View Item 

Show simple item record

Do Implant Length and Width Matter for Short Dental Implants (<10 mm)? A Metaâ Analysis of Prospective Studies
dc.contributor.authorMonje, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorFu, Jia‐hui
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun‐liang
dc.contributor.authorSuarez, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorGalindo‐moreno, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorCatena, Andrés
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:45:45Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:45:45Z
dc.date.issued2013-12
dc.identifier.citationMonje, Alberto; Fu, Jia‐hui ; Chan, Hsun‐liang ; Suarez, Fernando; Galindo‐moreno, Pablo ; Catena, Andrés ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2013). "Do Implant Length and Width Matter for Short Dental Implants (<10 mm)? A Metaâ Analysis of Prospective Studies." Journal of Periodontology 84(12): 1783-1791.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142067
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.othersurvival rate
dc.subject.otherAlveolar bone loss
dc.subject.otherevidenceâ based dentistry
dc.subject.otherlongitudinal studies
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.titleDo Implant Length and Width Matter for Short Dental Implants (<10 mm)? A Metaâ Analysis of Prospective Studies
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Granada.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDiscipline of Periodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142067/1/jper1783.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2013.120745
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, Pharoah M, Adegbembo AO, Deporter D. An assessment of crownâ toâ root ratios with short sintered porousâ surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 69 â 76.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChuang SK, Cai T. Predicting clustered dental implant survival using frailty methods. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 1147 â 1151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChang SH, Lin CL, Hsue SS, Lin YS, Huang SR. Biomechanical analysis of the effects of implant diameter and bone quality in short implants placed in the atrophic posterior maxilla. Med Eng Phys 2012; 34: 153 â 160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandeweghe S, Ackermann A, Bronner J, Hattingh A, Tschakaloff A, De Bruyn H. A retrospective, multicenter study on a novo wideâ body implant for posterior regions. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: 281 â 292.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandeweghe S, De Ferrerre R, Tschakaloff A, De Bruyn H. A wideâ body implant as an alternative for sinus lift or bone grafting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011; 69: e67 â e74.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 254 â 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceYang TC, Maeda Y, Gonda T. Biomechanical rationale for short implants in splinted restorations: An in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2011; 24: 130 â 132.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulte J, Flores AM, Weed M. Crownâ toâ implant ratios of single tooth implantâ supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98: 1 â 5.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implantâ supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 204 â 211.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, Andía I. Fiveâ year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: A retrospective study. J Periodontol 2008; 79: 42 â 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBirdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang SK. Crownâ toâ implant ratios of shortâ length implants. J Oral Implantol 2010; 36: 425 â 433.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, Wright RF. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 377 â 381.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLanger B, Langer L, Herrmann I, Jorneus L. The wide fixture: A solution for special bone situations and a rescue for the compromised implant. Part 1. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8: 400 â 408.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIvanoff CJ, Sennerby L, Johansson C, Rangert B, Lekholm U. Influence of implant diameters on the integration of screw implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 141 â 148.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePetrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: Influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A threeâ dimensional finiteâ element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 486 â 494.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G. Impact of dental implant length on early failure rates: A metaâ analysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 856 â 863.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNeldam CA, Pinholt EM. State of the art of short dental implants: A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: 622 â 632.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOchi S, Morris HF, Winkler S; Dental Implant Clinical Research Group. The influence of implant type, material, coating, diameter, and length on periotest values at secondâ stage surgery: DICRG interim report no. 4. Implant Dent 1994; 3: 159 â 162.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE. Wideâ diameter implants: Surgical, loading, and prosthetic considerations. Dent Today 2006; 25: 66, 68 â 71.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Coulthard P, Thomsen P, Worthington HV. The role of implant surface modifications, shape and material on the success of osseointegrated dental implants. A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005; 13: 15 â 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE, Dietshâ Misch F, Hoar J, Beck G, Hazen R, Misch CM. A bone qualityâ based implant system: First year of prosthetic loading. J Oral Implantol 1999; 25: 185 â 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: A 3â dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 357 â 368.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B. Failure rates of short (â ¤10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 816 â 825.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porousâ surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000; 20: 476 â 485.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRenouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: A 2â year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7 ( Suppl. 1 ): S104 â S110.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWidmark G, Andersson B, Carlsson GE, Lindvall AM, Ivanoff CJ. Rehabilitation of patients with severely resorbed maxillae by means of implants with or without bone grafts: A 3â to 5â year followâ up clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 73 â 79.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHolmes DC, Loftus JT. Influence of bone quality on stress distribution for endosseous implants. J Oral Implantol 1997; 23: 104 â 111.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (â ¤7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol 2004; 75: 798 â 804.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBischof M, Nedir R, Abi Najm S, Szmuklerâ Moncler S, Samson J. A fiveâ year lifeâ table analysis on wide neck ITI implants with prosthetic evaluation and radiographic analysis: Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 512 â 520.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLi T, Kong L, Wang Y, et al. Selection of optimal dental implant diameter and length in type IV bone: A threeâ dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 38: 1077 â 1083.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePietrokovski J, Massler M. Alveolar ridge resorption following tooth extraction. J Prosthet Dent 1967; 17: 21 â 27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHammerle CH, Jung RE, Feloutzis A. A systematic review of the survival of implants in bone sites augmented with barrier membranes (guided bone regeneration) in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29(Suppl. 3):226â 231; discussion 232â 233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcAllister BS, Haghighat K. Bone augmentation techniques. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 377 â 396.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBoyne PJ. Augmentation of the posterior maxilla by way of sinus grafting procedures: Recent research and clinical observations. