View Item 

Show simple item record

Emotion Appraisal Tendencies and Carryover: How, Why, and … Therefore?
dc.contributor.authorYates, Frank J.
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-05T16:49:30Z
dc.date.available2018-02-05T16:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2007-07
dc.identifier.citationYates, Frank J. (2007). "Emotion Appraisal Tendencies and Carryover: How, Why, and … Therefore?." Journal of Consumer Psychology 17(3): 179-183.
dc.identifier.issn1057-7408
dc.identifier.issn1532-7663
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/2027.42/142287
dc.publisherWiley Periodicals, Inc.
dc.publisherStanford University Press
dc.titleEmotion Appraisal Tendencies and Carryover: How, Why, and … Therefore?
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.rights.robotsIndexNoFollow
dc.subject.hlbsecondlevelPsychology
dc.subject.hlbtoplevelSocial Sciences
dc.description.peerreviewedPeer Reviewed
dc.contributor.affiliationumThe University of Michigan
dc.description.bitstreamurlhttps://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/142287/1/jcpy179.pdf
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70026-8
dc.identifier.sourceJournal of Consumer Psychology
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA. Bechara, H. Damasio, D. Tranel, A.R. Damasio. Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science. 1997; 275: 1293 – 1295.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceH.F. Chua, J.F. Yates, P. Shah. Risk avoidance: Graphs vs. numbers. Memory & Cognition. 2006; 34: 399 – 410.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Epstein. Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist. 1994; 49: 709 – 724.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceL. Festinger. A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 1962.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceM.L. Finucane, A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, S.M. Johnson. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2000; 13: 1 – 17.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.P. Forgas. Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin. 1995; 117: 39 – 66.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceS. Han, J.S. Lerner, D. Keltner. Feelings and consumer decision making: The appraisal‐tendency framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology. 2007; 17: 158 – 168.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceA.M. Isen, N. Geva. The influence of positive affect on acceptable level of risk: The person with a large canoe has a large worry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1987; 39: 145 – 154.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.S. Lerner, D. Keltner. Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001; 81: 146 – 159.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceG.F. Loewenstein, E.U. Weber, C.K. Hsee, N. Welch. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin. 2001; 127: 267 – 286.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceB.A. Mellers, A. Schwartz, K. Ho, I. Ritov. Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science. 1997; 8: 423 – 429.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceD. Simon, D.C. Krawczyk, K.J. Holyoak. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychological Science. 2004; 15: 331 – 336.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceP. Slovic. Cue consistency and cue utilization in judgment. American Journal of Psychology. 1966; 79: 421 – 430.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceC.A. Smith, P.C. Ellsworth. Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1985; 48: 813 – 838.
dc.identifier.citedreferenceJ.F. Yates. Decision management. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass. 2003.
dc.owningcollnameInterdisciplinary and Peer-Reviewed


Files in this item

Name:
jcpy179.pdf
Size:
1.386MB
Format:
PDF
View/Open

Show simple item record

Remediation of Harmful Language

The University of Michigan Library aims to describe library materials in a way that respects the people and communities who create, use, and are represented in our collections. Report harmful or offensive language in catalog records, finding aids, or elsewhere in our collections anonymously through our metadata feedback form. More information at Remediation of Harmful Language.

Accessibility

If you are unable to use this file in its current format, please select the Contact Us link and we can modify it to make it more accessible to you.