View Item 

Show simple item record

Using the Support Immersion Endoscope for Socket Assessment
dc.contributor.authorJuodzbalys, Gintaras
dc.contributor.authorBojarskas, Stasys
dc.contributor.authorKubilius, Ricardas
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:46:08Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:46:08Z
dc.date.issued2008-01
dc.identifier.citationJuodzbalys, Gintaras; Bojarskas, Stasys; Kubilius, Ricardas; Wang, Hom‐lay (2008). "Using the Support Immersion Endoscope for Socket Assessment." Journal of Periodontology 79(1): 64-71.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142093
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.subject.otheresthetics
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.otherendoscope
dc.titleUsing the Support Immersion Endoscope for Socket Assessment
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Kaunas University of Medicine, Kaunas, Lithuania.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142093/1/jper0064.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2008.070253
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHämmerle CHF, Lang NP. Singleâ stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 9 â 18.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSaadoun AP, Landsberg TC. Treatment classifications and sequencing for post extraction implant therapy: A review. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1997; 9: 933 â 941.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBelser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implantâ supported restorations in the anterior region: Prosthetic considerations. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1996; 8: 875 â 883.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSpray JR, Black CG, Morris HF, Ochi S. Influence of bone thickness on facial marginal bone response: Stage 1 placement through stage 2 uncovering. Ann Periodontol 2000; 5: 119 â 128.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKazor CE, Alâ Shammari K, Sarment DP, Misch CE, Wang Hâ L. Implant plastic surgery: A review and rationale. J Oral Implantol 2004; 30: 240 â 254.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRosenquist B, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: Implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11: 205 â 209.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrunder U, Polizzi G, Goene R, et al. A 3â year prospective multicenter followâ up report on the immediate and delayedâ immediate placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14: 210 â 216.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O, Gelernter I. Healing of marginal defects at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets or after 4â 6 weeks of healing. A comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 410 â 419.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989; 9(5): 332 â 343.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBlock MS, Kent JN. Factors associated with softâ and hardâ tissue compromise of endosseous implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48: 1153 â 1160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker W, Becker BB. Promotion around eâ PTFE â Augmented implants placed in immediate extraction sockets. In: Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK, eds. Guided Bone Regeneration in Implant Dentistry, 1st ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 1994: 137 â 155.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Steenberghe D, Callens A, Geers L, Jacobs R. The clinical use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on bone regeneration in conjunction with immediate implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; 11: 210 â 216.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCaplanis N, Lozada JL, Kan JY. Extraction defect assessment, classification, and management. J Calif Dent Assoc 2005; 33: 853 â 863.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHeld SA, Kao YH, Wells DW. Endoscope â An endodontic application. J Endod 1996; 22: 327 â 329.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiltfang J, Merten HA, Ludwig A, Engelke W, Artz T. Roentgenologic, endoscopic and ultrasound evaluation of the maxillary sinus after sinus lift with simultaneous endosseous implantation (in German). Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 1999; 3 ( Suppl. 1 ): 61 â 64.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngelke W, Schwarzwäller W, Behnsen A, Jacobs HG. Subantroscopic laterobasal sinus floor augmentation (SALSA): An upâ toâ 5â year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 135 â 143.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngelke W. In situ examination of implant sites with support immersion endoscopy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 703 â 706.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEngelke W, Decco OA, Rau MJ, Massoni MC, Schwarzwaller W. In vitro evaluation of horizontal implant micromovement in bone specimen with contact endoscopy. Implant Dent 2004; 13: 88 â 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePolson AM. The research team, calibration, and quality assurance in clinical trials in periodontics. Ann Periodontol 1997; 2: 75 â 82.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceClaffey N, Shanley D. Relationship of gingival thickness and bleeding to loss of probing attachment in shallow sites following nonsurgical periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol 1986; 13: 654 â 657.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker W. Immediate implant placement: Diagnosis, treatment planning and treatment steps/or successful outcomes. J Calif Dent Assoc 2005; 33: 303 â 310.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCardaropoli G, Lekholm U, Wennstrom JL. Tissue alterations at implantâ supported singleâ tooth replacements: A 1â year prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 165 â 171.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDenissen HW, Kalk W. Preventive implantations. Int Dent J 1991; 41: 17 â 24.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWerbitt MJ, Goldberg PV. The immediate implant: Bone preservation and bone regeneration. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992; 12: 206 â 217.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWheeler SL, Vogel RE, Casellini R. Tissue preservation and maintenance of optimum esthetics: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 265 â 271.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker W, Hujoel P, Becker BE. Effect of barrier membranes and autologous bone grafts on ridge width preservation around implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002; 4: 143 â 149.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following singleâ tooth extraction: A clinical and radiographic 12â month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003; 23: 313 â 323.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBotticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hardâ tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004; 31: 820 â 828.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 645 â 652.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005; 32: 212 â 218.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Modeling of the buccal and lingual bone walls of fresh extraction sites following implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 606 â 614.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom JL, Lindhe J. Tissue modeling following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006; 17: 615 â 624.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovani U, Cornelini R, Barone A. Buccoâ lingual bone remodeling around implants placed into immediate extraction sockets: A case series. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 268 â 273.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper0064.pdf
Size:
15.82MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.