TH, et al. Established and emerging methods for assessment of small and large intestinal motility. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017; 29. 10.1111/nmo.13008
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCamilleri M, Thorne NK, Ringel Y, et al. Wireless pHâ motility capsule for colonic transit: prospective comparison with radiopaque markers in chronic constipation. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010; 22: 874 â 882. e233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSegui S, Drozdzal M, Zaytseva E, et al. Detection of wrinkle frames in endoluminal videos using betweenness centrality measures for images. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014; 18: 1831 â 1838.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDinning PG, Scott SM. Novel diagnostics and therapy of colonic motor disorders. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011; 11: 624 â 629.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarmer AD, Coen SJ, Kano M, et al. Psychological traits influence autonomic nervous system recovery following esophageal intubation in health and functional chest pain. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2013; 25: 950 â e772.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDinning PG, Carrington EV, Scott SM. The use of colonic and anorectal highâ resolution manometry and its place in clinical work and in research. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015; 27: 1693 â 1708.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCamilleri M, Bharucha AE, di Lorenzo C, et al. American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society consensus statement on intraluminal measurement of gastrointestinal and colonic motility in clinical practice. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2008; 20: 1269 â 1282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFarmer AD, Scott SM, Hobson AR. Gastrointestinal motility revisited: the wireless motility capsule. United European Gastroenterol J. 2013; 1: 413 â 421.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaqbool S, Parkman HP, Friedenberg FK. Wireless capsule motility: comparison of the SmartPill GI monitoring system with scintigraphy for measuring whole gut transit. Dig Dis Sci. 2009; 54: 2167 â 2174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWang YT, Mohammed SD, Farmer AD, et al. Regional gastrointestinal transit and pH studied in 215 healthy volunteers using the wireless motility capsule: influence of age, gender, study country and testing protocol. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015; 42: 761 â 772.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.