Show simple item record

Evaluation of a needle disinfectant technique to reduce infection‐related hospitalisation after transrectal prostate biopsy

dc.contributor.authorAuffenberg, Gregory B.
dc.contributor.authorQi, Ji
dc.contributor.authorGao, Yuqing
dc.contributor.authorMiller, David C.
dc.contributor.authorYe, Zaojun
dc.contributor.authorBrachulis, Andrew
dc.contributor.authorLinsell, Susan
dc.contributor.authorGandhi, Tejal N.
dc.contributor.authorKraklau, David
dc.contributor.authorMontie, James E.
dc.contributor.authorGhani, Khurshid R.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:45:52Z
dc.date.available2019-04-01T15:01:10Zen
dc.date.issued2018-02
dc.identifier.citationAuffenberg, Gregory B.; Qi, Ji; Gao, Yuqing; Miller, David C.; Ye, Zaojun; Brachulis, Andrew; Linsell, Susan; Gandhi, Tejal N.; Kraklau, David; Montie, James E.; Ghani, Khurshid R. (2018). "Evaluation of a needle disinfectant technique to reduce infection‐related hospitalisation after transrectal prostate biopsy." BJU International 121(2): 232-238.
dc.identifier.issn1464-4096
dc.identifier.issn1464-410X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142074
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otherquality improvement
dc.subject.otherinfection
dc.subject.otherprostate cancer
dc.subject.otherprostate biopsy
dc.titleEvaluation of a needle disinfectant technique to reduce infection‐related hospitalisation after transrectal prostate biopsy
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelInternal Medicine and Specialties
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142074/1/bju13982_am.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142074/2/bju13982.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/bju.13982
dc.identifier.sourceBJU International
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTaylor AK, Zembower TR, Nadler RB et al. Targeted antimicrobial prophylaxis using rectal swab cultures in men undergoing transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is associated with reduced incidence of postoperative infectious complications and cost of care. J Urol 2012; 187: 1275 – 9
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiss MA, Ehdaie B, Loeb S et al. An update of the American Urological Association White Paper on the Prevention and Treatment of the More Common Complications Related to Prostate Biopsy. J Urol 2017; 198: 329 – 34
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWomble PR, Montie JE, Ye Z et al. Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low‐risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 44 – 50
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIssa MM, Al‐Qassab UA, Hall J, Ritenour CW, Petros JA, Sullivan JW. Formalin disinfection of biopsy needle minimizes the risk of sepsis following prostate biopsy. J Urol 2013; 190: 1769 – 75
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSymons JL, Huo A, Yuen CL et al. Outcomes of transperineal template‐guided prostate biopsy in 409 patients. BJU Int 2013; 112: 585 – 93
dc.identifier.citedreferencePark DS1, Oh JJ, Lee JH, Jang WK, Hong YK, Hong SK. Simple use of the suppository type povidone‐iodine can prevent infectious complications in transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate biopsy. Adv Urol 2009; 750598. Epub 2009 Apr 23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/750598.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWomble PR, Linsell SM, Gao Y et al. A Statewide intervention to reduce hospitalizations after prostate biopsy. J Urol 2015; 194: 403 – 9
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFeliciano J, Teper E, Ferrandino M et al. The incidence of fluoroquinolone resistant infections after prostate biopsy–are fluoroquinolones still effective prophylaxis? J Urol 2008; 179: 952 – 5
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication ‐FDA updates warnings for oral and injectable fluoroquinolone antibiotics due to disabling side effects. Published: 12 May 2016. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm511530.htm. Accessed August 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceThe National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). International Chemical Safety Cards: Isopropyl Alcohol. Edition: 22 July 2015. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ipcsneng/neng0554.html. Accessed August 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWorld Health Organization. Formaldehyde. In: Air Quality Guidelines, 2nd edn, Chapter 5.8, 2001. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/123062/AQG2ndEd_5_8Formaldehyde.pdf. Accessed August 2017
dc.identifier.citedreferenceUnited States Environmental Protection Agency. 2012 Edition of the Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories. EPA Publication 822‐S‐12‐001. April 2012. Available at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/dwstandards2012.pdf. Accessed August 2017.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHanley JA, Negassa A, Edwardes MD, Forrester JE. Statistical analysis of correlated data using generalized estimating equations: an orientation. Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157: 364 – 75
dc.identifier.citedreferenceZeger SL, Liang KY, Albert PS. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 1049 – 60
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.