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2004; 16: 19 â 31, vâ vi.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Rimondini L. Autogenous onlay bone grafts vs. alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: A 2â 4â year prospective study on humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 432 â 440.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 ( Suppl. ): 237 â 259.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceChiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17 ( Suppl. 2 ): 136 â 159.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE. Short dental implants: A literature review and rationale for use. Dent Today 2005; 24: 64 â 66, 68.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEsposito M, Cannizzaro G, Soardi E, et al. Posterior atrophic jaws rehabilitated with prostheses supported by 6 mmâ long, 4 mmâ wide implants or by longer implants in augmented bone. Preliminary results from a pilot randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2012; 5: 19 â 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, et al. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990; 5: 272 â 281.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Chan HL, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindoâ Moreno P, Wang HL. Are short dental implants (<10mm) effective? A metaâ analysis on prospective clinical trials. J Periodontol 2013; 84: 895 â 904.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMonje A, Chan HL, Suarez F, Galindoâ Moreno P, Wang HL. Marginal bone loss around tilted implants in comparison to straight implants: A metaâ analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2012; 27: 1576 â 1583.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDel Fabbro M, Bellini CM, Romeo D, Francetti L. Tilted implants for the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws: A systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: 612 â 621.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTakahashi T, Shimamura I, Sakurai K. Influence of number and inclination angle of implants on stress distribution in mandibular cortical bone with Allâ onâ 4 Concept. J Prosthodont Res 2010; 54: 179 â 184.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWinkler S, Morris HF, Ochi S. Implant survival to 36 months as related to length and diameter. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 22 â 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJokstad A. The evidence for endorsing the use of short dental implants remains inconclusive. Evid Based Dent 2011; 12: 99 â 101.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTelleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 667 â 676.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNedir R, Bischof M, Szmuklerâ Moncler S, Bernard JP, Samson J. Predicting osseointegration by means of implant primary stability. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 520 â 528.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGriffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: A retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 139 â 144.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 129 â 136.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSato Y, Shindoi N, Hosokawa R, Tsuga K, Akagawa Y. A biomechanical effect of wide implant placement and offset placement of three implants in the posterior partially edentulous region. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 15 â 21.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSohrabi K, Mushantat A, Esfandiari S, Feine J. How successful are smallâ diameter implants? A literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 515 â 525.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceten Bruggenkate CM, Asikainen P, Foitzik C, Krekeler G, Sutter F. Short (6â mm) nonsubmerged dental implants: Results of a multicenter clinical trial of 1 to 7 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998; 13: 791 â 798.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolizzi G, Rangert B, Lekholm U, Gualini F, Lindström H. BrÃ¥nemark System Wide Platform implants for single molar replacement: Clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 61 â 69.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, Lang NP, Botticelli D. Early loading of single crowns supported by 6â mmâ long implants with a moderately rough surface: A prospective 2â year followâ up cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 937 â 943.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMcGlumphy EA, Peterson LJ, Larsen PE, Jeffcoat MK. Prospective study of 429 hydroxyapatiteâ coated cylindric omniloc implants placed in 121 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 82 â 92.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGuljé F, Raghoebar GM, Ter Meulen JW, Vissink A, Meijer HJ. Mandibular overdentures supported by 6â mm dental implants: A 1â year prospective cohort study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14 ( Suppl. 1 ): e59 â e66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan Assche N, Michels S, Quirynen M, Naert I. Extra short dental implants supporting an overdenture in the edentulous maxilla: A proof of concept. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 567 â 576.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePerelli M, Abundo R, Corrente G, Saccone C. Short (5 and 7 mm long) porous implant in the posterior atrophic mandible: A 5â year report of a prospective study. Eur J Oral Implantology 2011; 4: 363 â 368.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePieri F, Aldini NN, Fini M, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Preliminary 2â year report on treatment outcomes for 6â mmâ long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Int J Prosthodont 2012; 25: 279 â 289.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePieri F, Aldini NN, Fini M, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G. Retraction. Rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla using short implants or sinus augmentation with simultaneous standardâ length implant placement: A 3â year randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: 924.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDeporter D, Watson P, Pharoah M, Levy D, Todescan R. Fiveâ to sixâ year results of a prospective clinical trial using the ENDOPORE dental implant and a mandibular overdenture. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 95 â 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFerrigno N, Laureti M, Fanali S. Dental implants placement in conjunction with osteotome sinus floor elevation: A 12â year lifeâ table analysis from a prospective study on 588 ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 194 â 205.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmuklerâ Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7â year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 150 â 157.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiller J, Noack N, Hoffmann J. Survival rate of IMZ implants: A prospective 10â year analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 691 â 695.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTestori T, Del Fabbro M, Feldman S, et al. A multicenter prospective evaluation of 2â months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3â year followâ up results. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 154 â 161.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chiapasco M, Lops D. Short (8â mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: A 3â to 14â year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 586 â 592.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnnibali S, Cristalli MP, Dell’Aquila D, Bignozzi I, La Monaca G, Pilloni A. Short dental implants: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2012; 91: 25 â 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 275 â 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTawil G, Younan R. Clinical evaluation of short, machinedâ surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 894 â 901.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Rangert B. Short implants placed oneâ stage in maxillae and mandibles: A retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of followâ up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2007; 9: 15 â 21.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper1783.pdf
Size:
705.8KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.