View Item 

Show simple item record

The Effect of Flapless Surgery on Implant Survival and Marginal Bone Level: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis
dc.contributor.authorLin, Guo‐hao
dc.contributor.authorChan, Hsun‐liang
dc.contributor.authorBashutski, Jill D.
dc.contributor.authorOh, Tae‐ju
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:46:11Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:46:11Z
dc.date.issued2014-05
dc.identifier.citationLin, Guo‐hao ; Chan, Hsun‐liang ; Bashutski, Jill D.; Oh, Tae‐ju ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2014). "The Effect of Flapless Surgery on Implant Survival and Marginal Bone Level: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis." Journal of Periodontology 85(5): e91-e103.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142097
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.subject.othersurgical flaps
dc.subject.otherDental implants
dc.subject.othergingiva
dc.subject.othergingival recession
dc.subject.othermetaâ analysis
dc.subject.otherreview
dc.titleThe Effect of Flapless Surgery on Implant Survival and Marginal Bone Level: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumGraduate Periodontics, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142097/1/jpere91.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2013.130481
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMaló P, Nobre Md. Flap vs. flapless surgical techniques at immediate implant function in predominantly soft bone for rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective cohort study with followâ up of 1 year. Eur J Oral Implantology 2008; 1: 293 â 304.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTee YL. Minimally invasive surgical placements of nonsubmerged dental implants: A case series report, evaluation of the surgical technique and complications. J Oral Implantol 2011; 37: 579 â 587.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlâ Juboori MJ, Bin Abdulrahaman S, Jassan A. Comparison of flapless and conventional flap and the effect on crestal bone resorption during a 12â week healing period. Dent Implantol Update 2012; 23: 9 â 16.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePozzi A, Sannino G, Barlattani A. Minimally invasive treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla: A proofâ ofâ concept prospective study with a followâ up of between 36 and 54 months. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 108: 286 â 297.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTsoukaki M, Kalpidis CD, Sakellari D, Tsalikis L, Mikrogiorgis G, Konstantinidis A. Clinical, radiographic, microbiological, and immunological outcomes of flapped vs. flapless dental implants: A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 969 â 976
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOzan O, Turkyilmaz I, Yilmaz B. A preliminary report of patients treated with early loaded implants using computerized tomographyâ guided surgical stents: Flapless versus conventional flapped surgery. J Oral Rehabil 2007; 34: 835 â 840.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVilla R, Rangert B. Immediate and early function of implants placed in extraction sockets of maxillary infected teeth: A pilot study. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97 (Suppl. 6): S96 â S108.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovani U, Cornelini R, Barone A. Buccal bone augmentation around immediate implants with and without flap elevation: A modified approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 841 â 846.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSennerby L, Rocci A, Becker W, Jonsson L, Johansson LA, Albrektsson T. Shortâ term clinical results of Nobel Direct implants: A retrospective multicentre analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 219 â 226.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRousseau P. Flapless and traditional dental implant surgery: An open, retrospective comparative study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 2299 â 2306.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVan de Velde T, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. The clinical and radiographic outcome of implants placed in the posterior maxilla with a guided flapless approach and immediately restored with a provisional rehabilitation: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 1223 â 1233.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCannizzaro G, Felice P, Leone M, Checchi V, Esposito M. Flapless versus open flap implant surgery in partially edentulous patients subjected to immediate loading: 1â year results from a splitâ mouth randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2011; 4: 177 â 188.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDe Bruyn H, Atashkadeh M, Cosyn J, van de Velde T. Clinical outcome and bone preservation of single TiUniteâ ¢ implants installed with flapless or flap surgery. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13: 175 â 183.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFroum SJ, Cho SC, Elian N, et al. Survival rate of oneâ piece dental implants placed with a flapless or flap protocol â A randomized, controlled study: 12â month results. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2011; 31: 591 â 601.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSunitha RV, Sapthagiri E. Flapless implant surgery: A 2â year followâ up study of 40 implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013; 116: e237 â e243.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBashutski JD, Wang HL, Rudek I, Moreno I, Koticha T, Oh TJ. Effect of flapless surgery on singleâ tooth implants in the esthetic zone: A randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2013; 84: 1747 â 1754.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLandis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159 â 174.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran DL, Morton D, Weber HP. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19 (Suppl): 109 â 113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. The significance of keratinized mucosa on implant health: A systematic review. J Periodontol 2013; 84: 1755 â 1767.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGreenstein G, Cavallaro J. The clinical significance of keratinized gingiva around dental implants. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011;32:24â 31; quiz 32, 34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceKan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Sclar A, Lozada JL. Effects of the facial osseous defect morphology on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration: 1â year results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 ( 7 Suppl 1.): 13 â 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRaes F, Cosyn J, Crommelinck E, Coessens P, De Bruyn H. Immediate and conventional single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: 1â year results of a case series on hard and soft tissue response and aesthetics. J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38: 385 â 394.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLin GH, Chan HL, Wang HL. Effects of currently available surgical and restorative interventions on reducing midfacial mucosal recession of immediately placed singleâ tooth implants: A systematic review. J Periodontol 2013; 85: 92 â 102.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCochran DL, Schou S, Heitzâ Mayfield LJ, Bornstein MM, Salvi GE, Martin WC. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding risk factors in implant therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 (Suppl.): 86 â 89.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMoy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failure rates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 569 â 577.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWallace RH. The relationship between cigarette smoking and dental implant failure. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2000; 8: 103 â 106.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSclar AG. Guidelines for flapless surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007; 65 ( 7 Suppl. 1): 20 â 32.