View Item 

Show simple item record

Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Periodontal Defect Measurements
dc.contributor.authorMisch, Kelly A.
dc.contributor.authorYi, Erica S.
dc.contributor.authorSarment, David P.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:46:15Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:46:15Z
dc.date.issued2006-07
dc.identifier.citationMisch, Kelly A.; Yi, Erica S.; Sarment, David P. (2006). "Accuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Periodontal Defect Measurements." Journal of Periodontology 77(7): 1261-1266.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142101
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.subject.otherperiodontal disease
dc.subject.otherradiographic image enhancement
dc.subject.otherthree‐dimensional imaging
dc.subject.otherx‐ray computed tomography
dc.subject.otherAlveolar bone loss
dc.subject.otherdiagnosis
dc.titleAccuracy of Cone Beam Computed Tomography for Periodontal Defect Measurements
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142101/1/jper1261.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2006.050367
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988: 8 – 41.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuhrmann RA, Bucker A, Diedrich PR. Assessment of alveolar bone loss with high resolution computed tomography. J Periodontal Res 1995; 30: 258 – 263.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceIda M, Watanabe H, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T. CT findings as a significant predictive factor for the curability of mandibular osteomyelitis: Multivariate analysis. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 86 – 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHamada Y, Kondoh T, Noguchi K, et al. Application of limited cone beam computed tomography to clinical assessment of alveolar bone grafting: A preliminary report. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42: 128 – 137.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCasap N, Tarazi E, Wexler A, Sonnenfeld U, Lustmann J. Intraoperative computerized navigation for flapless implant surgery and immediate loading in the edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 92 – 98.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceParel SM, Triplett RG. Interactive imaging for implant planning, placement, and prosthesis construction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 62 ( Suppl. 2 ) 41 – 47.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceArai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 245 – 248.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone‐beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558 – 1564.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAraki K, Maki K, Seki K, et al. Characteristics of a newly developed dentomaxillofacial x‐ray cone beam CT scanner (CB MercuRay): System configuration and physical properties. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 51 – 59.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHashimoto K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Araki M, Kawashima S, Terakado M. A comparison of a new limited cone beam computed tomography machine for dental use with a multidetector row helical CT machine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95: 371 – 377.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDanforth RA. Cone beam volume tomography: A new digital imaging option for dentistry. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003; 31: 814 – 815.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceSukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003; 6 ( Suppl. 1 ) 31 – 36.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLudlow JB, Davies‐Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 229 – 234.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLascala CA, Panella J, Marques MM. Analysis of the accuracy of linear measurements obtained by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT‐NewTom). Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 291 – 294.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMengel R, Candir M, Shiratori K, Flores‐de‐Jacoby L. Digital volume tomography in the diagnosis of periodontal defects: An in vitro study on native pig and human mandibles. J Periodontol 2005; 76: 665 – 673.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuhrmann R. Three‐dimensional interpretation of alveolar bone dehiscences: An anatomical‐radiological study – Part I. J Orofac Orthop 1996; 57: 62 – 74.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceFuhrmann R. Three‐dimensional interpretation of labiolingual bone width of the lower incisors. Part II. J Orofac Orthop 1996; 57: 168 – 185.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observations of experimental lesions in bone. J Am Dent Assoc 1961; 62: 152 – 160.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLee SJ, Messer H. Radiographic appearance of artificially prepared periapical lesions confined to cancellous bone. Int Endod J 1986; 19: 64 – 72.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMarmulla R, Wortche R, Muhling J, Hassfeld S. Geometric accuracy of the NewTom 9000 cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 28 – 31.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTyndall AA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: A position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 630 – 637.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHonda K, Arai Y, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Saitou T, Shinoda K. Fundamental efficiency of new‐style limited cone‐beam CT (3DX): Comparison with helical‐CT. Jpn J Tomogr 2001; 27: 193 – 198.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceScaf G, Lurie AG, Mosier KM, Kantor ML, Ramsby GR, Freedman ML. Dosimetry and cost of imaging osseointegrated implants with film‐based and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1997; 83: 41 – 48.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAvendanio B, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Effective dose and risk assessment from detailed narrow beam radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 713 – 719.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeffcoat MK. Current concepts in periodontal disease testing. J Am Dent Assoc 1994; 125: 1071 – 1078.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMolander B. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics. Swed Dent J Suppl 1996; 119: 1 – 26.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeffcoat MK. Radiographic methods for the detection of progressive alveolar bone loss. J Periodontol 1992; 63 ( Suppl. ) 367 – 372.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceReddy MS. Radiographic methods in the evaluation of periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1992; 63 ( Suppl. ) 1078 – 1084.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRamadan AB, Mitchell DF. A roentgenographic study of experimental bone destruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1962; 15: 934 – 943.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRees T, Biggs NL, Collins CK. Radiographic interpretation of periodontal osseous defects. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1971; 2: 141 – 153.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEickholz P, Hausmann E. Accuracy of radiographic assessment of interproximal bone loss in intrabony defects using linear measurements. Eur J Oral Sci 2000; 108: 70 – 73.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHirschmann PN. Radiographic interpretation of chronic periodontitis. Int Dent J 1987; 37: 3 – 9.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHonda K, Arai Y, Kashima M, et al. Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone‐beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 391 – 395.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper1261.pdf
Size:
4.687MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.