View Item 

Show simple item record

Dimensions of Temperament: Affect Intensity and Consumer Lifestyles
dc.contributor.authorMoore, David J.
dc.contributor.authorHomer, Pamela M.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:45:57Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.citationMoore, David J.; Homer, Pamela M. (2000). "Dimensions of Temperament: Affect Intensity and Consumer Lifestyles." Journal of Consumer Psychology 9(4): 231-242.
dc.identifier.issn1057-7408
dc.identifier.issn1532-7663
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142080
dc.publisherAssociation for Consumer Research
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.titleDimensions of Temperament: Affect Intensity and Consumer Lifestyles
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Sport Management and Communication and School of Business Administration, University of Michigan
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Marketing, California State University, Long Beach
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142080/1/jcpy231.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1207/S15327663JCP0904_5
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Consumer Psychology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.J. Moore, W.D. Harris, H.C. Chen. Affect intensity: An individual difference response to advertising appeals. Journal of Consumer Research. 1995; 22: 154 – 164.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.J. Larsen, E. Diener. Affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic: A review. Journal of Research in Personality. 1987; 21: 1 – 39.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.J. Larsen, E. Diener, R.A. Emmons. Affect intensity and reactions to daily life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986; 57: 803 – 814.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS.R. Maddi. Personality theories: A comparative analysis. 5th ed. Chicago: Dorsey. 1989.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMehrabian, A. (1979). Manual for the questionnaire measure of stimulus screening and arousability. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.J. Moore. Affect intensity and empathic emotions: An individual difference measure of advertising response. Journal of Marketing Communication. 1995; 1: 71 – 89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.J. Moore, W. Harris. Affect intensity and the consumer response to high impact emotional advertising appeals. Journal of Advertising. 1996; 25: 37 – 50.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Petrie. Individuality in pain and suffering. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1967.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.S. Raju. Optimum stimulation level: Its relationship to personality, demographics, and exploratory behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. 1980; 7: 272 – 282.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.L. Richins. A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research. 1992; 19: 303 – 316.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.E.M. Steenkamp, H. Baumgartner. The role of optimum stimulation level in exploratory consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research. 1992; 19: 434 – 448.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.B. Stiff, J.P. Dillard, L. Somera, H. Kim, C. Sleight. Empathy, communication, and prosocial behavior. Communication Monographs. 1988; 55: 198 – 213.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP.A. Stout, J.D. Leckenby. Measuring emotional response to advertising. Journal of Advertising. 1986; 15: 35 – 42.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ. Strelau. Biologically determined dimensions of personality or temperament?. Personality and Individual Differences. 1982; 3: 355 – 360.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Thomas, S. Chess, H.G. Birch. The origin of personality. Scientifc American. 1970; 223: 102 – 109.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.P. Venkatraman, D. Marlino, F.R. Kardes, K.B. Sklar. The interactive effects of message appeal and individual differences on information processing and persuasion. Psychology & Marketing. 1990; 7: 85 – 96.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM. Zuckerman. Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1979.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.F. Alwitt. Consumer personality characteristics can help guide marketing and creative strategies. Journal of Direct Marketing. 1991; 5: 39 – 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.P. Bagozzi. ACR fellow speech. In C.T. Allen, D.R. John, eds. Advances in consumer research. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research. 1994; Vol. 21, 8.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBagozzi, R. P., & Moore, D. J. (1996). The reliability and the structural components of affect intensity and need for cognition. Unpublished manuscript, School of Business, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG.E. Barnes. Individual differences in perceptual reactance: A review of the stimulus–intensity–modulation individual difference dimension. Canadian Psychological Review. 1976; 17: 29 – 52.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR. Batra, M.L. Ray. Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research. 1986; 13: 234 – 249.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.E. Berlyne. Conflict, arousal and curiosity. New York: McGraw‐Hill. 1960.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.H. Buss, R. Plomin. A temperament theory of personality development. New York: Wiley. 1975.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.H. Davis. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983; 44: 113 – 126.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceE. Diener, E. Sandvik, R.J. Larsen. Age and sex effects for emotional intensity. Developmental Psychology. 1985; 21: 542 – 546.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.M. Digman, A.G. Shmelyov. The structure of temperament and personality in Russian children. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1996; 77: 341 – 351.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceN.S. Endler, A.J. Rosenstein. Evolution of the personality construct in marketing and its applicability to contemporary personality research. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1997; 6: 55 – 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.J. Eysenck. The biological basis of personality. Springfield, IL: Thomas. 1967.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.W. Fiske, S.R. Maddi. Functions of varied experience. Homewood, IL: Dorsey. 1961.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.F. Halvorson, G.A. Kohnstamm, R.P. Martin. The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to childhood. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. 1994.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.P. Haugtvedt, R.E. Petty, J.T. Cacioppo. Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 1992; 1: 239 – 260.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD.O. Hebb. Drives and the CNS (conceptual nervous system). Psychological Review. 1955; 62: 243 – 254.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHomer, P. M., & Moore, D. J. (1998). The relationship between affect intensity and sensation seeking. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.E. Izard. Human emotions. New York: Plenum. 1977.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL.R. Kahle, S. Beatty, P.M. Homer. Alternative measurement approaches to consumer values: The List of Values (LOV) and Values and Lifestyles (VALS). Journal of Consumer Research. 1986; 13: 405 – 409.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLarsen, R. J. (1984). Theory and measurement of affect intensity as an individual difference characteristic. Dissertation Abstracts International, 85, 2297B. (University Microfilms No. 84–22112).
dc.identifier.citedreferenceR.J. Larsen, D.W. Billings, S.E. Cute. Affect intensity and individual differences in informational style. Journal of Personality. 1996; 64: 185 – 207.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jcpy231.pdf
Size:
1.278MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.