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArisan V, Karabuda CZ, Ozdemir T. Implant surgery using boneâ and mucosaâ supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: Surgical and postâ operative outcomes of computerâ aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 980 â 988.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCampelo LD, Camara JR. Flapless implant surgery: A 10â year clinical retrospective analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 271 â 276.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDoan N, Du Z, Crawford R, Reher P, Xiao Y. Is flapless implant surgery a viable option in posterior maxilla? A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012; 41: 1064 â 1071.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOh TJ, Shotwell JL, Billy EJ, Wang HL. Effect of flapless implant surgery on soft tissue profile: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 874 â 882.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCostich ER, Ramfjord SP. Healing after partial denudation of the alveolar process. J Periodontol 1968; 39: 127 â 134.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStaffileno H. Significant differences and advantages between the full thickness and split thickness flaps. J Periodontol 1974; 45: 421 â 425.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading in the maxilla using flapless surgery, implants placed in predetermined positions, and prefabricated provisional restorations: A retrospective 3â year clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003; 5 (Suppl. 1): 29 â 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L. Minimally invasive flapless implant surgery: A prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7 (Suppl. 1): S21 â S27.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRao W, Benzi R. Single mandibular first molar implants with flapless guided surgery and immediate function: Preliminary clinical and radiographic results of a prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97 (Suppl. 6): S3 â S14.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBecker W, Goldstein M, Becker BE, Sennerby L, Kois D, Hujoel P. Minimally invasive flapless implant placement: Followâ up results from a multicenter study. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 347 â 352.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCosyn J, Sabzevar MM, De Bruyn H. Predictors of interâ proximal and midfacial recession following single implant treatment in the anterior maxilla: A multivariate analysis. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 895 â 903.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBrodala N. Flapless surgery and its effect on dental implant outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24 (Suppl.): 118 â 125.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available at: http://www.cochraneâ handbook.org. Accessed April 13, 2013.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSchulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 726 â 732.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJemt T. Regeneration of gingival papillae after singleâ implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17: 326 â 333.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSilness J, Löe H. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condtion. Acta Odontol Scand 1964; 22: 121 â 135.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr., Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987; 2: 145 â 151.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLöe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand 1963; 21: 533 â 551.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaâ analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: W65â 94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGomezâ Roman G. Influence of flap design on periâ implant interproximal crestal bone loss around singleâ tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16: 61 â 67.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCovani U, Barone A, Cornelini R, Crespi R. Soft tissue healing around implants placed immediately after tooth extraction without incision: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 549 â 553.
dc.identifier.citedreferencevan Steenberghe D, Glauser R, Blombäck U, et al. A computed tomographic scanâ derived customized surgical template and fixed prosthesis for flapless surgery and immediate loading of implants in fully edentulous maxillae: A prospective multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005; 7 (Suppl. 1): S111 â S120.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFortin T, Bosson JL, Isidori M, Blanchet E. Effect of flapless surgery on pain experienced in implant placement using an imageâ guided system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 298 â 304.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCannizzaro G, Leone M, Esposito M. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery in the edentulous maxilla: 1â year followâ up of a single cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 87 â 95.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMalo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Lopes A. The use of computerâ guided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: Preliminary results after a mean followâ up period of thirteen months. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97 (Suppl. 6): S26 â S34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNickenig HJ, Eitner S. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2007; 35: 207 â 211.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceOh TJ, Shotwell J, Billy E, Byun HY, Wang HL. Flapless implant surgery in the esthetic region: Advantages and precautions. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2007; 27: 27 â 33.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSanna AM, Molly L, van Steenberghe D. Immediately loaded CADâ CAM manufactured fixed complete dentures using flapless implant placement procedures: A cohort study of consecutive patients. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97: 331 â 339.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCannizzaro G, Leone M, Consolo U, Ferri V, Esposito M. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery versus conventional implants in partially edentulous patients: A 3â year randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 867 â 875.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGabriÄ PanduriÄ D, Katanec D, GraniÄ M, KomljenoviÄ â Blitva D, Basha M, SusiÄ M. Densitometric analysis of dental implant placement between flapless technique and the twoâ stage technique â A pilot study. Coll Antropol 2008; 32: 529 â 533.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeong SM, Choi BH, Li J, Ahn KM, Lee SH, Xuan F. Bone healing around implants following flap and miniâ flap surgeries: A radiographic evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 105: 293 â 296.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJob S, Bhat V, Naidu EM. In vivo evaluation of crestal bone heights following implant placement with â flaplessâ and â withâ flapâ techniques in sites of immediately loaded implants. Indian J Dent Res 2008; 19: 320 â 325.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerdougo M, Fortin T, Blanchet E, Isidori M, Bosson JL. Flapless implant surgery using an imageâ guided system. A 1â to 4â year retrospective multicenter comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010; 12: 142 â 152.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLindeboom JA, van Wijk AJ. A comparison of two implant techniques on patientâ based outcome measures: A report of flapless vs. conventional flapped implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 366 â 370.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeong SM, Choi BH, Kim J, et al. A 1â year prospective clinical study of soft tissue conditions and marginal bone changes around dental implants after flapless implant surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: 41 â 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee DH, Choi BH, Jeong SM, Xuan F, Kim HR. Effects of flapless implant surgery on soft tissue profiles: A prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011; 13: 324 â 329.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jpere91.pdf
Size:
1.019MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.