Emotion Appraisal Tendencies and Carryover: How, Why, and … Therefore?
dc.contributor.author | Yates, Frank J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-05T16:49:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-05T16:49:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007-07 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Yates, Frank J. (2007). "Emotion Appraisal Tendencies and Carryover: How, Why, and … Therefore?." Journal of Consumer Psychology 17(3): 179-183. | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1057-7408 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1532-7663 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142287 | |
dc.publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. | |
dc.publisher | Stanford University Press | |
dc.title | Emotion Appraisal Tendencies and Carryover: How, Why, and … Therefore? | |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.rights.robots | IndexNoFollow | |
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevel | Psychology | |
dc.subject.hlbtoplevel | Social Sciences | |
dc.description.peerreviewed | Peer Reviewed | |
dc.contributor.affiliationum | The University of Michigan | |
dc.description.bitstreamurl | https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142287/1/jcpy179.pdf | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70026-8 | |
dc.identifier.source | Journal of Consumer Psychology | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, A.R. Damasio. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science. 1997; 275: 1293 – 1295. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | H.F. Chua, J.F. Yates, P. Shah. Risk avoidance: Graphs vs. numbers. Memory & Cognition. 2006; 34: 399 – 410. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. Epstein. Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist. 1994; 49: 709 – 724. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | L. Festinger. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1962. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | M.L. Finucane, A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, S.M. Johnson. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2000; 13: 1 – 17. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J.P. Forgas. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin. 1995; 117: 39 – 66. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | S. Han, J.S. Lerner, D. Keltner. Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal‐tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2007; 17: 158 – 168. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | A.M. Isen, N. Geva. The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1987; 39: 145 – 154. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J.S. Lerner, D. Keltner. Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001; 81: 146 – 159. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | G.F. Loewenstein, E.U. Weber, C.K. Hsee, N. Welch. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin. 2001; 127: 267 – 286. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | B.A. Mellers, A. Schwartz, K. Ho, I. Ritov. Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science. 1997; 8: 423 – 429. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | D. Simon, D.C. Krawczyk, K.J. Holyoak. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science. 2004; 15: 331 – 336. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | P. Slovic. Cue consistency and cue utilization in judgment. American Journal of Psychology. 1966; 79: 421 – 430. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | C.A. Smith, P.C. Ellsworth. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985; 48: 813 – 838. | |
dc.identifier.citedreference | J.F. Yates. Decision management. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass. 2003. | |
dc.owningcollname | Interdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed |
Files in this item
Remediation of Harmful Language
The University of Michigan Library aims to describe its collections in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in them. We encourage you to Contact Us anonymously if you encounter harmful or problematic language in catalog records or finding aids. More information about our policies and practices is available at Remediation of Harmful Language.
Accessibility
If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.