View Item 

Show simple item record

Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on Periâ Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis
dc.contributor.authorSuárez‐lópez Del Amo, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorLin, Guo‐hao
dc.contributor.authorMonje, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorGalindo‐moreno, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom‐lay
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:48:46Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:48:46Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.citationSuárez‐lópez Del Amo, Fernando ; Lin, Guo‐hao ; Monje, Alberto; Galindo‐moreno, Pablo ; Wang, Hom‐lay (2016). "Influence of Soft Tissue Thickness on Periâ Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis." Journal of Periodontology 87(6): 690-699.
dc.identifier.issn0022-3492
dc.identifier.issn1943-3670
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142241
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Periodontology
dc.subject.otherAlveolar bone loss
dc.subject.otherdental implantâ abutment design
dc.subject.otherdental implants
dc.subject.otherendosseous dental implantation
dc.subject.otherevidenceâ based dentistry
dc.subject.otherreview, systematic
dc.titleInfluence of Soft Tissue Thickness on Periâ Implant Marginal Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Metaâ Analysis
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelDentistry
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelHealth Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumDepartment of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.
dc.contributor.affiliationotherDepartment of Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142241/1/jper0690.pdf
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142241/2/jper0690-sup-0001.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1902/jop.2016.150571
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Periodontology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Puisys A, Linkeviciene L, Peciuliene V, Schlee M. Crestal bone stability around implants with horizontally matching connection after soft tissue thickening: A prospective clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17: 497 â 508.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAtieh MA, Ibrahim HM, Atieh AH. Platform switching for marginal bone preservation around dental implants: A systematic review and metaâ analysis. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 1350 â 1366.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Puisys A, Svediene O, Linkevicius R, Linkeviciene L. Radiological comparison of laserâ microtextured and platformâ switched implants in thin mucosal biotype. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 599 â 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceShea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, et al. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2009; 62: 1013 â 1020.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLiberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metaâ analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med 2009; 151: W65â W94.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHiggins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration 2011. Available at: http:/www.cochranehandbook.org. Accessed November 19, 2015.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastleâ Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaâ analyses. Eur J Epidemiol 2010; 25: 603 â 605.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. The influence of soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants: A 1â year prospective controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 712 â 719.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. Reaction of crestal bone around implants depending on mucosal tissue thickness. A 1â year prospective clinical study. Stomatologija 2009; 11: 83 â 91.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePuisys A, Linkevicius T. The influence of mucosal tissue thickening on crestal bone stability around boneâ level implants. A prospective controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 123 â 129.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceTan WC, Lang NP, Schmidlin K, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. The effect of different implant neck configurations on soft and hard tissue healing: A randomizedâ controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 14 â 19.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Puisys A, Steigmann M, Vindasiute E, Linkeviciene L. Influence of vertical soft tissue thickness on crestal bone changes around implants with platform switching: A comparative clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2015; 17: 1228 â 1236.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJeong SM, Choi BH, Kim J, et al. A 1â year prospective clinical study of soft tissue conditions and marginal bone changes around dental implants after flapless implant surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011; 111: 41 â 46.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennström J, Lindhe J. The periâ implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 212 â 219.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAbrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Moon IS, Lindhe J. Periâ implant tissues at submerged and nonâ submerged titanium implants. J Clin Periodontol 1999; 26: 600 â 607.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Lindhe J, Ericsson I, Marinello CP, Liljenberg B, Thomsen P. The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991; 2: 81 â 90.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindoâ Moreno P, Leónâ Cano A, Ortegaâ Oller I, et al. Prosthetic abutment height is a key factor in periâ implant marginal bone loss. J Dent Res 2014; 93 ( Suppl. 7 ): 80S â 85S.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVervaeke S, Dierens M, Besseler J, De Bruyn H. The influence of initial soft tissue thickness on periâ implant bone remodeling. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 16: 238 â 247.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAnnibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, Graziani F, La Monaca G, Polimeni A. Periâ implant marginal bone level: A systematic review and metaâ analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol 2012; 39: 1097 â 1113.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceRomanos GE, Javed F. Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: Truth or myth? J Oral Rehabil 2014; 41: 700 â 708.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLinkevicius T, Apse P, Grybauskas S, Puisys A. Influence of thin mucosal tissues on crestal bone stability around implants with platform switching: A 1â year pilot study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 68: 2272 â 2277.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceVandeweghe S, De Bruyn H. A withinâ implant comparison to evaluate the concept of platform switching: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2012; 5: 253 â 262.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindoâ Moreno P, Leonâ Cano A, Monje A, Ortegaâ Oller I, O Valle F, Catena A. Abutment height influences the effect of platform switching on periâ implant marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016; 27: 167 â 173.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiesner G, Esposito M, Worthington H, Schlee M. Connective tissue grafts for thickening periâ implant tissues at implant placement. Oneâ year results from an explanatory splitâ mouth randomised controlled clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantology 2010; 3: 27 â 35.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceDibart S, Warbington M, Su MF, Skobe Z. In vitro evaluation of the implantâ abutment bacterial seal: The locking taper system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 732 â 737.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGrunder U, Gracis S, Capelli M. Influence of the 3â D boneâ toâ implant relationship on esthetics. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2005; 25: 113 â 119.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson T, Buser D, Sennerby L. Crestal bone loss and oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012; 14: 783 â 791.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The longâ term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11 â 25.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceAlbrektsson T, Dahlin C, Jemt T, Sennerby L, Turri A, Wennerberg A. Is marginal bone loss around oral implants the result of a provoked foreign body reaction? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2014; 16: 155 â 165.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceGalindoâ Moreno P, Leónâ Cano A, Ortegaâ Oller I, Monje A, Oâ Valle F, Catena A. Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry: Beyond 2 mm. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: e28 â e34.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceMisch CE, Dietshâ Misch F, Hoar J, Beck G, Hazen R, Misch CM. A bone qualityâ based implant system: First year of prosthetic loading. J Oral Implantol 1999; 25: 185 â 197.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHermann JS, Schoolfield JD, Schenk RK, Buser D, Cochran DL. Influence of the size of the microgap on crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded nonâ submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 1372 â 1383.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceWiskott HW, Belser UC. Lack of integration of smooth titanium surfaces: A working hypothesis based on strains generated in the surrounding bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 429 â 444.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBarboza EP, Caúla AL, Carvalho WR. Crestal bone loss around submerged and exposed unloaded dental implants: A radiographic and microbiological descriptive study. Implant Dent 2002; 11: 162 â 169.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBerglundh T, Lindhe J. Dimension of the periimplant mucosa. Biological width revisited. J Clin Periodontol 1996; 23: 971 â 973.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceLazzara RJ, Porter SS. Platform switching: A new concept in implant dentistry for controlling postrestorative crestal bone levels. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006; 26: 9 â 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferencePiattelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Iezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A. Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: A retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 346 â 352.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceNevins M, Nevins ML, Camelo M, Boyesen JL, Kim DM. Human histologic evidence of a connective tissue attachment to a dental implant. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008; 28: 111 â 121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHämmerle CH, Brägger U, Bürgin W, Lang NP. The effect of subcrestal placement of the polished surface of ITI implants on marginal soft and hard tissues. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996; 7: 111 â 119.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceEricsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Marinello CP, Lindhe J, Klinge B. Different types of inflammatory reactions in periâ implant soft tissues. J Clin Periodontol 1995; 22: 255 â 261.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceHermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Cochran DL. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded nonâ submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 2000; 71: 1412 â 1424.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceBroggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, et al. Periâ implant inflammation defined by the implantâ abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 473 â 478.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanullo L, Fedele GR, Iannello G, Jepsen S. Platform switching and marginal boneâ level alterations: The results of a randomizedâ controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 115 â 121.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanullo L, Iannello G, Peñarocha M, Garcia B. Impact of implant diameter on bone level changes around platform switched implants: Preliminary results of 18 months followâ up a prospective randomized matchâ paired controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23: 1142 â 1146.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceCanullo L, Iannello G, Götz W. The influence of individual bone patterns on periâ implant bone loss: Preliminary report from a 3â year randomized clinical and histologic trial in patients treated with implants restored with matchingâ diameter abutments or the platformâ switching concept. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 618 â 630.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceStrietzel FP, Neumann K, Hertel M. Impact of platform switching on marginal periâ implant boneâ level changes. A systematic review and metaâ analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 342 â 358.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jper0690.pdf
Size:
868.4KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open
Name:
jper0690-sup-0001.pdf
Size:
32.53KB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.